occ common area should be mapped once and disable it for every
other chip.

Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.ibm.com>
---
 hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
index cb6d6bbcfc..f797a5ec7d 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
@@ -98,13 +98,22 @@ static uint64_t xscom_read_default(PnvChip *chip, uint32_t pcba)
         return HOMER_SIZE_MASK;
 
     case P9_PBA_BAR2: /* P9 occ common area */
-        return PNV9_OCC_COMMON_AREA(chip);
+        if (!PNV_CHIP_INDEX(chip)) {
+            return PNV9_OCC_COMMON_AREA(chip);
+        }
+        return 0;
     case P8_PBA_BAR3: /* P8 occ common area */
-        return PNV_OCC_COMMON_AREA(chip);
+        if (!PNV_CHIP_INDEX(chip)) {
+            return PNV_OCC_COMMON_AREA(chip);
+        }
+        return 0;
 
     case P9_PBA_BARMASK2: /* P9 occ common area size */
     case P8_PBA_BARMASK3: /* P8 occ common area size */
-        return OCC_SIZE_MASK;
+        if (!PNV_CHIP_INDEX(chip)) {
+            return OCC_SIZE_MASK;
+        }
+        return 0;
 
     case 0x1010c00:     /* PIBAM FIR */
     case 0x1010c03:     /* PIBAM FIR MASK */
-- 
2.14.5

On 19/11/2019 18:50, Balamuruhan S wrote:
> occ common area should be mapped once 

It's the same address on each chip. 

the question is how the HW knows from which chip the OCC access is 
being done ? How does it target the correct OCC if the address is 
the same ? 

> and disable it for every other chip.

On P8 OpenPOWER systems, the PBA3 registers are still set, not on
tuletas though (different hostboot I suppose). On OpenPOWER systems,
they are still set also.
 
> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>

nah. I didn't write any of this :) 

> Signed-off-by: Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
> index cb6d6bbcfc..f797a5ec7d 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
> @@ -98,13 +98,22 @@ static uint64_t xscom_read_default(PnvChip *chip, uint32_t pcba)
>          return HOMER_SIZE_MASK;
>  
>      case P9_PBA_BAR2: /* P9 occ common area */
> -        return PNV9_OCC_COMMON_AREA(chip);
> +        if (!PNV_CHIP_INDEX(chip)) {

Yes that it is the idea. XIVE uses directly 'chip->chip_id'. 


> +            return PNV9_OCC_COMMON_AREA(chip);
> +        }
> +        return 0;
>      case P8_PBA_BAR3: /* P8 occ common area */
> -        return PNV_OCC_COMMON_AREA(chip);
> +        if (!PNV_CHIP_INDEX(chip)) {
> +            return PNV_OCC_COMMON_AREA(chip);
> +        }
> +        return 0;
>  
>      case P9_PBA_BARMASK2: /* P9 occ common area size */
>      case P8_PBA_BARMASK3: /* P8 occ common area size */
> -        return OCC_SIZE_MASK;
> +        if (!PNV_CHIP_INDEX(chip)) {
> +            return OCC_SIZE_MASK;
> +        }
> +        return 0;
>  
>      case 0x1010c00:     /* PIBAM FIR */
>      case 0x1010c03:     /* PIBAM FIR MASK */
> 

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 08:30:03AM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 19/11/2019 18:50, Balamuruhan S wrote:
> > occ common area should be mapped once 
> 
> It's the same address on each chip. 
> 
> the question is how the HW knows from which chip the OCC access is 
> being done ? How does it target the correct OCC if the address is 
> the same ? 

I am not aware of it for now to answer/comment, will try to find
it.

> 
> > and disable it for every other chip.
> 
> On P8 OpenPOWER systems, the PBA3 registers are still set, not on
> tuletas though (different hostboot I suppose). On OpenPOWER systems,
> they are still set also.

Will have to do some study on skiboot.

>  
> > Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
> 
> nah. I didn't write any of this :) 
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
> > index cb6d6bbcfc..f797a5ec7d 100644
> > --- a/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
> > +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
> > @@ -98,13 +98,22 @@ static uint64_t xscom_read_default(PnvChip *chip, uint32_t pcba)
> >          return HOMER_SIZE_MASK;
> >  
> >      case P9_PBA_BAR2: /* P9 occ common area */
> > -        return PNV9_OCC_COMMON_AREA(chip);
> > +        if (!PNV_CHIP_INDEX(chip)) {
> 
> Yes that it is the idea. XIVE uses directly 'chip->chip_id'. 

:)

> 
> 
> > +            return PNV9_OCC_COMMON_AREA(chip);
> > +        }
> > +        return 0;
> >      case P8_PBA_BAR3: /* P8 occ common area */
> > -        return PNV_OCC_COMMON_AREA(chip);
> > +        if (!PNV_CHIP_INDEX(chip)) {
> > +            return PNV_OCC_COMMON_AREA(chip);
> > +        }
> > +        return 0;
> >  
> >      case P9_PBA_BARMASK2: /* P9 occ common area size */
> >      case P8_PBA_BARMASK3: /* P8 occ common area size */
> > -        return OCC_SIZE_MASK;
> > +        if (!PNV_CHIP_INDEX(chip)) {
> > +            return OCC_SIZE_MASK;
> > +        }
> > +        return 0;
> >  
> >      case 0x1010c00:     /* PIBAM FIR */
> >      case 0x1010c03:     /* PIBAM FIR MASK */
> > 
>