Update / add some libraries that we use in the Travis builds, and
enable compiling on the aarch64 host, too.

Thomas Huth (5):
  travis.yml: Add libvdeplug-dev to compile-test net/vde.c
  travis.yml: Use libsdl2 instead of libsdl1.2, and install
    libsdl2-image
  travis.yml: Use newer version of libgnutls and libpng
  travis.yml: Fix the ccache lines
  travis.yml: Compile on arm64, too

 .travis.yml | 21 +++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
2.18.1

Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:

> Update / add some libraries that we use in the Travis builds, and
> enable compiling on the aarch64 host, too.

Queued 1-3 to testing/next and I'll have a play with 4/5 but probably
won't include them in the final PR unless they seem solid.

>
> Thomas Huth (5):
>   travis.yml: Add libvdeplug-dev to compile-test net/vde.c
>   travis.yml: Use libsdl2 instead of libsdl1.2, and install
>     libsdl2-image
>   travis.yml: Use newer version of libgnutls and libpng
>   travis.yml: Fix the ccache lines
>   travis.yml: Compile on arm64, too
>
>  .travis.yml | 21 +++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)


--
Alex Bennée

On 16/10/2019 19.56, Alex Bennée wrote:
> 
> Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:
> 
>> Update / add some libraries that we use in the Travis builds, and
>> enable compiling on the aarch64 host, too.
> 
> Queued 1-3 to testing/next and I'll have a play with 4/5 but probably
> won't include them in the final PR unless they seem solid.

Thanks! I think you could also pick patch 4 since the current line with
"command -v ccache && ccache ..." is definitely nonsense (it currently
just works since we always compile with ccache). We should either apply
my patch 4, or if we say that we can not run without ccache, we should
remove the "command -v ccache &&" part instead.

 Thomas

On 10/21/19 3:53 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 16/10/2019 19.56, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>> Update / add some libraries that we use in the Travis builds, and
>>> enable compiling on the aarch64 host, too.
>>
>> Queued 1-3 to testing/next and I'll have a play with 4/5 but probably
>> won't include them in the final PR unless they seem solid.
> 
> Thanks! I think you could also pick patch 4 since the current line with
> "command -v ccache && ccache ..." is definitely nonsense (it currently
> just works since we always compile with ccache). We should either apply
> my patch 4, or if we say that we can not run without ccache, we should
> remove the "command -v ccache &&" part instead.

Yes, pick also #4 please :)