This does not really change anything, but it makes the code a bit easier
to follow once we use @socket as the opaque pointer for
aio_set_fd_handler().
(Also, this change stops us from creating new CURLSocket objects when
the cURL library just wants to stop listening on an existing socket that
we do not recognize. With a well-behaving cURL, that should never
happen anyway.)
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
---
block/curl.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/curl.c b/block/curl.c
index 92dc2f630e..8a45b371cc 100644
--- a/block/curl.c
+++ b/block/curl.c
@@ -174,18 +174,16 @@ static int curl_sock_cb(CURL *curl, curl_socket_t fd, int action,
if (socket->fd == fd) {
if (action == CURL_POLL_REMOVE) {
QLIST_REMOVE(socket, next);
- g_free(socket);
}
break;
}
}
- if (!socket) {
+ if (action != CURL_POLL_REMOVE && !socket) {
socket = g_new0(CURLSocket, 1);
socket->fd = fd;
socket->state = state;
QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&state->sockets, socket, next);
}
- socket = NULL;
trace_curl_sock_cb(action, (int)fd);
switch (action) {
@@ -207,6 +205,9 @@ static int curl_sock_cb(CURL *curl, curl_socket_t fd, int action,
break;
}
+ if (action == CURL_POLL_REMOVE) {
+ g_free(socket);
+ }
return 0;
}
--
2.21.0
On 8/27/19 12:34 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
> This does not really change anything, but it makes the code a bit easier
> to follow once we use @socket as the opaque pointer for
> aio_set_fd_handler().
>
> (Also, this change stops us from creating new CURLSocket objects when
> the cURL library just wants to stop listening on an existing socket that
> we do not recognize. With a well-behaving cURL, that should never
> happen anyway.)
>
> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/curl.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/curl.c b/block/curl.c
> index 92dc2f630e..8a45b371cc 100644
> --- a/block/curl.c
> +++ b/block/curl.c
> @@ -174,18 +174,16 @@ static int curl_sock_cb(CURL *curl, curl_socket_t fd, int action,
> if (socket->fd == fd) {
> if (action == CURL_POLL_REMOVE) {
> QLIST_REMOVE(socket, next);
> - g_free(socket);
> }
> break;
> }
> }
> - if (!socket) {
> + if (action != CURL_POLL_REMOVE && !socket) {
> socket = g_new0(CURLSocket, 1);
> socket->fd = fd;
> socket->state = state;
> QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&state->sockets, socket, next);
> }
> - socket = NULL;
>
> trace_curl_sock_cb(action, (int)fd);
> switch (action) {
> @@ -207,6 +205,9 @@ static int curl_sock_cb(CURL *curl, curl_socket_t fd, int action,
> break;
> }
>
> + if (action == CURL_POLL_REMOVE) {
> + g_free(socket);
> + }
> return 0;
> }
>
>
Very naive question: why is CURL_POLL_REMOVE handled so early in the
function? Why not handle both QLIST_REMOVE and g_free under the
switch(action) construct entirely?
On 09.09.19 22:09, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 8/27/19 12:34 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> This does not really change anything, but it makes the code a bit easier
>> to follow once we use @socket as the opaque pointer for
>> aio_set_fd_handler().
>>
>> (Also, this change stops us from creating new CURLSocket objects when
>> the cURL library just wants to stop listening on an existing socket that
>> we do not recognize. With a well-behaving cURL, that should never
>> happen anyway.)
>>
>> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
>> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> block/curl.c | 7 ++++---
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/curl.c b/block/curl.c
>> index 92dc2f630e..8a45b371cc 100644
>> --- a/block/curl.c
>> +++ b/block/curl.c
>> @@ -174,18 +174,16 @@ static int curl_sock_cb(CURL *curl, curl_socket_t fd, int action,
>> if (socket->fd == fd) {
>> if (action == CURL_POLL_REMOVE) {
>> QLIST_REMOVE(socket, next);
>> - g_free(socket);
>> }
>> break;
>> }
>> }
>
>> - if (!socket) {
>> + if (action != CURL_POLL_REMOVE && !socket) {
>> socket = g_new0(CURLSocket, 1);
>> socket->fd = fd;
>> socket->state = state;
>> QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&state->sockets, socket, next);
>> }
>> - socket = NULL;
>>
>> trace_curl_sock_cb(action, (int)fd);
>> switch (action) {
>> @@ -207,6 +205,9 @@ static int curl_sock_cb(CURL *curl, curl_socket_t fd, int action,
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> + if (action == CURL_POLL_REMOVE) {
>> + g_free(socket);
>> + }
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>>
>
> Very naive question: why is CURL_POLL_REMOVE handled so early in the
> function? Why not handle both QLIST_REMOVE and g_free under the
> switch(action) construct entirely?
I don’t know how that’s a naive question, it’s just a different way to
approach this problem. Sure, we can do that. It is probably more
intuitive to everyone who hasn’t seen the state before this series.
Max
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.