Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
---
crypto/block-luks.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/crypto/block-luks.c b/crypto/block-luks.c
index 6bb369f3b4..e1a4df94b7 100644
--- a/crypto/block-luks.c
+++ b/crypto/block-luks.c
@@ -417,6 +417,33 @@ static int masterkeylen(QCryptoBlockLUKS *luks)
}
+/*
+ * Returns number of sectors needed to store the key material
+ * given number of anti forensic stripes
+ */
+static int splitkeylen_sectors(QCryptoBlockLUKS *luks, int stripes)
+
+{
+ /*
+ * This calculation doesn't match that shown in the spec,
+ * but instead follows the cryptsetup implementation.
+ */
+
+ size_t header_sectors = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_OFFSET /
+ QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE;
+
+ size_t splitkeylen = masterkeylen(luks) * stripes;
+
+ /* First align the key material size to block size*/
+ size_t splitkeylen_sectors =
+ DIV_ROUND_UP(splitkeylen, QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE);
+
+ /* Then also align the key material size to the size of the header */
+ return ROUND_UP(splitkeylen_sectors, header_sectors);
+}
+
+
+
/*
* Stores the main LUKS header, taking care of endianess
*/
@@ -1169,7 +1196,7 @@ qcrypto_block_luks_create(QCryptoBlock *block,
QCryptoBlockCreateOptionsLUKS luks_opts;
Error *local_err = NULL;
uint8_t *masterkey = NULL;
- size_t splitkeylen = 0;
+ size_t next_sector;
size_t i;
char *password;
const char *cipher_alg;
@@ -1388,23 +1415,16 @@ qcrypto_block_luks_create(QCryptoBlock *block,
goto error;
}
+ /* start with the sector that follows the header*/
+ next_sector = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_OFFSET /
+ QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE;
- /* Although LUKS has multiple key slots, we're just going
- * to use the first key slot */
- splitkeylen = luks->header.key_bytes * QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_STRIPES;
for (i = 0; i < QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_NUM_KEY_SLOTS; i++) {
- luks->header.key_slots[i].active = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_DISABLED;
- luks->header.key_slots[i].stripes = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_STRIPES;
-
- /* This calculation doesn't match that shown in the spec,
- * but instead follows the cryptsetup implementation.
- */
- luks->header.key_slots[i].key_offset =
- (QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_OFFSET /
- QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE) +
- (ROUND_UP(DIV_ROUND_UP(splitkeylen, QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE),
- (QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_OFFSET /
- QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE)) * i);
+ QCryptoBlockLUKSKeySlot *slot = &luks->header.key_slots[i];
+ slot->active = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_DISABLED;
+ slot->key_offset = next_sector;
+ slot->stripes = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_STRIPES;
+ next_sector += splitkeylen_sectors(luks, QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_STRIPES);
}
@@ -1412,17 +1432,9 @@ qcrypto_block_luks_create(QCryptoBlock *block,
* slot headers, rounded up to the nearest sector, combined with
* the size of each master key material region, also rounded up
* to the nearest sector */
- luks->header.payload_offset =
- (QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_OFFSET /
- QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE) +
- (ROUND_UP(DIV_ROUND_UP(splitkeylen, QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE),
- (QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_OFFSET /
- QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE)) *
- QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_NUM_KEY_SLOTS);
-
+ luks->header.payload_offset = next_sector;
block->sector_size = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE;
- block->payload_offset = luks->header.payload_offset *
- block->sector_size;
+ block->payload_offset = luks->header.payload_offset * block->sector_size;
/* Reserve header space to match payload offset */
initfunc(block, block->payload_offset, opaque, &local_err);
--
2.17.2
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:22:10PM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> ---
> crypto/block-luks.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/crypto/block-luks.c b/crypto/block-luks.c
> index 6bb369f3b4..e1a4df94b7 100644
> --- a/crypto/block-luks.c
> +++ b/crypto/block-luks.c
> @@ -417,6 +417,33 @@ static int masterkeylen(QCryptoBlockLUKS *luks)
> }
>
>
> +/*
> + * Returns number of sectors needed to store the key material
> + * given number of anti forensic stripes
> + */
> +static int splitkeylen_sectors(QCryptoBlockLUKS *luks, int stripes)
Needs a qcrypto_block_luks_ prefix on method name.
I'd also put 'static int' on a separate line from method name
to reduce too long lines.
> +
> +{
> + /*
> + * This calculation doesn't match that shown in the spec,
> + * but instead follows the cryptsetup implementation.
> + */
> +
> + size_t header_sectors = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_OFFSET /
> + QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE;
Following line indent should only be 4 spaces
> +
> + size_t splitkeylen = masterkeylen(luks) * stripes;
> +
> + /* First align the key material size to block size*/
> + size_t splitkeylen_sectors =
> + DIV_ROUND_UP(splitkeylen, QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE);
Again 4 space indent.
> +
> + /* Then also align the key material size to the size of the header */
> + return ROUND_UP(splitkeylen_sectors, header_sectors);
> +}
> +
> +
> +
> /*
> * Stores the main LUKS header, taking care of endianess
> */
> @@ -1169,7 +1196,7 @@ qcrypto_block_luks_create(QCryptoBlock *block,
> QCryptoBlockCreateOptionsLUKS luks_opts;
> Error *local_err = NULL;
> uint8_t *masterkey = NULL;
> - size_t splitkeylen = 0;
> + size_t next_sector;
> size_t i;
> char *password;
> const char *cipher_alg;
> @@ -1388,23 +1415,16 @@ qcrypto_block_luks_create(QCryptoBlock *block,
> goto error;
> }
>
> + /* start with the sector that follows the header*/
> + next_sector = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_OFFSET /
> + QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE;
I'd suggest 'post_header_sector'
>
> - /* Although LUKS has multiple key slots, we're just going
> - * to use the first key slot */
> - splitkeylen = luks->header.key_bytes * QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_STRIPES;
> for (i = 0; i < QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_NUM_KEY_SLOTS; i++) {
> - luks->header.key_slots[i].active = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_DISABLED;
> - luks->header.key_slots[i].stripes = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_STRIPES;
> -
> - /* This calculation doesn't match that shown in the spec,
> - * but instead follows the cryptsetup implementation.
> - */
> - luks->header.key_slots[i].key_offset =
> - (QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_OFFSET /
> - QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE) +
> - (ROUND_UP(DIV_ROUND_UP(splitkeylen, QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE),
> - (QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_OFFSET /
> - QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE)) * i);
> + QCryptoBlockLUKSKeySlot *slot = &luks->header.key_slots[i];
> + slot->active = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_DISABLED;
> + slot->key_offset = next_sector;
> + slot->stripes = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_STRIPES;
> + next_sector += splitkeylen_sectors(luks, QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_STRIPES);
I'm not a fan of the next_sector accumulator .
I'd prefer to see the '* i' part done in splitkeylen_sectors, so that
we have
slot->key_offset = post_header_sector +
splitkeylen_sectors(luks, QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_STRIPES, i);
> @@ -1412,17 +1432,9 @@ qcrypto_block_luks_create(QCryptoBlock *block,
> * slot headers, rounded up to the nearest sector, combined with
> * the size of each master key material region, also rounded up
> * to the nearest sector */
> - luks->header.payload_offset =
> - (QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_OFFSET /
> - QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE) +
> - (ROUND_UP(DIV_ROUND_UP(splitkeylen, QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE),
> - (QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_OFFSET /
> - QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE)) *
> - QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_NUM_KEY_SLOTS);
> -
> + luks->header.payload_offset = next_sector;
luks->header.payload_offset = post_header_sector +
splitkeylen_sectors(luks, QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_STRIPES,
QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_NUM_KEY_SLOTS);
> block->sector_size = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE;
> - block->payload_offset = luks->header.payload_offset *
> - block->sector_size;
> + block->payload_offset = luks->header.payload_offset * block->sector_size;
This is reverting a whitspace change done in previous method
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
On Thu, 2019-08-22 at 11:47 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:22:10PM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > crypto/block-luks.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/crypto/block-luks.c b/crypto/block-luks.c
> > index 6bb369f3b4..e1a4df94b7 100644
> > --- a/crypto/block-luks.c
> > +++ b/crypto/block-luks.c
> > @@ -417,6 +417,33 @@ static int masterkeylen(QCryptoBlockLUKS *luks)
> > }
> >
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Returns number of sectors needed to store the key material
> > + * given number of anti forensic stripes
> > + */
> > +static int splitkeylen_sectors(QCryptoBlockLUKS *luks, int stripes)
>
> Needs a qcrypto_block_luks_ prefix on method name.
Done.
>
> I'd also put 'static int' on a separate line from method name
> to reduce too long lines.
Done.
>
> > +
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * This calculation doesn't match that shown in the spec,
> > + * but instead follows the cryptsetup implementation.
> > + */
> > +
> > + size_t header_sectors = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_OFFSET /
> > + QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE;
>
> Following line indent should only be 4 spaces
I didn't knew that. Fixed.
>
> > +
> > + size_t splitkeylen = masterkeylen(luks) * stripes;
> > +
> > + /* First align the key material size to block size*/
> > + size_t splitkeylen_sectors =
> > + DIV_ROUND_UP(splitkeylen, QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE);
>
> Again 4 space indent.
>
> > +
> > + /* Then also align the key material size to the size of the header */
> > + return ROUND_UP(splitkeylen_sectors, header_sectors);
> > +}
> > +
> > +
> > +
> > /*
> > * Stores the main LUKS header, taking care of endianess
> > */
> > @@ -1169,7 +1196,7 @@ qcrypto_block_luks_create(QCryptoBlock *block,
> > QCryptoBlockCreateOptionsLUKS luks_opts;
> > Error *local_err = NULL;
> > uint8_t *masterkey = NULL;
> > - size_t splitkeylen = 0;
> > + size_t next_sector;
> > size_t i;
> > char *password;
> > const char *cipher_alg;
> > @@ -1388,23 +1415,16 @@ qcrypto_block_luks_create(QCryptoBlock *block,
> > goto error;
> > }
> >
> > + /* start with the sector that follows the header*/
> > + next_sector = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_OFFSET /
> > + QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE;
>
> I'd suggest 'post_header_sector'
I called it now header_sectors, and each split key, split_key_sectors.
I hope that this is good enough.
>
> >
> > - /* Although LUKS has multiple key slots, we're just going
> > - * to use the first key slot */
> > - splitkeylen = luks->header.key_bytes * QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_STRIPES;
> > for (i = 0; i < QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_NUM_KEY_SLOTS; i++) {
> > - luks->header.key_slots[i].active = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_DISABLED;
> > - luks->header.key_slots[i].stripes = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_STRIPES;
> > -
> > - /* This calculation doesn't match that shown in the spec,
> > - * but instead follows the cryptsetup implementation.
> > - */
> > - luks->header.key_slots[i].key_offset =
> > - (QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_OFFSET /
> > - QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE) +
> > - (ROUND_UP(DIV_ROUND_UP(splitkeylen, QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE),
> > - (QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_OFFSET /
> > - QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE)) * i);
> > + QCryptoBlockLUKSKeySlot *slot = &luks->header.key_slots[i];
> > + slot->active = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_DISABLED;
> > + slot->key_offset = next_sector;
> > + slot->stripes = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_STRIPES;
> > + next_sector += splitkeylen_sectors(luks, QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_STRIPES);
>
> I'm not a fan of the next_sector accumulator .
I actually think that accumulator is cleaner here,
but I won't argue about this. Fixed.
>
> I'd prefer to see the '* i' part done in splitkeylen_sectors, so that
> we have
>
> slot->key_offset = post_header_sector +
> splitkeylen_sectors(luks, QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_STRIPES, i);
>
> > @@ -1412,17 +1432,9 @@ qcrypto_block_luks_create(QCryptoBlock *block,
> > * slot headers, rounded up to the nearest sector, combined with
> > * the size of each master key material region, also rounded up
> > * to the nearest sector */
> > - luks->header.payload_offset =
> > - (QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_OFFSET /
> > - QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE) +
> > - (ROUND_UP(DIV_ROUND_UP(splitkeylen, QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE),
> > - (QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_OFFSET /
> > - QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE)) *
> > - QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_NUM_KEY_SLOTS);
> > -
> > + luks->header.payload_offset = next_sector;
>
> luks->header.payload_offset = post_header_sector +
> splitkeylen_sectors(luks, QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_STRIPES,
> QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_NUM_KEY_SLOTS);
>
>
> > block->sector_size = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE;
> > - block->payload_offset = luks->header.payload_offset *
> > - block->sector_size;
> > + block->payload_offset = luks->header.payload_offset * block->sector_size;
>
>
> This is reverting a whitspace change done in previous method
True. Fixed.
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.