Currently we basically print IO address twice, fix this.
Fixes: 7e472264e9e2 ("PPC: spapr: iommu: rework traces")
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
---
hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c
index bd3d0256a65d..6fe57d799a10 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static IOMMUTLBEntry spapr_tce_translate_iommu(IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu,
ret.addr_mask = ~page_mask;
ret.perm = spapr_tce_iommu_access_flags(tce);
}
- trace_spapr_iommu_xlate(tcet->liobn, addr, ret.iova, ret.perm,
+ trace_spapr_iommu_xlate(tcet->liobn, addr, ret.translated_addr, ret.perm,
ret.addr_mask);
return ret;
--
2.17.1
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 03:42:02PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > Currently we basically print IO address twice, fix this. > > Fixes: 7e472264e9e2 ("PPC: spapr: iommu: rework traces") > Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Applied to ppc-for-4.2, thanks. > --- > hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c > index bd3d0256a65d..6fe57d799a10 100644 > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c > @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static IOMMUTLBEntry spapr_tce_translate_iommu(IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu, > ret.addr_mask = ~page_mask; > ret.perm = spapr_tce_iommu_access_flags(tce); > } > - trace_spapr_iommu_xlate(tcet->liobn, addr, ret.iova, ret.perm, > + trace_spapr_iommu_xlate(tcet->liobn, addr, ret.translated_addr, ret.perm, > ret.addr_mask); > > return ret; -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
Hi Alexey, On 8/12/19 7:42 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > Currently we basically print IO address twice, fix this. > > Fixes: 7e472264e9e2 ("PPC: spapr: iommu: rework traces") > Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> > --- > hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c > index bd3d0256a65d..6fe57d799a10 100644 > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c > @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static IOMMUTLBEntry spapr_tce_translate_iommu(IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu, > ret.addr_mask = ~page_mask; > ret.perm = spapr_tce_iommu_access_flags(tce); > } > - trace_spapr_iommu_xlate(tcet->liobn, addr, ret.iova, ret.perm, > + trace_spapr_iommu_xlate(tcet->liobn, addr, ret.translated_addr, ret.perm, > ret.addr_mask); But the trace format is: spapr_iommu_xlate(uint64_t liobn, uint64_t ioba, uint64_t tce, unsigned perm, unsigned pgsize) "liobn=%"PRIx64" 0x%"PRIx64" -> 0x%"PRIx64" perm=%u mask=%x" So this could be more appropriate: trace_spapr_iommu_xlate(tcet->liobn, ret.iova, ret.translated_addr, ret.perm, ret.addr_mask); Anyhow your patch is an improvment, so regardless addr/ret.iova: Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> > > return ret; >
On 12/08/2019 19:01, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Hi Alexey, > > On 8/12/19 7:42 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >> Currently we basically print IO address twice, fix this. >> >> Fixes: 7e472264e9e2 ("PPC: spapr: iommu: rework traces") >> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> >> --- >> hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c >> index bd3d0256a65d..6fe57d799a10 100644 >> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c >> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c >> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static IOMMUTLBEntry spapr_tce_translate_iommu(IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu, >> ret.addr_mask = ~page_mask; >> ret.perm = spapr_tce_iommu_access_flags(tce); >> } >> - trace_spapr_iommu_xlate(tcet->liobn, addr, ret.iova, ret.perm, >> + trace_spapr_iommu_xlate(tcet->liobn, addr, ret.translated_addr, ret.perm, >> ret.addr_mask); > > But the trace format is: > > spapr_iommu_xlate(uint64_t liobn, uint64_t ioba, uint64_t tce, unsigned > perm, unsigned pgsize) "liobn=%"PRIx64" 0x%"PRIx64" -> 0x%"PRIx64" > perm=%u mask=%x" > > So this could be more appropriate: > > trace_spapr_iommu_xlate(tcet->liobn, ret.iova, ret.translated_addr, > ret.perm, ret.addr_mask); > > Anyhow your patch is an improvment, so regardless addr/ret.iova: I'd rather want to see the raw input data than with some bits removed. > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Thanks! > >> >> return ret; >> -- Alexey
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.