migration/ram.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Rename for better understanding of the code.
Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
---
migration/ram.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
index c5f9f4b0ef..66792568e2 100644
--- a/migration/ram.c
+++ b/migration/ram.c
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ static inline bool migration_bitmap_clear_dirty(RAMState *rs,
return ret;
}
-static void migration_bitmap_sync_range(RAMState *rs, RAMBlock *rb,
+static void ramblock_sync_dirty_bitmap(RAMState *rs, RAMBlock *rb,
ram_addr_t length)
{
rs->migration_dirty_pages +=
@@ -1762,7 +1762,7 @@ static void migration_bitmap_sync(RAMState *rs)
qemu_mutex_lock(&rs->bitmap_mutex);
rcu_read_lock();
RAMBLOCK_FOREACH_NOT_IGNORED(block) {
- migration_bitmap_sync_range(rs, block, block->used_length);
+ ramblock_sync_dirty_bitmap(rs, block, block->used_length);
}
ram_counters.remaining = ram_bytes_remaining();
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -4175,7 +4175,7 @@ static void colo_flush_ram_cache(void)
memory_global_dirty_log_sync();
rcu_read_lock();
RAMBLOCK_FOREACH_NOT_IGNORED(block) {
- migration_bitmap_sync_range(ram_state, block, block->used_length);
+ ramblock_sync_dirty_bitmap(ram_state, block, block->used_length);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
--
2.17.1
* Wei Yang (richardw.yang@linux.intel.com) wrote: > Rename for better understanding of the code. > > Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> this needs fixing after 'just pass RAMBlock is enough' Dave > --- > migration/ram.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c > index c5f9f4b0ef..66792568e2 100644 > --- a/migration/ram.c > +++ b/migration/ram.c > @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ static inline bool migration_bitmap_clear_dirty(RAMState *rs, > return ret; > } > > -static void migration_bitmap_sync_range(RAMState *rs, RAMBlock *rb, > +static void ramblock_sync_dirty_bitmap(RAMState *rs, RAMBlock *rb, > ram_addr_t length) > { > rs->migration_dirty_pages += > @@ -1762,7 +1762,7 @@ static void migration_bitmap_sync(RAMState *rs) > qemu_mutex_lock(&rs->bitmap_mutex); > rcu_read_lock(); > RAMBLOCK_FOREACH_NOT_IGNORED(block) { > - migration_bitmap_sync_range(rs, block, block->used_length); > + ramblock_sync_dirty_bitmap(rs, block, block->used_length); > } > ram_counters.remaining = ram_bytes_remaining(); > rcu_read_unlock(); > @@ -4175,7 +4175,7 @@ static void colo_flush_ram_cache(void) > memory_global_dirty_log_sync(); > rcu_read_lock(); > RAMBLOCK_FOREACH_NOT_IGNORED(block) { > - migration_bitmap_sync_range(ram_state, block, block->used_length); > + ramblock_sync_dirty_bitmap(ram_state, block, block->used_length); > } > rcu_read_unlock(); > > -- > 2.17.1 > > -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 06:49:48PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: >* Wei Yang (richardw.yang@linux.intel.com) wrote: >> Rename for better understanding of the code. >> >> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> > >this needs fixing after 'just pass RAMBlock is enough' > Ok, I got your point. >Dave > >> --- >> migration/ram.c | 6 +++--- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c >> index c5f9f4b0ef..66792568e2 100644 >> --- a/migration/ram.c >> +++ b/migration/ram.c >> @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ static inline bool migration_bitmap_clear_dirty(RAMState *rs, >> return ret; >> } >> >> -static void migration_bitmap_sync_range(RAMState *rs, RAMBlock *rb, >> +static void ramblock_sync_dirty_bitmap(RAMState *rs, RAMBlock *rb, >> ram_addr_t length) >> { >> rs->migration_dirty_pages += >> @@ -1762,7 +1762,7 @@ static void migration_bitmap_sync(RAMState *rs) >> qemu_mutex_lock(&rs->bitmap_mutex); >> rcu_read_lock(); >> RAMBLOCK_FOREACH_NOT_IGNORED(block) { >> - migration_bitmap_sync_range(rs, block, block->used_length); >> + ramblock_sync_dirty_bitmap(rs, block, block->used_length); >> } >> ram_counters.remaining = ram_bytes_remaining(); >> rcu_read_unlock(); >> @@ -4175,7 +4175,7 @@ static void colo_flush_ram_cache(void) >> memory_global_dirty_log_sync(); >> rcu_read_lock(); >> RAMBLOCK_FOREACH_NOT_IGNORED(block) { >> - migration_bitmap_sync_range(ram_state, block, block->used_length); >> + ramblock_sync_dirty_bitmap(ram_state, block, block->used_length); >> } >> rcu_read_unlock(); >> >> -- >> 2.17.1 >> >> >-- >Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 06:49:48PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: >* Wei Yang (richardw.yang@linux.intel.com) wrote: >> Rename for better understanding of the code. >> >> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> > >this needs fixing after 'just pass RAMBlock is enough' > You mean rebase it? Hmm... let me take a look. >Dave > >> --- >> migration/ram.c | 6 +++--- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c >> index c5f9f4b0ef..66792568e2 100644 >> --- a/migration/ram.c >> +++ b/migration/ram.c >> @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ static inline bool migration_bitmap_clear_dirty(RAMState *rs, >> return ret; >> } >> >> -static void migration_bitmap_sync_range(RAMState *rs, RAMBlock *rb, >> +static void ramblock_sync_dirty_bitmap(RAMState *rs, RAMBlock *rb, >> ram_addr_t length) >> { >> rs->migration_dirty_pages += >> @@ -1762,7 +1762,7 @@ static void migration_bitmap_sync(RAMState *rs) >> qemu_mutex_lock(&rs->bitmap_mutex); >> rcu_read_lock(); >> RAMBLOCK_FOREACH_NOT_IGNORED(block) { >> - migration_bitmap_sync_range(rs, block, block->used_length); >> + ramblock_sync_dirty_bitmap(rs, block, block->used_length); >> } >> ram_counters.remaining = ram_bytes_remaining(); >> rcu_read_unlock(); >> @@ -4175,7 +4175,7 @@ static void colo_flush_ram_cache(void) >> memory_global_dirty_log_sync(); >> rcu_read_lock(); >> RAMBLOCK_FOREACH_NOT_IGNORED(block) { >> - migration_bitmap_sync_range(ram_state, block, block->used_length); >> + ramblock_sync_dirty_bitmap(ram_state, block, block->used_length); >> } >> rcu_read_unlock(); >> >> -- >> 2.17.1 >> >> >-- >Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.