Stop using cpu_F0s for NEON_2RM_VRECPE_F and NEON_2RM_VRSQRTE_F.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190613163917.28589-8-peter.maydell@linaro.org
---
 target/arm/translate.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/translate.c b/target/arm/translate.c
index 124045a9ef6..75ed7cc7cb0 100644
--- a/target/arm/translate.c
+++ b/target/arm/translate.c
@@ -4181,7 +4181,7 @@ static int neon_2rm_is_float_op(int op)
      * what we are asking here is "does the code for this case in
      * the Neon for-each-pass loop use cpu_F0s?".
      */
-    return op >= NEON_2RM_VRECPE_F;
+    return op >= NEON_2RM_VCVT_FS;
 }
 
 static bool neon_2rm_is_v8_op(int op)
@@ -6848,14 +6848,14 @@ static int disas_neon_data_insn(DisasContext *s, uint32_t insn)
                         case NEON_2RM_VRECPE_F:
                         {
                             TCGv_ptr fpstatus = get_fpstatus_ptr(1);
-                            gen_helper_recpe_f32(cpu_F0s, cpu_F0s, fpstatus);
+                            gen_helper_recpe_f32(tmp, tmp, fpstatus);
                             tcg_temp_free_ptr(fpstatus);
                             break;
                         }
                         case NEON_2RM_VRSQRTE_F:
                         {
                             TCGv_ptr fpstatus = get_fpstatus_ptr(1);
-                            gen_helper_rsqrte_f32(cpu_F0s, cpu_F0s, fpstatus);
+                            gen_helper_rsqrte_f32(tmp, tmp, fpstatus);
                             tcg_temp_free_ptr(fpstatus);
                             break;
                         }
-- 
2.20.1