Stop using cpu_F0s for the NEON_2RM_VCVT[ANPM][US] ops.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190613163917.28589-7-peter.maydell@linaro.org
---
 target/arm/translate.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/translate.c b/target/arm/translate.c
index 243dbee8357..124045a9ef6 100644
--- a/target/arm/translate.c
+++ b/target/arm/translate.c
@@ -4181,8 +4181,7 @@ static int neon_2rm_is_float_op(int op)
      * what we are asking here is "does the code for this case in
      * the Neon for-each-pass loop use cpu_F0s?".
      */
-    return ((op >= NEON_2RM_VCVTAU && op <= NEON_2RM_VCVTMS) ||
-            op >= NEON_2RM_VRECPE_F);
+    return op >= NEON_2RM_VRECPE_F;
 }
 
 static bool neon_2rm_is_v8_op(int op)
@@ -6818,10 +6817,10 @@ static int disas_neon_data_insn(DisasContext *s, uint32_t insn)
                                                       cpu_env);
 
                             if (is_signed) {
-                                gen_helper_vfp_tosls(cpu_F0s, cpu_F0s,
+                                gen_helper_vfp_tosls(tmp, tmp,
                                                      tcg_shift, fpst);
                             } else {
-                                gen_helper_vfp_touls(cpu_F0s, cpu_F0s,
+                                gen_helper_vfp_touls(tmp, tmp,
                                                      tcg_shift, fpst);
                             }
 
-- 
2.20.1