Pygments and Sphinx get pickier all the time; Sphinx 2.1+ now catches
these errors.

Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
---
 docs/interop/bitmaps.rst | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/interop/bitmaps.rst b/docs/interop/bitmaps.rst
index 510e8809a9..c29ac4a854 100644
--- a/docs/interop/bitmaps.rst
+++ b/docs/interop/bitmaps.rst
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ in any one source bitmap, the target bitmap will mark that segment dirty.
        "arguments": {
          "node": "drive0",
          "target": "new_bitmap",
-         "bitmaps: [ "bitmap0" ]
+         "bitmaps": [ "bitmap0" ]
        }
      }
 
@@ -1437,7 +1437,7 @@ applied:
    .. code:: json
 
     <- {
-         "timestamp": {...}
+         "timestamp": {...},
          "data": {
            "device": "drive0",
            "type": "backup",
-- 
2.20.1

04.06.2019 0:46, John Snow wrote:
> Pygments and Sphinx get pickier all the time; Sphinx 2.1+ now catches
> these errors.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

> ---
>   docs/interop/bitmaps.rst | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/docs/interop/bitmaps.rst b/docs/interop/bitmaps.rst
> index 510e8809a9..c29ac4a854 100644
> --- a/docs/interop/bitmaps.rst
> +++ b/docs/interop/bitmaps.rst
> @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ in any one source bitmap, the target bitmap will mark that segment dirty.
>          "arguments": {
>            "node": "drive0",
>            "target": "new_bitmap",
> -         "bitmaps: [ "bitmap0" ]
> +         "bitmaps": [ "bitmap0" ]
>          }
>        }
>   
> @@ -1437,7 +1437,7 @@ applied:
>      .. code:: json
>   
>       <- {
> -         "timestamp": {...}
> +         "timestamp": {...},
>            "data": {
>              "device": "drive0",
>              "type": "backup",
> 


-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir