Everyone:

I recently revisited my i.MX7 work and this series contains all of the
fixes I had to make to get it to work with latest (5.1-rc1) Linux
kernel again as well as fixes for genuine bugs that I somehow missed
during original submission ("pci: designware" patches). Hopefully each
patch is self-explanatory.

Feedback is welcome!

Thanks,
Andrey Smirnov

Andrey Smirnov (5):
  i.mx7d: Add no-op/unimplemented APBH DMA module
  i.mx7d: Add no-op/unimplemented PCIE PHY IP block
  pci: designware: Update MSI mapping unconditionally
  pci: designware: Update MSI mapping when MSI address changes
  i.mx7d: pci: Update PCI IRQ mapping to match HW

 include/hw/arm/fsl-imx7.h | 14 ++++++++++----
 hw/arm/fsl-imx7.c         | 11 +++++++++++
 hw/pci-host/designware.c  | 18 ++++++++----------
 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1

On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 6:39 PM Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Everyone:
>
> I recently revisited my i.MX7 work and this series contains all of the
> fixes I had to make to get it to work with latest (5.1-rc1) Linux
> kernel again as well as fixes for genuine bugs that I somehow missed
> during original submission ("pci: designware" patches). Hopefully each
> patch is self-explanatory.
>
> Feedback is welcome!
>

Is there any changes necessary for this to go in?

Thanks,
Andrey Smirnov

On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 01:27, Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 6:39 PM Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Everyone:
> >
> > I recently revisited my i.MX7 work and this series contains all of the
> > fixes I had to make to get it to work with latest (5.1-rc1) Linux
> > kernel again as well as fixes for genuine bugs that I somehow missed
> > during original submission ("pci: designware" patches). Hopefully each
> > patch is self-explanatory.
> >
> > Feedback is welcome!
> >
>
> Is there any changes necessary for this to go in?

Oops, sorry we missed this (for future patches you can feel free
to ping them after a couple of weeks of no response).

If you could reply to Philippe's query on patch 1 about the
correct value for FSL_IMX7_DMA_APBH_SIZE that would be great,
but since that's a very minor issue and we have softfreeze
for the next release tomorrow, I'm going to take these patches
into target-arm.next as they stand. We can fix the size value
with a followup patch if necessary.

thanks
-- PMM