On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:35:45PM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> We now have enough support to let the XSCOM test run on POWER9.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Applied, thanks.
> ---
> tests/pnv-xscom-test.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/pnv-xscom-test.c b/tests/pnv-xscom-test.c
> index 974f8da5b240..63d464048d53 100644
> --- a/tests/pnv-xscom-test.c
> +++ b/tests/pnv-xscom-test.c
> @@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ static const PnvChip pnv_chips[] = {
> .cfam_id = 0x120d304980000000ull,
> .first_core = 0x1,
> },
> -#if 0 /* POWER9 support is not ready yet */
> {
> .chip_type = PNV_CHIP_POWER9,
> .cpu_model = "POWER9",
> @@ -47,7 +46,6 @@ static const PnvChip pnv_chips[] = {
> .cfam_id = 0x220d104900008000ull,
> .first_core = 0x0,
> },
> -#endif
> };
>
> static uint64_t pnv_xscom_addr(const PnvChip *chip, uint32_t pcba)
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson