From: Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
When finished COLO failover, the status is FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED.
The origin codes misunderstand the FAILOVER_STATUS_REQUIRE.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
---
migration/colo.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/migration/colo.c b/migration/colo.c
index a916dc178c..a13acac192 100644
--- a/migration/colo.c
+++ b/migration/colo.c
@@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ static void secondary_vm_do_failover(void)
}
/* Notify COLO incoming thread that failover work is finished */
qemu_sem_post(&mis->colo_incoming_sem);
+
/* For Secondary VM, jump to incoming co */
if (mis->migration_incoming_co) {
qemu_coroutine_enter(mis->migration_incoming_co);
@@ -262,7 +263,7 @@ COLOStatus *qmp_query_colo_status(Error **errp)
case FAILOVER_STATUS_NONE:
s->reason = COLO_EXIT_REASON_NONE;
break;
- case FAILOVER_STATUS_REQUIRE:
+ case FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED:
s->reason = COLO_EXIT_REASON_REQUEST;
break;
default:
@@ -582,7 +583,7 @@ out:
qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_PRIMARY,
COLO_EXIT_REASON_ERROR);
break;
- case FAILOVER_STATUS_REQUIRE:
+ case FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED:
qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_PRIMARY,
COLO_EXIT_REASON_REQUEST);
break;
@@ -854,7 +855,7 @@ out:
qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_SECONDARY,
COLO_EXIT_REASON_ERROR);
break;
- case FAILOVER_STATUS_REQUIRE:
+ case FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED:
qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_SECONDARY,
COLO_EXIT_REASON_REQUEST);
break;
--
2.17.GIT
* Zhang Chen (chen.zhang@intel.com) wrote:
> From: Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
>
> When finished COLO failover, the status is FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED.
> The origin codes misunderstand the FAILOVER_STATUS_REQUIRE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
Why do these 'case's have to only deal with COMPLETED - what stops the
REQUIRE/ACTIVE states appearing when these routines check the status;
even if those states only happen for a short amount of time?
Dave
> ---
> migration/colo.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/colo.c b/migration/colo.c
> index a916dc178c..a13acac192 100644
> --- a/migration/colo.c
> +++ b/migration/colo.c
> @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ static void secondary_vm_do_failover(void)
> }
> /* Notify COLO incoming thread that failover work is finished */
> qemu_sem_post(&mis->colo_incoming_sem);
> +
> /* For Secondary VM, jump to incoming co */
> if (mis->migration_incoming_co) {
> qemu_coroutine_enter(mis->migration_incoming_co);
> @@ -262,7 +263,7 @@ COLOStatus *qmp_query_colo_status(Error **errp)
> case FAILOVER_STATUS_NONE:
> s->reason = COLO_EXIT_REASON_NONE;
> break;
> - case FAILOVER_STATUS_REQUIRE:
> + case FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED:
> s->reason = COLO_EXIT_REASON_REQUEST;
> break;
> default:
> @@ -582,7 +583,7 @@ out:
> qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_PRIMARY,
> COLO_EXIT_REASON_ERROR);
> break;
> - case FAILOVER_STATUS_REQUIRE:
> + case FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED:
> qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_PRIMARY,
> COLO_EXIT_REASON_REQUEST);
> break;
> @@ -854,7 +855,7 @@ out:
> qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_SECONDARY,
> COLO_EXIT_REASON_ERROR);
> break;
> - case FAILOVER_STATUS_REQUIRE:
> + case FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED:
> qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_SECONDARY,
> COLO_EXIT_REASON_REQUEST);
> break;
> --
> 2.17.GIT
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
-----Original Message-----
From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert [mailto:dgilbert@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 6:55 PM
To: Zhang, Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>; Zhang Chen <zhangckid@gmail.com>; Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>; zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>; qemu-dev <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Migration/colo.c: Fix COLO failover status error
* Zhang Chen (chen.zhang@intel.com) wrote:
> From: Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
>
> When finished COLO failover, the status is FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED.
> The origin codes misunderstand the FAILOVER_STATUS_REQUIRE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
Why do these 'case's have to only deal with COMPLETED - what stops the REQUIRE/ACTIVE states appearing when these routines check the status; even if those states only happen for a short amount of time?
Yes, other status just marked the failover processing. We can see colo_failover_bh(), the REQUIRE/ACTIVE only exist for a very short time.
Thanks
Zhang Chen
Dave
> ---
> migration/colo.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/colo.c b/migration/colo.c index
> a916dc178c..a13acac192 100644
> --- a/migration/colo.c
> +++ b/migration/colo.c
> @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ static void secondary_vm_do_failover(void)
> }
> /* Notify COLO incoming thread that failover work is finished */
> qemu_sem_post(&mis->colo_incoming_sem);
> +
> /* For Secondary VM, jump to incoming co */
> if (mis->migration_incoming_co) {
> qemu_coroutine_enter(mis->migration_incoming_co);
> @@ -262,7 +263,7 @@ COLOStatus *qmp_query_colo_status(Error **errp)
> case FAILOVER_STATUS_NONE:
> s->reason = COLO_EXIT_REASON_NONE;
> break;
> - case FAILOVER_STATUS_REQUIRE:
> + case FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED:
> s->reason = COLO_EXIT_REASON_REQUEST;
> break;
> default:
> @@ -582,7 +583,7 @@ out:
> qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_PRIMARY,
> COLO_EXIT_REASON_ERROR);
> break;
> - case FAILOVER_STATUS_REQUIRE:
> + case FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED:
> qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_PRIMARY,
> COLO_EXIT_REASON_REQUEST);
> break;
> @@ -854,7 +855,7 @@ out:
> qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_SECONDARY,
> COLO_EXIT_REASON_ERROR);
> break;
> - case FAILOVER_STATUS_REQUIRE:
> + case FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED:
> qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_SECONDARY,
> COLO_EXIT_REASON_REQUEST);
> break;
> --
> 2.17.GIT
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
* Zhang, Chen (chen.zhang@intel.com) wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert [mailto:dgilbert@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 6:55 PM
> To: Zhang, Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
> Cc: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>; Zhang Chen <zhangckid@gmail.com>; Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>; zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>; qemu-dev <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Migration/colo.c: Fix COLO failover status error
>
> * Zhang Chen (chen.zhang@intel.com) wrote:
> > From: Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
> >
> > When finished COLO failover, the status is FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED.
> > The origin codes misunderstand the FAILOVER_STATUS_REQUIRE.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
>
> > Why do these 'case's have to only deal with COMPLETED - what stops the REQUIRE/ACTIVE states appearing when these routines check the status; even if those states only happen for a short amount of time?
>
> Yes, other status just marked the failover processing. We can see colo_failover_bh(), the REQUIRE/ACTIVE only exist for a very short time.
But those other states do exist - so don't these case statements have to
do something with them?
Dave
>
> Thanks
> Zhang Chen
>
> Dave
>
> > ---
> > migration/colo.c | 7 ++++---
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/migration/colo.c b/migration/colo.c index
> > a916dc178c..a13acac192 100644
> > --- a/migration/colo.c
> > +++ b/migration/colo.c
> > @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ static void secondary_vm_do_failover(void)
> > }
> > /* Notify COLO incoming thread that failover work is finished */
> > qemu_sem_post(&mis->colo_incoming_sem);
> > +
> > /* For Secondary VM, jump to incoming co */
> > if (mis->migration_incoming_co) {
> > qemu_coroutine_enter(mis->migration_incoming_co);
> > @@ -262,7 +263,7 @@ COLOStatus *qmp_query_colo_status(Error **errp)
> > case FAILOVER_STATUS_NONE:
> > s->reason = COLO_EXIT_REASON_NONE;
> > break;
> > - case FAILOVER_STATUS_REQUIRE:
> > + case FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED:
> > s->reason = COLO_EXIT_REASON_REQUEST;
> > break;
> > default:
> > @@ -582,7 +583,7 @@ out:
> > qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_PRIMARY,
> > COLO_EXIT_REASON_ERROR);
> > break;
> > - case FAILOVER_STATUS_REQUIRE:
> > + case FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED:
> > qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_PRIMARY,
> > COLO_EXIT_REASON_REQUEST);
> > break;
> > @@ -854,7 +855,7 @@ out:
> > qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_SECONDARY,
> > COLO_EXIT_REASON_ERROR);
> > break;
> > - case FAILOVER_STATUS_REQUIRE:
> > + case FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED:
> > qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_SECONDARY,
> > COLO_EXIT_REASON_REQUEST);
> > break;
> > --
> > 2.17.GIT
> >
> --
> Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
-----Original Message-----
From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert [mailto:dgilbert@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 9:03 PM
To: Zhang, Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>; Zhang Chen <zhangckid@gmail.com>; Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>; zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>; qemu-dev <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Migration/colo.c: Fix COLO failover status error
* Zhang, Chen (chen.zhang@intel.com) wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert [mailto:dgilbert@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 6:55 PM
> To: Zhang, Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
> Cc: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>; Zhang Chen
> <zhangckid@gmail.com>; Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>;
> zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>; qemu-dev
> <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Migration/colo.c: Fix COLO failover status
> error
>
> * Zhang Chen (chen.zhang@intel.com) wrote:
> > From: Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
> >
> > When finished COLO failover, the status is FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED.
> > The origin codes misunderstand the FAILOVER_STATUS_REQUIRE.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
>
> > Why do these 'case's have to only deal with COMPLETED - what stops the REQUIRE/ACTIVE states appearing when these routines check the status; even if those states only happen for a short amount of time?
>
> Yes, other status just marked the failover processing. We can see colo_failover_bh(), the REQUIRE/ACTIVE only exist for a very short time.
But those other states do exist - so don't these case statements have to do something with them?
Yes, you are right.
I will add another one patch to handle other states in this series next version.
Thanks
Zhang Chen
Dave
>
> Thanks
> Zhang Chen
>
> Dave
>
> > ---
> > migration/colo.c | 7 ++++---
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/migration/colo.c b/migration/colo.c index
> > a916dc178c..a13acac192 100644
> > --- a/migration/colo.c
> > +++ b/migration/colo.c
> > @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ static void secondary_vm_do_failover(void)
> > }
> > /* Notify COLO incoming thread that failover work is finished */
> > qemu_sem_post(&mis->colo_incoming_sem);
> > +
> > /* For Secondary VM, jump to incoming co */
> > if (mis->migration_incoming_co) {
> > qemu_coroutine_enter(mis->migration_incoming_co);
> > @@ -262,7 +263,7 @@ COLOStatus *qmp_query_colo_status(Error **errp)
> > case FAILOVER_STATUS_NONE:
> > s->reason = COLO_EXIT_REASON_NONE;
> > break;
> > - case FAILOVER_STATUS_REQUIRE:
> > + case FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED:
> > s->reason = COLO_EXIT_REASON_REQUEST;
> > break;
> > default:
> > @@ -582,7 +583,7 @@ out:
> > qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_PRIMARY,
> > COLO_EXIT_REASON_ERROR);
> > break;
> > - case FAILOVER_STATUS_REQUIRE:
> > + case FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED:
> > qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_PRIMARY,
> > COLO_EXIT_REASON_REQUEST);
> > break;
> > @@ -854,7 +855,7 @@ out:
> > qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_SECONDARY,
> > COLO_EXIT_REASON_ERROR);
> > break;
> > - case FAILOVER_STATUS_REQUIRE:
> > + case FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED:
> > qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_SECONDARY,
> > COLO_EXIT_REASON_REQUEST);
> > break;
> > --
> > 2.17.GIT
> >
> --
> Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.