io/channel-websock.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
We were never reporting the G_IO_HUP event when an end of file was hit
on the websocket channel.
We also ddn't report G_IO_ERR when we hit a fatal error processing the
websocket protocol.
The latter in particular meant that the chardev code would not notice
when an eof/error was encountered on the websocket channel, unless the
guest OS happened to trigger a write operation.
This meant that once the first client had quit, the chardev would never
listen to accept a new client.
Fixes launchpad bug 1816819
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
---
io/channel-websock.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/io/channel-websock.c b/io/channel-websock.c
index dc43dc6bb9..fc4c3dcaa5 100644
--- a/io/channel-websock.c
+++ b/io/channel-websock.c
@@ -1225,12 +1225,18 @@ qio_channel_websock_source_check(GSource *source)
QIOChannelWebsockSource *wsource = (QIOChannelWebsockSource *)source;
GIOCondition cond = 0;
- if (wsource->wioc->rawinput.offset || wsource->wioc->io_eof) {
+ if (wsource->wioc->rawinput.offset) {
cond |= G_IO_IN;
}
if (wsource->wioc->encoutput.offset < QIO_CHANNEL_WEBSOCK_MAX_BUFFER) {
cond |= G_IO_OUT;
}
+ if (wsource->wioc->io_eof) {
+ cond |= G_IO_IN | G_IO_HUP;
+ }
+ if (wsource->wioc->io_err) {
+ cond |= G_IO_IN | G_IO_ERR;
+ }
return cond & wsource->condition;
}
--
2.20.1
Hi Daniel,
On 2/20/19 7:25 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> We were never reporting the G_IO_HUP event when an end of file was hit
> on the websocket channel.
>
> We also ddn't report G_IO_ERR when we hit a fatal error processing the
"didn't report"
> websocket protocol.
>
> The latter in particular meant that the chardev code would not notice
> when an eof/error was encountered on the websocket channel, unless the
> guest OS happened to trigger a write operation.
>
> This meant that once the first client had quit, the chardev would never
> listen to accept a new client.
>
> Fixes launchpad bug 1816819
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> ---
> io/channel-websock.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/io/channel-websock.c b/io/channel-websock.c
> index dc43dc6bb9..fc4c3dcaa5 100644
> --- a/io/channel-websock.c
> +++ b/io/channel-websock.c
> @@ -1225,12 +1225,18 @@ qio_channel_websock_source_check(GSource *source)
> QIOChannelWebsockSource *wsource = (QIOChannelWebsockSource *)source;
> GIOCondition cond = 0;
>
> - if (wsource->wioc->rawinput.offset || wsource->wioc->io_eof) {
> + if (wsource->wioc->rawinput.offset) {
> cond |= G_IO_IN;
> }
> if (wsource->wioc->encoutput.offset < QIO_CHANNEL_WEBSOCK_MAX_BUFFER) {
> cond |= G_IO_OUT;
> }
> + if (wsource->wioc->io_eof) {
> + cond |= G_IO_IN | G_IO_HUP;
Shouldn't this be:
cond |= G_IO_HUP;
> + }
> + if (wsource->wioc->io_err) {
> + cond |= G_IO_IN | G_IO_ERR;
Ditto:
cond |= G_IO_ERR;
> + }
>
> return cond & wsource->condition;
> }
>
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 08:52:34PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 2/20/19 7:25 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > We were never reporting the G_IO_HUP event when an end of file was hit
> > on the websocket channel.
> >
> > We also ddn't report G_IO_ERR when we hit a fatal error processing the
>
> "didn't report"
>
> > websocket protocol.
> >
> > The latter in particular meant that the chardev code would not notice
> > when an eof/error was encountered on the websocket channel, unless the
> > guest OS happened to trigger a write operation.
> >
> > This meant that once the first client had quit, the chardev would never
> > listen to accept a new client.
> >
> > Fixes launchpad bug 1816819
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > io/channel-websock.c | 8 +++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/io/channel-websock.c b/io/channel-websock.c
> > index dc43dc6bb9..fc4c3dcaa5 100644
> > --- a/io/channel-websock.c
> > +++ b/io/channel-websock.c
> > @@ -1225,12 +1225,18 @@ qio_channel_websock_source_check(GSource *source)
> > QIOChannelWebsockSource *wsource = (QIOChannelWebsockSource *)source;
> > GIOCondition cond = 0;
> >
> > - if (wsource->wioc->rawinput.offset || wsource->wioc->io_eof) {
> > + if (wsource->wioc->rawinput.offset) {
> > cond |= G_IO_IN;
> > }
> > if (wsource->wioc->encoutput.offset < QIO_CHANNEL_WEBSOCK_MAX_BUFFER) {
> > cond |= G_IO_OUT;
> > }
> > + if (wsource->wioc->io_eof) {
> > + cond |= G_IO_IN | G_IO_HUP;
>
> Shouldn't this be:
>
> cond |= G_IO_HUP;
With regular poll() on FD I believe you typically get POLLIN | POLLHUP as
a pair.
>
> > + }
> > + if (wsource->wioc->io_err) {
> > + cond |= G_IO_IN | G_IO_ERR;
>
> Ditto:
>
> cond |= G_IO_ERR;
And I just followed the same practice here.
> > + }
> >
> > return cond & wsource->condition;
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.