[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5] blockdev: acquire aio_context for bitmap add/remove

John Snow posted 1 patch 5 years, 2 months ago
Test asan passed
Test docker-clang@ubuntu failed
Test docker-mingw@fedora passed
Test checkpatch passed
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu tags/patchew/20190218233154.19303-1-jsnow@redhat.com
Maintainers: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
blockdev.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5] blockdev: acquire aio_context for bitmap add/remove
Posted by John Snow 5 years, 2 months ago
When bitmaps are persistent, they may incur a disk read or write when bitmaps
are added or removed. For configurations like virtio-dataplane, failing to
acquire this lock will abort QEMU when disk IO occurs.

We used to acquire aio_context as part of the bitmap lookup, so re-introduce
the lock for just the cases that have an IO penalty. Commit 2119882c removed
these locks, and I failed to notice this when we committed fd5ae4cc, so this
has been broken since persistent bitmaps were introduced.

Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672010
Reported-By: Aihua Liang <aliang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
---
v5: I'm having a really bad day. This version actually has the semicolon.
---
 blockdev.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/blockdev.c b/blockdev.c
index fb18e9c975..8714ad2702 100644
--- a/blockdev.c
+++ b/blockdev.c
@@ -2820,6 +2820,7 @@ void qmp_block_dirty_bitmap_add(const char *node, const char *name,
 {
     BlockDriverState *bs;
     BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap;
+    AioContext *aio_context = NULL;
 
     if (!name || name[0] == '\0') {
         error_setg(errp, "Bitmap name cannot be empty");
@@ -2854,15 +2855,17 @@ void qmp_block_dirty_bitmap_add(const char *node, const char *name,
         disabled = false;
     }
 
-    if (persistent &&
-        !bdrv_can_store_new_dirty_bitmap(bs, name, granularity, errp))
-    {
-        return;
+    if (persistent) {
+        aio_context = bdrv_get_aio_context(bs);
+        aio_context_acquire(aio_context);
+        if (!bdrv_can_store_new_dirty_bitmap(bs, name, granularity, errp)) {
+            goto out;
+        }
     }
 
     bitmap = bdrv_create_dirty_bitmap(bs, granularity, name, errp);
     if (bitmap == NULL) {
-        return;
+        goto out;
     }
 
     if (disabled) {
@@ -2870,6 +2873,10 @@ void qmp_block_dirty_bitmap_add(const char *node, const char *name,
     }
 
     bdrv_dirty_bitmap_set_persistance(bitmap, persistent);
+ out:
+    if (aio_context) {
+        aio_context_release(aio_context);
+    }
 }
 
 void qmp_block_dirty_bitmap_remove(const char *node, const char *name,
@@ -2878,6 +2885,7 @@ void qmp_block_dirty_bitmap_remove(const char *node, const char *name,
     BlockDriverState *bs;
     BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap;
     Error *local_err = NULL;
+    AioContext *aio_context = NULL;
 
     bitmap = block_dirty_bitmap_lookup(node, name, &bs, errp);
     if (!bitmap || !bs) {
@@ -2892,14 +2900,20 @@ void qmp_block_dirty_bitmap_remove(const char *node, const char *name,
     }
 
     if (bdrv_dirty_bitmap_get_persistance(bitmap)) {
+        aio_context = bdrv_get_aio_context(bs);
+        aio_context_acquire(aio_context);
         bdrv_remove_persistent_dirty_bitmap(bs, name, &local_err);
         if (local_err != NULL) {
             error_propagate(errp, local_err);
-            return;
+            goto out;
         }
     }
 
     bdrv_release_dirty_bitmap(bs, bitmap);
+ out:
+    if (aio_context) {
+        aio_context_release(aio_context);
+    }
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.17.2


Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5] blockdev: acquire aio_context for bitmap add/remove
Posted by Eric Blake 5 years, 2 months ago
On 2/18/19 5:31 PM, John Snow wrote:
> When bitmaps are persistent, they may incur a disk read or write when bitmaps
> are added or removed. For configurations like virtio-dataplane, failing to
> acquire this lock will abort QEMU when disk IO occurs.
> 
> We used to acquire aio_context as part of the bitmap lookup, so re-introduce
> the lock for just the cases that have an IO penalty. Commit 2119882c removed
> these locks, and I failed to notice this when we committed fd5ae4cc, so this
> has been broken since persistent bitmaps were introduced.
> 
> Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672010
> Reported-By: Aihua Liang <aliang@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
> ---
> v5: I'm having a really bad day. This version actually has the semicolon.
> ---
>  blockdev.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>

and yes, this time it builds.

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5] blockdev: acquire aio_context for bitmap add/remove
Posted by John Snow 5 years, 2 months ago

On 2/19/19 9:59 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 2/18/19 5:31 PM, John Snow wrote:
>> When bitmaps are persistent, they may incur a disk read or write when bitmaps
>> are added or removed. For configurations like virtio-dataplane, failing to
>> acquire this lock will abort QEMU when disk IO occurs.
>>
>> We used to acquire aio_context as part of the bitmap lookup, so re-introduce
>> the lock for just the cases that have an IO penalty. Commit 2119882c removed
>> these locks, and I failed to notice this when we committed fd5ae4cc, so this
>> has been broken since persistent bitmaps were introduced.
>>
>> Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672010
>> Reported-By: Aihua Liang <aliang@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> v5: I'm having a really bad day. This version actually has the semicolon.
>> ---
>>  blockdev.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> 
> and yes, this time it builds.
> 

I am really very sorry for the noise on this simple series. Thank you
for the review and your patience.

--John