When we get a solicited interrupt, the start function may have
been cleared by a csch, but we still have a channel program
structure allocated. Make it safe to call the cp accessors in
any case, so we can call them unconditionally.
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
---
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 3 +++
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
index 70a006ba4d05..714987ceea9a 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
@@ -335,6 +335,7 @@ static void cp_unpin_free(struct channel_program *cp)
struct ccwchain *chain, *temp;
int i;
+ cp->initialized = false;
list_for_each_entry_safe(chain, temp, &cp->ccwchain_list, next) {
for (i = 0; i < chain->ch_len; i++) {
pfn_array_table_unpin_free(chain->ch_pat + i,
@@ -701,6 +702,8 @@ int cp_init(struct channel_program *cp, struct device *mdev, union orb *orb)
*/
cp->orb.cmd.c64 = 1;
+ cp->initialized = true;
+
return ret;
}
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h
index a4b74fb1aa57..3c20cd208da5 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
* @ccwchain_list: list head of ccwchains
* @orb: orb for the currently processed ssch request
* @mdev: the mediated device to perform page pinning/unpinning
+ * @initialized: whether this instance is actually initialized
*
* @ccwchain_list is the head of a ccwchain list, that contents the
* translated result of the guest channel program that pointed out by
@@ -30,6 +31,7 @@ struct channel_program {
struct list_head ccwchain_list;
union orb orb;
struct device *mdev;
+ bool initialized;
};
extern int cp_init(struct channel_program *cp, struct device *mdev,
--
2.17.2
On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:03:50 +0100
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
> When we get a solicited interrupt, the start function may have
> been cleared by a csch, but we still have a channel program
> structure allocated. Make it safe to call the cp accessors in
> any case, so we can call them unconditionally.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 3 +++
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
> index 70a006ba4d05..714987ceea9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
> @@ -335,6 +335,7 @@ static void cp_unpin_free(struct channel_program *cp)
> struct ccwchain *chain, *temp;
> int i;
>
> + cp->initialized = false;
> list_for_each_entry_safe(chain, temp, &cp->ccwchain_list, next) {
> for (i = 0; i < chain->ch_len; i++) {
> pfn_array_table_unpin_free(chain->ch_pat + i,
> @@ -701,6 +702,8 @@ int cp_init(struct channel_program *cp, struct device *mdev, union orb *orb)
> */
> cp->orb.cmd.c64 = 1;
>
> + cp->initialized = true;
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h
> index a4b74fb1aa57..3c20cd208da5 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> * @ccwchain_list: list head of ccwchains
> * @orb: orb for the currently processed ssch request
> * @mdev: the mediated device to perform page pinning/unpinning
> + * @initialized: whether this instance is actually initialized
> *
> * @ccwchain_list is the head of a ccwchain list, that contents the
> * translated result of the guest channel program that pointed out by
> @@ -30,6 +31,7 @@ struct channel_program {
> struct list_head ccwchain_list;
> union orb orb;
> struct device *mdev;
> + bool initialized;
> };
>
> extern int cp_init(struct channel_program *cp, struct device *mdev,
I fail to see how is this patch delivering on the promise made by it's
title. I see only code that sets cp->initialized but none that reads it.
The follow-up patches don't seem to care for cp->initialized either.
Regards,
Halil
On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:56:56 +0100
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:03:50 +0100
> Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > When we get a solicited interrupt, the start function may have
> > been cleared by a csch, but we still have a channel program
> > structure allocated. Make it safe to call the cp accessors in
> > any case, so we can call them unconditionally.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 3 +++
> > drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
> > index 70a006ba4d05..714987ceea9a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
> > @@ -335,6 +335,7 @@ static void cp_unpin_free(struct channel_program *cp)
> > struct ccwchain *chain, *temp;
> > int i;
> >
> > + cp->initialized = false;
> > list_for_each_entry_safe(chain, temp, &cp->ccwchain_list, next) {
> > for (i = 0; i < chain->ch_len; i++) {
> > pfn_array_table_unpin_free(chain->ch_pat + i,
> > @@ -701,6 +702,8 @@ int cp_init(struct channel_program *cp, struct device *mdev, union orb *orb)
> > */
> > cp->orb.cmd.c64 = 1;
> >
> > + cp->initialized = true;
> > +
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h
> > index a4b74fb1aa57..3c20cd208da5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h
> > +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> > * @ccwchain_list: list head of ccwchains
> > * @orb: orb for the currently processed ssch request
> > * @mdev: the mediated device to perform page pinning/unpinning
> > + * @initialized: whether this instance is actually initialized
> > *
> > * @ccwchain_list is the head of a ccwchain list, that contents the
> > * translated result of the guest channel program that pointed out by
> > @@ -30,6 +31,7 @@ struct channel_program {
> > struct list_head ccwchain_list;
> > union orb orb;
> > struct device *mdev;
> > + bool initialized;
> > };
> >
> > extern int cp_init(struct channel_program *cp, struct device *mdev,
>
> I fail to see how is this patch delivering on the promise made by it's
> title. I see only code that sets cp->initialized but none that reads it.
> The follow-up patches don't seem to care for cp->initialized either.
Grr, has been lost in the rebase. I'll redo this.
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.