Assert that the return value is not an error. This is like commit
7e6478e7d4f for qemu_set_cloexec.
Signed-off-by: Li Qiang <liq3ea@163.com>
---
util/oslib-posix.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/util/oslib-posix.c b/util/oslib-posix.c
index c1bee2a581..4ce1ba9ca4 100644
--- a/util/oslib-posix.c
+++ b/util/oslib-posix.c
@@ -233,14 +233,18 @@ void qemu_set_block(int fd)
{
int f;
f = fcntl(fd, F_GETFL);
- fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, f & ~O_NONBLOCK);
+ assert(f != -1);
+ f = fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, f & ~O_NONBLOCK);
+ assert(f != -1);
}
void qemu_set_nonblock(int fd)
{
int f;
f = fcntl(fd, F_GETFL);
- fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, f | O_NONBLOCK);
+ assert(f != -1);
+ f = fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, f | O_NONBLOCK);
+ assert(f != -1);
}
int socket_set_fast_reuse(int fd)
--
2.17.1
On 2018-12-15 13:03, Li Qiang wrote:
> Assert that the return value is not an error. This is like commit
> 7e6478e7d4f for qemu_set_cloexec.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Qiang <liq3ea@163.com>
> ---
> util/oslib-posix.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/util/oslib-posix.c b/util/oslib-posix.c
> index c1bee2a581..4ce1ba9ca4 100644
> --- a/util/oslib-posix.c
> +++ b/util/oslib-posix.c
> @@ -233,14 +233,18 @@ void qemu_set_block(int fd)
> {
> int f;
> f = fcntl(fd, F_GETFL);
> - fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, f & ~O_NONBLOCK);
> + assert(f != -1);
> + f = fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, f & ~O_NONBLOCK);
> + assert(f != -1);
> }
>
> void qemu_set_nonblock(int fd)
> {
> int f;
> f = fcntl(fd, F_GETFL);
> - fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, f | O_NONBLOCK);
> + assert(f != -1);
> + f = fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, f | O_NONBLOCK);
> + assert(f != -1);
> }
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Michael, could you take this patch series through your vhost tree? Or
shall I pick them up for the qtests tree? In the latter case, please
provide an ACK for the second patch.
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 03:07:24PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 2018-12-15 13:03, Li Qiang wrote:
> > Assert that the return value is not an error. This is like commit
> > 7e6478e7d4f for qemu_set_cloexec.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Li Qiang <liq3ea@163.com>
> > ---
> > util/oslib-posix.c | 8 ++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/util/oslib-posix.c b/util/oslib-posix.c
> > index c1bee2a581..4ce1ba9ca4 100644
> > --- a/util/oslib-posix.c
> > +++ b/util/oslib-posix.c
> > @@ -233,14 +233,18 @@ void qemu_set_block(int fd)
> > {
> > int f;
> > f = fcntl(fd, F_GETFL);
> > - fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, f & ~O_NONBLOCK);
> > + assert(f != -1);
> > + f = fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, f & ~O_NONBLOCK);
> > + assert(f != -1);
> > }
> >
> > void qemu_set_nonblock(int fd)
> > {
> > int f;
> > f = fcntl(fd, F_GETFL);
> > - fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, f | O_NONBLOCK);
> > + assert(f != -1);
> > + f = fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, f | O_NONBLOCK);
> > + assert(f != -1);
> > }
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>
> Michael, could you take this patch series through your vhost tree? Or
> shall I pick them up for the qtests tree? In the latter case, please
> provide an ACK for the second patch.
Pls go ahead and merge it.
--
MST
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 03:07:24PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 2018-12-15 13:03, Li Qiang wrote:
> > Assert that the return value is not an error. This is like commit
> > 7e6478e7d4f for qemu_set_cloexec.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Li Qiang <liq3ea@163.com>
> > ---
> > util/oslib-posix.c | 8 ++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/util/oslib-posix.c b/util/oslib-posix.c
> > index c1bee2a581..4ce1ba9ca4 100644
> > --- a/util/oslib-posix.c
> > +++ b/util/oslib-posix.c
> > @@ -233,14 +233,18 @@ void qemu_set_block(int fd)
> > {
> > int f;
> > f = fcntl(fd, F_GETFL);
> > - fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, f & ~O_NONBLOCK);
> > + assert(f != -1);
> > + f = fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, f & ~O_NONBLOCK);
> > + assert(f != -1);
> > }
> >
> > void qemu_set_nonblock(int fd)
> > {
> > int f;
> > f = fcntl(fd, F_GETFL);
> > - fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, f | O_NONBLOCK);
> > + assert(f != -1);
> > + f = fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, f | O_NONBLOCK);
> > + assert(f != -1);
> > }
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>
> Michael, could you take this patch series through your vhost tree? Or
> shall I pick them up for the qtests tree? In the latter case, please
> provide an ACK for the second patch.
Did not see it merged so I merged it.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.