The e1000 driver calls memory_region_add_coalescing but
kvm_coalesce_mmio_region never been called for those regions.
Update coalesced_range on memory_region_transaction_commit to fix this.
It seems very old bug since memory region API
was merged on commit 093bc2cd885e ("Hierarchical memory region API").
Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <atsushi.nemoto@sord.co.jp>
---
memory.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/memory.c b/memory.c
index d14c6dec1d..f773b0be50 100644
--- a/memory.c
+++ b/memory.c
@@ -1021,6 +1021,8 @@ void memory_region_transaction_begin(void)
++memory_region_transaction_depth;
}
+static void memory_region_update_coalesced_range_as(MemoryRegion *mr, AddressSpace *as);
+
void memory_region_transaction_commit(void)
{
AddressSpace *as;
@@ -1038,6 +1040,7 @@ void memory_region_transaction_commit(void)
QTAILQ_FOREACH(as, &address_spaces, address_spaces_link) {
address_space_set_flatview(as);
address_space_update_ioeventfds(as);
+ memory_region_update_coalesced_range_as(NULL, as);
}
memory_region_update_pending = false;
ioeventfd_update_pending = false;
@@ -2142,7 +2145,7 @@ static void memory_region_update_coalesced_range_as(MemoryRegion *mr, AddressSpa
view = address_space_get_flatview(as);
FOR_EACH_FLAT_RANGE(fr, view) {
- if (fr->mr == mr) {
+ if (fr->mr == mr || (!mr && !QTAILQ_EMPTY(&fr->mr->coalesced))) {
section = (MemoryRegionSection) {
.fv = view,
.offset_within_address_space = int128_get64(fr->addr.start),
@@ -2152,7 +2155,7 @@ static void memory_region_update_coalesced_range_as(MemoryRegion *mr, AddressSpa
MEMORY_LISTENER_CALL(as, coalesced_io_del, Reverse, §ion,
int128_get64(fr->addr.start),
int128_get64(fr->addr.size));
- QTAILQ_FOREACH(cmr, &mr->coalesced, link) {
+ QTAILQ_FOREACH(cmr, &fr->mr->coalesced, link) {
tmp = addrrange_shift(cmr->addr,
int128_sub(fr->addr.start,
int128_make64(fr->offset_in_region)));
--
2.11.0
On 28/11/18 10:17, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
> The e1000 driver calls memory_region_add_coalescing but
> kvm_coalesce_mmio_region never been called for those regions.
>
> Update coalesced_range on memory_region_transaction_commit to fix this.
>
> It seems very old bug since memory region API
> was merged on commit 093bc2cd885e ("Hierarchical memory region API").
>
> Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <atsushi.nemoto@sord.co.jp>
I attach the patch I came up with. What do you think?
Thanks,
Paolo
> memory.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/memory.c b/memory.c
> index d14c6dec1d..f773b0be50 100644
> --- a/memory.c
> +++ b/memory.c
> @@ -1021,6 +1021,8 @@ void memory_region_transaction_begin(void)
> ++memory_region_transaction_depth;
> }
>
> +static void memory_region_update_coalesced_range_as(MemoryRegion *mr, AddressSpace *as);
> +
> void memory_region_transaction_commit(void)
> {
> AddressSpace *as;
> @@ -1038,6 +1040,7 @@ void memory_region_transaction_commit(void)
> QTAILQ_FOREACH(as, &address_spaces, address_spaces_link) {
> address_space_set_flatview(as);
> address_space_update_ioeventfds(as);
> + memory_region_update_coalesced_range_as(NULL, as);
> }
> memory_region_update_pending = false;
> ioeventfd_update_pending = false;
> @@ -2142,7 +2145,7 @@ static void memory_region_update_coalesced_range_as(MemoryRegion *mr, AddressSpa
>
> view = address_space_get_flatview(as);
> FOR_EACH_FLAT_RANGE(fr, view) {
> - if (fr->mr == mr) {
> + if (fr->mr == mr || (!mr && !QTAILQ_EMPTY(&fr->mr->coalesced))) {
> section = (MemoryRegionSection) {
> .fv = view,
> .offset_within_address_space = int128_get64(fr->addr.start),
> @@ -2152,7 +2155,7 @@ static void memory_region_update_coalesced_range_as(MemoryRegion *mr, AddressSpa
> MEMORY_LISTENER_CALL(as, coalesced_io_del, Reverse, §ion,
> int128_get64(fr->addr.start),
> int128_get64(fr->addr.size));
> - QTAILQ_FOREACH(cmr, &mr->coalesced, link) {
> + QTAILQ_FOREACH(cmr, &fr->mr->coalesced, link) {
> tmp = addrrange_shift(cmr->addr,
> int128_sub(fr->addr.start,
> int128_make64(fr->offset_in_region)));
>
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 17:30:59 +0100, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>> The e1000 driver calls memory_region_add_coalescing but
>> kvm_coalesce_mmio_region never been called for those regions.
>>
>> Update coalesced_range on memory_region_transaction_commit to fix this.
>>
>> It seems very old bug since memory region API
>> was merged on commit 093bc2cd885e ("Hierarchical memory region API").
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <atsushi.nemoto@sord.co.jp>
>
> I attach the patch I came up with. What do you think?
Thank you for the alternative fix.
It works well and looks good to me.
---
Atsushi Nemoto
On 28/11/18 10:17, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
> The e1000 driver calls memory_region_add_coalescing but
> kvm_coalesce_mmio_region never been called for those regions.
>
> Update coalesced_range on memory_region_transaction_commit to fix this.
>
> It seems very old bug since memory region API
> was merged on commit 093bc2cd885e ("Hierarchical memory region API").
>
> Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <atsushi.nemoto@sord.co.jp>
> ---
> memory.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/memory.c b/memory.c
> index d14c6dec1d..f773b0be50 100644
> --- a/memory.c
> +++ b/memory.c
> @@ -1021,6 +1021,8 @@ void memory_region_transaction_begin(void)
> ++memory_region_transaction_depth;
> }
>
> +static void memory_region_update_coalesced_range_as(MemoryRegion *mr, AddressSpace *as);
> +
> void memory_region_transaction_commit(void)
> {
> AddressSpace *as;
> @@ -1038,6 +1040,7 @@ void memory_region_transaction_commit(void)
> QTAILQ_FOREACH(as, &address_spaces, address_spaces_link) {
> address_space_set_flatview(as);
> address_space_update_ioeventfds(as);
> + memory_region_update_coalesced_range_as(NULL, as);
> }
> memory_region_update_pending = false;
> ioeventfd_update_pending = false;
> @@ -2142,7 +2145,7 @@ static void memory_region_update_coalesced_range_as(MemoryRegion *mr, AddressSpa
>
> view = address_space_get_flatview(as);
> FOR_EACH_FLAT_RANGE(fr, view) {
> - if (fr->mr == mr) {
> + if (fr->mr == mr || (!mr && !QTAILQ_EMPTY(&fr->mr->coalesced))) {
> section = (MemoryRegionSection) {
> .fv = view,
> .offset_within_address_space = int128_get64(fr->addr.start),
I'm worried that coalesced_io_del would be skipped when the region is
deleted. I think the right place to add the coalesced_io_{add,del}
calls is address_space_update_topology_pass.
Let me test an alternative fix and post it; thanks for the report in the
meanwhile!
Paolo
> @@ -2152,7 +2155,7 @@ static void memory_region_update_coalesced_range_as(MemoryRegion *mr, AddressSpa
> MEMORY_LISTENER_CALL(as, coalesced_io_del, Reverse, §ion,
> int128_get64(fr->addr.start),
> int128_get64(fr->addr.size));
> - QTAILQ_FOREACH(cmr, &mr->coalesced, link) {
> + QTAILQ_FOREACH(cmr, &fr->mr->coalesced, link) {
> tmp = addrrange_shift(cmr->addr,
> int128_sub(fr->addr.start,
> int128_make64(fr->offset_in_region)));
>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.