After iov_discard_front(), the iov may be smaller than its initial
size. Fixes the heap-buffer-overflow spotted by ASAN:
==9036==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x6060000001e0 at pc 0x7fe632eca3f0 bp 0x7ffddc4a05a0 sp 0x7ffddc49fd48
WRITE of size 32 at 0x6060000001e0 thread T0
#0 0x7fe632eca3ef (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0x773ef)
#1 0x7fe632ecad23 in __interceptor_recvmsg (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0x77d23)
#2 0x561e7491936b in vubr_backend_recv_cb /home/elmarco/src/qemu/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c:333
#3 0x561e74917711 in dispatcher_wait /home/elmarco/src/qemu/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c:160
#4 0x561e7491c3b5 in vubr_run /home/elmarco/src/qemu/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c:725
#5 0x561e7491c85c in main /home/elmarco/src/qemu/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c:806
#6 0x7fe631a6c412 in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x24412)
#7 0x561e7491667d in _start (/home/elmarco/src/qemu/build/tests/vhost-user-bridge+0x3967d)
0x6060000001e0 is located 0 bytes to the right of 64-byte region [0x6060000001a0,0x6060000001e0)
allocated by thread T0 here:
#0 0x7fe632f42848 in __interceptor_malloc (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xef848)
#1 0x561e7493acd8 in virtqueue_alloc_element /home/elmarco/src/qemu/contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c:1848
#2 0x561e7493c2a8 in vu_queue_pop /home/elmarco/src/qemu/contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c:1954
#3 0x561e749189bf in vubr_backend_recv_cb /home/elmarco/src/qemu/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c:297
#4 0x561e74917711 in dispatcher_wait /home/elmarco/src/qemu/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c:160
#5 0x561e7491c3b5 in vubr_run /home/elmarco/src/qemu/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c:725
#6 0x561e7491c85c in main /home/elmarco/src/qemu/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c:806
#7 0x7fe631a6c412 in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x24412)
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0x773ef)
Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
0x0c0c7fff7fe0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x0c0c7fff7ff0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x0c0c7fff8000: fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 05 fa fa fa fa fa
0x0c0c7fff8010: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd
0x0c0c7fff8020: fd fd fd fd fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd
=>0x0c0c7fff8030: fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00[fa]fa fa fa
0x0c0c7fff8040: fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd
0x0c0c7fff8050: fd fd fd fd fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd
0x0c0c7fff8060: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
0x0c0c7fff8070: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
0x0c0c7fff8080: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
---
tests/vhost-user-bridge.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c b/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c
index a07ce0f917..0033b61f2e 100644
--- a/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c
+++ b/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ vubr_backend_recv_cb(int sock, void *ctx)
.msg_name = (struct sockaddr *) &vubr->backend_udp_dest,
.msg_namelen = sizeof(struct sockaddr_in),
.msg_iov = sg,
- .msg_iovlen = elem->in_num,
+ .msg_iovlen = num,
.msg_flags = MSG_DONTWAIT,
};
do {
--
2.19.1.708.g4ede3d42df
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 9:39 PM Marc-André Lureau
<marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> After iov_discard_front(), the iov may be smaller than its initial
> size. Fixes the heap-buffer-overflow spotted by ASAN:
>
> ==9036==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x6060000001e0 at pc 0x7fe632eca3f0 bp 0x7ffddc4a05a0 sp 0x7ffddc49fd48
> WRITE of size 32 at 0x6060000001e0 thread T0
> #0 0x7fe632eca3ef (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0x773ef)
> #1 0x7fe632ecad23 in __interceptor_recvmsg (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0x77d23)
> #2 0x561e7491936b in vubr_backend_recv_cb /home/elmarco/src/qemu/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c:333
> #3 0x561e74917711 in dispatcher_wait /home/elmarco/src/qemu/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c:160
> #4 0x561e7491c3b5 in vubr_run /home/elmarco/src/qemu/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c:725
> #5 0x561e7491c85c in main /home/elmarco/src/qemu/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c:806
> #6 0x7fe631a6c412 in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x24412)
> #7 0x561e7491667d in _start (/home/elmarco/src/qemu/build/tests/vhost-user-bridge+0x3967d)
>
> 0x6060000001e0 is located 0 bytes to the right of 64-byte region [0x6060000001a0,0x6060000001e0)
> allocated by thread T0 here:
> #0 0x7fe632f42848 in __interceptor_malloc (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xef848)
> #1 0x561e7493acd8 in virtqueue_alloc_element /home/elmarco/src/qemu/contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c:1848
> #2 0x561e7493c2a8 in vu_queue_pop /home/elmarco/src/qemu/contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c:1954
> #3 0x561e749189bf in vubr_backend_recv_cb /home/elmarco/src/qemu/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c:297
> #4 0x561e74917711 in dispatcher_wait /home/elmarco/src/qemu/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c:160
> #5 0x561e7491c3b5 in vubr_run /home/elmarco/src/qemu/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c:725
> #6 0x561e7491c85c in main /home/elmarco/src/qemu/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c:806
> #7 0x7fe631a6c412 in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x24412)
>
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0x773ef)
> Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
> 0x0c0c7fff7fe0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 0x0c0c7fff7ff0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 0x0c0c7fff8000: fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 05 fa fa fa fa fa
> 0x0c0c7fff8010: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd
> 0x0c0c7fff8020: fd fd fd fd fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd
> =>0x0c0c7fff8030: fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00[fa]fa fa fa
> 0x0c0c7fff8040: fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd
> 0x0c0c7fff8050: fd fd fd fd fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd
> 0x0c0c7fff8060: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
> 0x0c0c7fff8070: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
> 0x0c0c7fff8080: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
ping
> ---
> tests/vhost-user-bridge.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c b/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c
> index a07ce0f917..0033b61f2e 100644
> --- a/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c
> +++ b/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c
> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ vubr_backend_recv_cb(int sock, void *ctx)
> .msg_name = (struct sockaddr *) &vubr->backend_udp_dest,
> .msg_namelen = sizeof(struct sockaddr_in),
> .msg_iov = sg,
> - .msg_iovlen = elem->in_num,
> + .msg_iovlen = num,
> .msg_flags = MSG_DONTWAIT,
> };
> do {
> --
> 2.19.1.708.g4ede3d42df
>
>
--
Marc-André Lureau
On 15/11/18 12:45, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 9:39 PM Marc-André Lureau
> <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> After iov_discard_front(), the iov may be smaller than its initial
>> size. Fixes the heap-buffer-overflow spotted by ASAN:
>>
>> ==9036==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x6060000001e0 at pc 0x7fe632eca3f0 bp 0x7ffddc4a05a0 sp 0x7ffddc49fd48
>> WRITE of size 32 at 0x6060000001e0 thread T0
>> #0 0x7fe632eca3ef (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0x773ef)
>> #1 0x7fe632ecad23 in __interceptor_recvmsg (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0x77d23)
>> #2 0x561e7491936b in vubr_backend_recv_cb /home/elmarco/src/qemu/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c:333
>> #3 0x561e74917711 in dispatcher_wait /home/elmarco/src/qemu/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c:160
>> #4 0x561e7491c3b5 in vubr_run /home/elmarco/src/qemu/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c:725
>> #5 0x561e7491c85c in main /home/elmarco/src/qemu/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c:806
>> #6 0x7fe631a6c412 in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x24412)
>> #7 0x561e7491667d in _start (/home/elmarco/src/qemu/build/tests/vhost-user-bridge+0x3967d)
>>
>> 0x6060000001e0 is located 0 bytes to the right of 64-byte region [0x6060000001a0,0x6060000001e0)
>> allocated by thread T0 here:
>> #0 0x7fe632f42848 in __interceptor_malloc (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xef848)
>> #1 0x561e7493acd8 in virtqueue_alloc_element /home/elmarco/src/qemu/contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c:1848
>> #2 0x561e7493c2a8 in vu_queue_pop /home/elmarco/src/qemu/contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c:1954
>> #3 0x561e749189bf in vubr_backend_recv_cb /home/elmarco/src/qemu/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c:297
>> #4 0x561e74917711 in dispatcher_wait /home/elmarco/src/qemu/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c:160
>> #5 0x561e7491c3b5 in vubr_run /home/elmarco/src/qemu/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c:725
>> #6 0x561e7491c85c in main /home/elmarco/src/qemu/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c:806
>> #7 0x7fe631a6c412 in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x24412)
>>
>> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0x773ef)
>> Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
>> 0x0c0c7fff7fe0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>> 0x0c0c7fff7ff0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>> 0x0c0c7fff8000: fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 05 fa fa fa fa fa
>> 0x0c0c7fff8010: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd
>> 0x0c0c7fff8020: fd fd fd fd fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd
>> =>0x0c0c7fff8030: fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00[fa]fa fa fa
>> 0x0c0c7fff8040: fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd
>> 0x0c0c7fff8050: fd fd fd fd fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd
>> 0x0c0c7fff8060: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
>> 0x0c0c7fff8070: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
>> 0x0c0c7fff8080: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
>
> ping
>
>> ---
>> tests/vhost-user-bridge.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c b/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c
>> index a07ce0f917..0033b61f2e 100644
>> --- a/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c
>> +++ b/tests/vhost-user-bridge.c
>> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ vubr_backend_recv_cb(int sock, void *ctx)
>> .msg_name = (struct sockaddr *) &vubr->backend_udp_dest,
>> .msg_namelen = sizeof(struct sockaddr_in),
>> .msg_iov = sg,
>> - .msg_iovlen = elem->in_num,
>> + .msg_iovlen = num,
>> .msg_flags = MSG_DONTWAIT,
>> };
>> do {
>> --
>> 2.19.1.708.g4ede3d42df
>>
>>
>
>
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.