On 10/13/18 11:15 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> ---
> tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py b/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py
> index ba3ac036da..3aa4dbe5f9 100644
> --- a/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py
> +++ b/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ from avocado_qemu import Test
>
> class BootLinuxConsole(Test):
> """
> - Boots a x86_64 Linux kernel and checks that the console is operational
> + Boots a Linux kernel and checks that the console is operational
> and the kernel command line is properly passed from QEMU to the kernel
>
> :avocado: enable
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ class BootLinuxConsole(Test):
>
> timeout = 60
>
> - def test(self):
> + def test_x86_64_pc(self):
> if self.arch != 'x86_64':
> self.cancel('Currently specific to the x86_64 target arch')
> kernel_url = ('https://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/28/'
>
This looks right, but given "self.arch" is still not on master, so I'm
holding on to giving the reviewed-by/tested-by.
Question: do you believe a maintainer and/or developer would want to
test specific machine types?