On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 11:20:11AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Handle id==NULL better and indicate that we are dealing with memory
> devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> ---
> hw/mem/memory-device.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/mem/memory-device.c b/hw/mem/memory-device.c
> index 7c706fadfc..0624184c40 100644
> --- a/hw/mem/memory-device.c
> +++ b/hw/mem/memory-device.c
> @@ -175,7 +175,8 @@ uint64_t memory_device_get_free_addr(MachineState *ms, const uint64_t *hint,
> if (ranges_overlap(md_addr, md_size, new_addr, size)) {
> if (hint) {
> const DeviceState *d = DEVICE(md);
> - error_setg(errp, "address range conflicts with '%s'", d->id);
> + error_setg(errp, "address range conflicts with memory device"
> + " id='%s'", d->id ? d->id : "(unnamed)");
> goto out;
> }
> new_addr = QEMU_ALIGN_UP(md_addr + md_size, align);
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson