The number of MSI interrupts a sPAPR machine can allocate is in direct
relation with the number of interrupts of the sPAPRIrq backend. Define
statically this value at the sPAPRIrq class level.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
---
include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h | 1 +
hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c | 9 +++++++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
index 0e98c4474bb2..650f810ad2aa 100644
--- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
+++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ void spapr_irq_msi_reset(sPAPRMachineState *spapr);
typedef struct sPAPRIrq {
uint32_t nr_irqs;
+ uint32_t nr_msis;
void (*init)(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, Error **errp);
int (*claim)(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int irq, bool lsi, Error **errp);
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
index 0cbb5dd39368..d369ac96f5cd 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static void spapr_irq_init_xics(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, Error **errp)
/* Initialize the MSI IRQ allocator. */
if (!SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(spapr)->legacy_irq_allocation) {
- spapr_irq_msi_init(spapr, XICS_IRQ_BASE + nr_irqs - SPAPR_IRQ_MSI);
+ spapr_irq_msi_init(spapr, smc->irq->nr_msis);
}
if (kvm_enabled()) {
@@ -195,8 +195,13 @@ static void spapr_irq_print_info_xics(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, Monitor *mon)
ics_pic_print_info(spapr->ics, mon);
}
+#define SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_IRQS XICS_IRQS_SPAPR
+#define SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_MSIS \
+ (XICS_IRQ_BASE + SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_IRQS - SPAPR_IRQ_MSI)
+
sPAPRIrq spapr_irq_xics = {
- .nr_irqs = XICS_IRQS_SPAPR,
+ .nr_irqs = SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_IRQS,
+ .nr_msis = SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_MSIS,
.init = spapr_irq_init_xics,
.claim = spapr_irq_claim_xics,
--
2.17.1
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 01:02:20PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
11;rgb:ffff/ffff/ffff> The number of MSI interrupts a sPAPR machine can allocate is in direct
> relation with the number of interrupts of the sPAPRIrq backend. Define
> statically this value at the sPAPRIrq class level.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
> ---
> include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h | 1 +
> hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c | 9 +++++++--
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> index 0e98c4474bb2..650f810ad2aa 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ void spapr_irq_msi_reset(sPAPRMachineState *spapr);
>
> typedef struct sPAPRIrq {
> uint32_t nr_irqs;
> + uint32_t nr_msis;
>
> void (*init)(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, Error **errp);
> int (*claim)(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int irq, bool lsi, Error **errp);
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> index 0cbb5dd39368..d369ac96f5cd 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static void spapr_irq_init_xics(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, Error **errp)
>
> /* Initialize the MSI IRQ allocator. */
> if (!SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(spapr)->legacy_irq_allocation) {
> - spapr_irq_msi_init(spapr, XICS_IRQ_BASE + nr_irqs - SPAPR_IRQ_MSI);
> + spapr_irq_msi_init(spapr, smc->irq->nr_msis);
> }
>
> if (kvm_enabled()) {
> @@ -195,8 +195,13 @@ static void spapr_irq_print_info_xics(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, Monitor *mon)
> ics_pic_print_info(spapr->ics, mon);
> }
>
> +#define SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_IRQS XICS_IRQS_SPAPR
> +#define SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_MSIS \
> + (XICS_IRQ_BASE + SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_IRQS - SPAPR_IRQ_MSI)
Uh.. I'm not quite understanding how XICS_IRQ_BASE gets into this.
> sPAPRIrq spapr_irq_xics = {
> - .nr_irqs = XICS_IRQS_SPAPR,
> + .nr_irqs = SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_IRQS,
> + .nr_msis = SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_MSIS,
>
> .init = spapr_irq_init_xics,
> .claim = spapr_irq_claim_xics,
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
On 09/11/2018 03:48 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 01:02:20PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> 11;rgb:ffff/ffff/ffff> The number of MSI interrupts a sPAPR machine can allocate is in direct
>> relation with the number of interrupts of the sPAPRIrq backend. Define
>> statically this value at the sPAPRIrq class level.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
>> ---
>> include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h | 1 +
>> hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c | 9 +++++++--
>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
>> index 0e98c4474bb2..650f810ad2aa 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ void spapr_irq_msi_reset(sPAPRMachineState *spapr);
>>
>> typedef struct sPAPRIrq {
>> uint32_t nr_irqs;
>> + uint32_t nr_msis;
>>
>> void (*init)(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, Error **errp);
>> int (*claim)(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int irq, bool lsi, Error **errp);
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
>> index 0cbb5dd39368..d369ac96f5cd 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
>> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static void spapr_irq_init_xics(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, Error **errp)
>>
>> /* Initialize the MSI IRQ allocator. */
>> if (!SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(spapr)->legacy_irq_allocation) {
>> - spapr_irq_msi_init(spapr, XICS_IRQ_BASE + nr_irqs - SPAPR_IRQ_MSI);
>> + spapr_irq_msi_init(spapr, smc->irq->nr_msis);
>> }
>>
>> if (kvm_enabled()) {
>> @@ -195,8 +195,13 @@ static void spapr_irq_print_info_xics(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, Monitor *mon)
>> ics_pic_print_info(spapr->ics, mon);
>> }
>>
>> +#define SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_IRQS XICS_IRQS_SPAPR
>> +#define SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_MSIS \
>> + (XICS_IRQ_BASE + SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_IRQS - SPAPR_IRQ_MSI)
>
> Uh.. I'm not quite understanding how XICS_IRQ_BASE gets into this.
because the IRQ ranges of the new static IRQ number space start at
the sPAPR IRQ number offset.
XICS_IRQ_BASE 0x1000
SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_IRQS 0x400
SPAPR_IRQ_MSI 0x1300
0x1000 + 0x400 - 0x1300 = 0x100
we could use SPAPR_IRQ_EPOW instead or some other value defining
the IRQ0 number.
>
>> sPAPRIrq spapr_irq_xics = {
>> - .nr_irqs = XICS_IRQS_SPAPR,
>> + .nr_irqs = SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_IRQS,
>> + .nr_msis = SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_MSIS,
>>
>> .init = spapr_irq_init_xics,
>> .claim = spapr_irq_claim_xics,
>
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 06:41:24AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 09/11/2018 03:48 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 01:02:20PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > 11;rgb:ffff/ffff/ffff> The number of MSI interrupts a sPAPR machine can allocate is in direct
> >> relation with the number of interrupts of the sPAPRIrq backend. Define
> >> statically this value at the sPAPRIrq class level.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
> >> ---
> >> include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h | 1 +
> >> hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c | 9 +++++++--
> >> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> >> index 0e98c4474bb2..650f810ad2aa 100644
> >> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> >> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> >> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ void spapr_irq_msi_reset(sPAPRMachineState *spapr);
> >>
> >> typedef struct sPAPRIrq {
> >> uint32_t nr_irqs;
> >> + uint32_t nr_msis;
> >>
> >> void (*init)(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, Error **errp);
> >> int (*claim)(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int irq, bool lsi, Error **errp);
> >> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> >> index 0cbb5dd39368..d369ac96f5cd 100644
> >> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> >> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> >> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static void spapr_irq_init_xics(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, Error **errp)
> >>
> >> /* Initialize the MSI IRQ allocator. */
> >> if (!SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(spapr)->legacy_irq_allocation) {
> >> - spapr_irq_msi_init(spapr, XICS_IRQ_BASE + nr_irqs - SPAPR_IRQ_MSI);
> >> + spapr_irq_msi_init(spapr, smc->irq->nr_msis);
> >> }
> >>
> >> if (kvm_enabled()) {
> >> @@ -195,8 +195,13 @@ static void spapr_irq_print_info_xics(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, Monitor *mon)
> >> ics_pic_print_info(spapr->ics, mon);
> >> }
> >>
> >> +#define SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_IRQS XICS_IRQS_SPAPR
> >> +#define SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_MSIS \
> >> + (XICS_IRQ_BASE + SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_IRQS - SPAPR_IRQ_MSI)
> >
> > Uh.. I'm not quite understanding how XICS_IRQ_BASE gets into this.
>
> because the IRQ ranges of the new static IRQ number space start at
> the sPAPR IRQ number offset.
>
> XICS_IRQ_BASE 0x1000
> SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_IRQS 0x400
>
> SPAPR_IRQ_MSI 0x1300
>
> 0x1000 + 0x400 - 0x1300 = 0x100
Duh, sorry, that's kind of obvious. Apparently my brain wasn't
working the other day.
> we could use SPAPR_IRQ_EPOW instead or some other value defining
> the IRQ0 number.
No, it's fine.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.