Commit 6692aac411199064 accidentally introduced a second initialization
of the .subsections field of vmstate_gicv3_cpu, instead of adding
the new subsection to the existing list. The effect of this was
probably that migration of GICv3 with virtualization enabled was
broken (or alternatively that migration of ICC_SRE_EL1 was broken,
depending on which of the two initializers the compiler used).
Combine the two into a single list.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
---
Not strictly a 2.12 regression.
---
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
index e58bc8b8105..e1a8999cf5b 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
@@ -134,9 +134,6 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_cpu = {
     },
     .subsections = (const VMStateDescription * []) {
         &vmstate_gicv3_cpu_virt,
-        NULL
-    },
-    .subsections = (const VMStateDescription * []) {
         &vmstate_gicv3_cpu_sre_el1,
         NULL
     }
-- 
2.17.1

Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> Commit 6692aac411199064 accidentally introduced a second initialization
> of the .subsections field of vmstate_gicv3_cpu, instead of adding
> the new subsection to the existing list. The effect of this was
> probably that migration of GICv3 with virtualization enabled was
> broken (or alternatively that migration of ICC_SRE_EL1 was broken,
> depending on which of the two initializers the compiler used).
> Combine the two into a single list.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>