[Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-3.0] accel/tcg: Don't treat invalid TLB entries as needing recheck

Peter Maydell posted 1 patch 7 years, 7 months ago
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu tags/patchew/20180629161731.16239-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Test checkpatch passed
Test docker-mingw@fedora passed
Test docker-quick@centos7 passed
Test s390x passed
accel/tcg/cputlb.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-3.0] accel/tcg: Don't treat invalid TLB entries as needing recheck
Posted by Peter Maydell 7 years, 7 months ago
In get_page_addr_code() when we check whether the TLB entry
is marked as TLB_RECHECK, we should not go down that code
path if the TLB entry is not valid at all (ie the TLB_INVALID
bit is set).

Reported-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
This fixes the abort that Laurent was seeing with his m68k test case.

 accel/tcg/cputlb.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/accel/tcg/cputlb.c b/accel/tcg/cputlb.c
index eebe97dabb7..a55296583b9 100644
--- a/accel/tcg/cputlb.c
+++ b/accel/tcg/cputlb.c
@@ -967,7 +967,8 @@ tb_page_addr_t get_page_addr_code(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong addr)
         }
     }
 
-    if (unlikely(env->tlb_table[mmu_idx][index].addr_code & TLB_RECHECK)) {
+    if (unlikely((env->tlb_table[mmu_idx][index].addr_code &
+                  (TLB_RECHECK | TLB_INVALID_MASK)) == TLB_RECHECK)) {
         /*
          * This is a TLB_RECHECK access, where the MMU protection
          * covers a smaller range than a target page, and we must
-- 
2.17.1


Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-3.0] accel/tcg: Don't treat invalid TLB entries as needing recheck
Posted by Laurent Vivier 7 years, 7 months ago
Le 29/06/2018 à 18:17, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> In get_page_addr_code() when we check whether the TLB entry
> is marked as TLB_RECHECK, we should not go down that code
> path if the TLB entry is not valid at all (ie the TLB_INVALID
> bit is set).
> 
> Reported-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
> This fixes the abort that Laurent was seeing with his m68k test case.
> 
>  accel/tcg/cputlb.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/accel/tcg/cputlb.c b/accel/tcg/cputlb.c
> index eebe97dabb7..a55296583b9 100644
> --- a/accel/tcg/cputlb.c
> +++ b/accel/tcg/cputlb.c
> @@ -967,7 +967,8 @@ tb_page_addr_t get_page_addr_code(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong addr)
>          }
>      }
>  
> -    if (unlikely(env->tlb_table[mmu_idx][index].addr_code & TLB_RECHECK)) {
> +    if (unlikely((env->tlb_table[mmu_idx][index].addr_code &
> +                  (TLB_RECHECK | TLB_INVALID_MASK)) == TLB_RECHECK)) {
>          /*
>           * This is a TLB_RECHECK access, where the MMU protection
>           * covers a smaller range than a target page, and we must
> 

Thank you!

Tested-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>


Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-3.0] accel/tcg: Don't treat invalid TLB entries as needing recheck
Posted by Richard Henderson 7 years, 7 months ago
On 06/29/2018 09:17 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> In get_page_addr_code() when we check whether the TLB entry
> is marked as TLB_RECHECK, we should not go down that code
> path if the TLB entry is not valid at all (ie the TLB_INVALID
> bit is set).
> 
> Reported-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
> This fixes the abort that Laurent was seeing with his m68k test case.


Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Also, queued to tcg-next.


r~