[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] image fleecing

Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy posted 3 patches 7 years, 7 months ago
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu tags/patchew/20180629151524.138542-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Test checkpatch passed
Test docker-mingw@fedora passed
Test docker-quick@centos7 passed
Test s390x passed
qapi/block-core.json       |   6 ++-
block/fleecing-filter.c    |  80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
blockdev.c                 |   4 +-
block/Makefile.objs        |   1 +
tests/qemu-iotests/222     | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/qemu-iotests/222.out |   5 ++
tests/qemu-iotests/group   |   1 +
7 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 block/fleecing-filter.c
create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/222
create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/222.out
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] image fleecing
Posted by Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy 7 years, 7 months ago
Image fleecing, or external (or pull) backup scheme is near to complete.
Here is forgotten test, written by Fam in far 2014, with two my necessary
patches, previously sent separately, so the series are called "v2"

v2:
 01: add transaction support
 02: rebase on master, drop "'fleecing-filter': 'BlockdevCreateNotSupported'"
     add empty .bdrv_close
     add default .bdrv_child_perm
 03: comparing to [PATCH v20 15/15] qemu-iotests: Image fleecing test case 08:
     add -f iotests.imgfmt to qemu_io
     fix target_img to be always qcow2
     add -r to qemu_io for nbd
     add fleecing-filter layer
     wrap long lines

Fam Zheng (1):
  qemu-iotests: Image fleecing test case 222

Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (2):
  blockdev-backup: enable non-root nodes for backup source
  block/fleecing-filter: new filter driver for fleecing

 qapi/block-core.json       |   6 ++-
 block/fleecing-filter.c    |  80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 blockdev.c                 |   4 +-
 block/Makefile.objs        |   1 +
 tests/qemu-iotests/222     | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tests/qemu-iotests/222.out |   5 ++
 tests/qemu-iotests/group   |   1 +
 7 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 block/fleecing-filter.c
 create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/222
 create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/222.out

-- 
2.11.1


Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] image fleecing
Posted by John Snow 7 years, 7 months ago

On 06/29/2018 11:15 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Image fleecing, or external (or pull) backup scheme is near to complete.
> Here is forgotten test, written by Fam in far 2014, with two my necessary
> patches, previously sent separately, so the series are called "v2"
> 
> v2:
>  01: add transaction support
>  02: rebase on master, drop "'fleecing-filter': 'BlockdevCreateNotSupported'"
>      add empty .bdrv_close
>      add default .bdrv_child_perm
>  03: comparing to [PATCH v20 15/15] qemu-iotests: Image fleecing test case 08:
>      add -f iotests.imgfmt to qemu_io
>      fix target_img to be always qcow2
>      add -r to qemu_io for nbd
>      add fleecing-filter layer
>      wrap long lines
> 
> Fam Zheng (1):
>   qemu-iotests: Image fleecing test case 222
> 
> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (2):
>   blockdev-backup: enable non-root nodes for backup source
>   block/fleecing-filter: new filter driver for fleecing
> 
>  qapi/block-core.json       |   6 ++-
>  block/fleecing-filter.c    |  80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  blockdev.c                 |   4 +-
>  block/Makefile.objs        |   1 +
>  tests/qemu-iotests/222     | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/qemu-iotests/222.out |   5 ++
>  tests/qemu-iotests/group   |   1 +
>  7 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 block/fleecing-filter.c
>  create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/222
>  create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/222.out
> 

Have you been able to reproduce a race that proves the filter is
necessary, or can you explain how it might happen?

I think I mentioned it once as a possibility but I hadn't convinced myself.

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] image fleecing
Posted by Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy 7 years, 7 months ago
29.06.2018 19:38, John Snow wrote:
>
> On 06/29/2018 11:15 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> Image fleecing, or external (or pull) backup scheme is near to complete.
>> Here is forgotten test, written by Fam in far 2014, with two my necessary
>> patches, previously sent separately, so the series are called "v2"
>>
>> v2:
>>   01: add transaction support
>>   02: rebase on master, drop "'fleecing-filter': 'BlockdevCreateNotSupported'"
>>       add empty .bdrv_close
>>       add default .bdrv_child_perm
>>   03: comparing to [PATCH v20 15/15] qemu-iotests: Image fleecing test case 08:
>>       add -f iotests.imgfmt to qemu_io
>>       fix target_img to be always qcow2
>>       add -r to qemu_io for nbd
>>       add fleecing-filter layer
>>       wrap long lines
>>
>> Fam Zheng (1):
>>    qemu-iotests: Image fleecing test case 222
>>
>> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (2):
>>    blockdev-backup: enable non-root nodes for backup source
>>    block/fleecing-filter: new filter driver for fleecing
>>
>>   qapi/block-core.json       |   6 ++-
>>   block/fleecing-filter.c    |  80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   blockdev.c                 |   4 +-
>>   block/Makefile.objs        |   1 +
>>   tests/qemu-iotests/222     | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   tests/qemu-iotests/222.out |   5 ++
>>   tests/qemu-iotests/group   |   1 +
>>   7 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 block/fleecing-filter.c
>>   create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/222
>>   create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/222.out
>>
> Have you been able to reproduce a race that proves the filter is
> necessary, or can you explain how it might happen?

No. But same logic is in block/replication, and I remember, that I 
discussed it on list, and the case I've described in 02 is not my idea.

>
> I think I mentioned it once as a possibility but I hadn't convinced myself.


-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir


Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] image fleecing
Posted by Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy 7 years, 7 months ago
29.06.2018 20:36, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 29.06.2018 19:38, John Snow wrote:
>>
>> On 06/29/2018 11:15 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> Image fleecing, or external (or pull) backup scheme is near to 
>>> complete.
>>> Here is forgotten test, written by Fam in far 2014, with two my 
>>> necessary
>>> patches, previously sent separately, so the series are called "v2"
>>>
>>> v2:
>>>   01: add transaction support
>>>   02: rebase on master, drop "'fleecing-filter': 
>>> 'BlockdevCreateNotSupported'"
>>>       add empty .bdrv_close
>>>       add default .bdrv_child_perm
>>>   03: comparing to [PATCH v20 15/15] qemu-iotests: Image fleecing 
>>> test case 08:
>>>       add -f iotests.imgfmt to qemu_io
>>>       fix target_img to be always qcow2
>>>       add -r to qemu_io for nbd
>>>       add fleecing-filter layer
>>>       wrap long lines
>>>
>>> Fam Zheng (1):
>>>    qemu-iotests: Image fleecing test case 222
>>>
>>> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (2):
>>>    blockdev-backup: enable non-root nodes for backup source
>>>    block/fleecing-filter: new filter driver for fleecing
>>>
>>>   qapi/block-core.json       |   6 ++-
>>>   block/fleecing-filter.c    |  80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   blockdev.c                 |   4 +-
>>>   block/Makefile.objs        |   1 +
>>>   tests/qemu-iotests/222     | 112 
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   tests/qemu-iotests/222.out |   5 ++
>>>   tests/qemu-iotests/group   |   1 +
>>>   7 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>   create mode 100644 block/fleecing-filter.c
>>>   create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/222
>>>   create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/222.out
>>>
>> Have you been able to reproduce a race that proves the filter is
>> necessary, or can you explain how it might happen?
>
> No. But same logic is in block/replication, and I remember, that I 
> discussed it on list, and the case I've described in 02 is not my idea.

found: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-08/msg01807.html

>
>>
>> I think I mentioned it once as a possibility but I hadn't convinced 
>> myself.
>
>


-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir