On 06/26/2018 08:50 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
> block/qcow2.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/qcow2.c b/block/qcow2.c
> index 945132f692..46194a33ca 100644
> --- a/block/qcow2.c
> +++ b/block/qcow2.c
> @@ -2114,9 +2114,9 @@ static int qcow2_inactivate(BlockDriverState *bs)
> qcow2_store_persistent_dirty_bitmaps(bs, &local_err);
> if (local_err != NULL) {
> result = -EINVAL;
> - error_report_err(local_err);
> - error_report("Persistent bitmaps are lost for node '%s'",
> - bdrv_get_device_or_node_name(bs));
> + error_reportf_err(local_err, "Persistent bitmaps are lost for node "
> + "'%s', because failed to store them on qcow2 "
> + "inactivation: ", bdrv_get_device_or_node_name(bs));
That's longer, and has awkward grammar.
Also, for a patch designed to improve an error message, it's nice if the
commit message demonstrates a before-and-after comparison of the two
different wordings, along with a formula for reproducing the error (not
mandatory, but it can sure help in reviewing).
Shorter might be:
"Lost persistent bitmaps during inactivation of node '%s': "
since the local_err text appended after the colon will then make it
obvious what the error was during inactivation.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org