* guangrong.xiao@gmail.com (guangrong.xiao@gmail.com) wrote:
> From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@tencent.com>
>
> Sync up xbzrle_cache_miss_prev only after migration iteration goes
> forward
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@tencent.com>
Yeh, I think you're right.
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> ---
> migration/ram.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> index dbf24d8c87..dd1283dd45 100644
> --- a/migration/ram.c
> +++ b/migration/ram.c
> @@ -1189,9 +1189,9 @@ static void migration_bitmap_sync(RAMState *rs)
> (double)(xbzrle_counters.cache_miss -
> rs->xbzrle_cache_miss_prev) /
> (rs->iterations - rs->iterations_prev);
> + rs->xbzrle_cache_miss_prev = xbzrle_counters.cache_miss;
> }
> rs->iterations_prev = rs->iterations;
> - rs->xbzrle_cache_miss_prev = xbzrle_counters.cache_miss;
> }
>
> /* reset period counters */
> --
> 2.14.4
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK