On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:02:15 +0100
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 02/23/2018 10:54 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > It's already defined in cpu.h (to the same value) and not used in
> > the sclp code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > include/hw/s390x/sclp.h | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> > index 476cbf78f2..f9db243484 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> > @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@
> > #define SCLP_FC_ASSIGN_ATTACH_READ_STOR 0xE00000000000ULL
> > #define SCLP_STARTING_SUBINCREMENT_ID 0x10001
> > #define SCLP_INCREMENT_UNIT 0x10000
> > -#define MAX_AVAIL_SLOTS 32
> > #define MAX_STORAGE_INCREMENTS 1020
> >
> > /* CPU hotplug SCLP codes */
> >
> Do we need this define and s390_get_memslot_count at all after removing
> the hotplug code?
>
Indeed. Let's kill it with fire :)