On 02/09/2018 01:37 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 19:00:16 +0100
> <antonios.motakis@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Antonios Motakis <antonios.motakis@huawei.com>
>>
>> There is no need for signedness on these QID fields for 9p.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Antonios Motakis <antonios.motakis@huawei.com>
>> ---
> I agree these should be unsigned, but you have some more places to adapt
> to this change. At least these:
> - related traces in hw/9pfs/trace-events should then expect unsigned values
> - donttouch_stat() in hw/9pfs/9p.c should stop comparing them to -1
Noted!
>
>> fsdev/9p-marshal.h | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fsdev/9p-marshal.h b/fsdev/9p-marshal.h
>> index c8823d8..d1ad364 100644
>> --- a/fsdev/9p-marshal.h
>> +++ b/fsdev/9p-marshal.h
>> @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ typedef struct V9fsString
>> typedef struct V9fsQID
>> {
>> int8_t type;
> Even if your series doesn't use it, while here, let's drop the sign from
> @type as well.
Agreed
>
>> - int32_t version;
>> - int64_t path;
>> + uint32_t version;
>> + uint64_t path;
>> } V9fsQID;
>>
>> typedef struct V9fsStat