If the bdrv_reopen_prepare helper isn't provided, the qemu-img commit
command fails to re-open the base layer after committing changes into
it. Provide a no-op implementation for the LUKS driver, since there
is not any custom work that needs doing to re-open it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
---
block/crypto.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block/crypto.c b/block/crypto.c
index 60ddf8623e..bb9a8f5376 100644
--- a/block/crypto.c
+++ b/block/crypto.c
@@ -382,6 +382,12 @@ static void block_crypto_close(BlockDriverState *bs)
qcrypto_block_free(crypto->block);
}
+static int block_crypto_reopen_prepare(BDRVReopenState *state,
+ BlockReopenQueue *queue, Error **errp)
+{
+ /* nothing needs checking */
+ return 0;
+}
/*
* 1 MB bounce buffer gives good performance / memory tradeoff
@@ -620,6 +626,7 @@ BlockDriver bdrv_crypto_luks = {
.bdrv_truncate = block_crypto_truncate,
.create_opts = &block_crypto_create_opts_luks,
+ .bdrv_reopen_prepare = block_crypto_reopen_prepare,
.bdrv_refresh_limits = block_crypto_refresh_limits,
.bdrv_co_preadv = block_crypto_co_preadv,
.bdrv_co_pwritev = block_crypto_co_pwritev,
--
2.14.3
On 01/18/2018 04:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> If the bdrv_reopen_prepare helper isn't provided, the qemu-img commit
> command fails to re-open the base layer after committing changes into
> it. Provide a no-op implementation for the LUKS driver, since there
> is not any custom work that needs doing to re-open it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/crypto.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
I'm hoping another block-layer expert chimes in, as I'm not quite sure
what the full reopen rules are; but the idea makes sense to me.
>
> diff --git a/block/crypto.c b/block/crypto.c
> index 60ddf8623e..bb9a8f5376 100644
> --- a/block/crypto.c
> +++ b/block/crypto.c
> @@ -382,6 +382,12 @@ static void block_crypto_close(BlockDriverState *bs)
> qcrypto_block_free(crypto->block);
> }
>
> +static int block_crypto_reopen_prepare(BDRVReopenState *state,
> + BlockReopenQueue *queue, Error **errp)
> +{
> + /* nothing needs checking */
Are we sure that even changes such as moving from read-only to
read-write need no checking?
> + return 0;
> +}
>
> /*
> * 1 MB bounce buffer gives good performance / memory tradeoff
> @@ -620,6 +626,7 @@ BlockDriver bdrv_crypto_luks = {
> .bdrv_truncate = block_crypto_truncate,
> .create_opts = &block_crypto_create_opts_luks,
>
> + .bdrv_reopen_prepare = block_crypto_reopen_prepare,
> .bdrv_refresh_limits = block_crypto_refresh_limits,
> .bdrv_co_preadv = block_crypto_co_preadv,
> .bdrv_co_pwritev = block_crypto_co_pwritev,
>
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 01:51:36PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/18/2018 04:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > If the bdrv_reopen_prepare helper isn't provided, the qemu-img commit
> > command fails to re-open the base layer after committing changes into
> > it. Provide a no-op implementation for the LUKS driver, since there
> > is not any custom work that needs doing to re-open it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > block/crypto.c | 7 +++++++
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> I'm hoping another block-layer expert chimes in, as I'm not quite sure
> what the full reopen rules are; but the idea makes sense to me.
Yeah, likewise - it is hard to understand what is required, but I see
lots of other block drivers just put a no-op impl here. I'm relying on
Kevin/Max to tell me if i'm wrong here
> > diff --git a/block/crypto.c b/block/crypto.c
> > index 60ddf8623e..bb9a8f5376 100644
> > --- a/block/crypto.c
> > +++ b/block/crypto.c
> > @@ -382,6 +382,12 @@ static void block_crypto_close(BlockDriverState *bs)
> > qcrypto_block_free(crypto->block);
> > }
> >
> > +static int block_crypto_reopen_prepare(BDRVReopenState *state,
> > + BlockReopenQueue *queue, Error **errp)
> > +{
> > + /* nothing needs checking */
>
> Are we sure that even changes such as moving from read-only to
> read-write need no checking?
LUKS doesn't do anything differently with ro vs rw images, so I'm assuming
any such checks are handled by the layer below.
>
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> >
> > /*
> > * 1 MB bounce buffer gives good performance / memory tradeoff
> > @@ -620,6 +626,7 @@ BlockDriver bdrv_crypto_luks = {
> > .bdrv_truncate = block_crypto_truncate,
> > .create_opts = &block_crypto_create_opts_luks,
> >
> > + .bdrv_reopen_prepare = block_crypto_reopen_prepare,
> > .bdrv_refresh_limits = block_crypto_refresh_limits,
> > .bdrv_co_preadv = block_crypto_co_preadv,
> > .bdrv_co_pwritev = block_crypto_co_pwritev,
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
On 2018-01-18 11:31, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> If the bdrv_reopen_prepare helper isn't provided, the qemu-img commit
> command fails to re-open the base layer after committing changes into
> it. Provide a no-op implementation for the LUKS driver, since there
> is not any custom work that needs doing to re-open it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/crypto.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/crypto.c b/block/crypto.c
> index 60ddf8623e..bb9a8f5376 100644
> --- a/block/crypto.c
> +++ b/block/crypto.c
> @@ -382,6 +382,12 @@ static void block_crypto_close(BlockDriverState *bs)
> qcrypto_block_free(crypto->block);
> }
>
> +static int block_crypto_reopen_prepare(BDRVReopenState *state,
> + BlockReopenQueue *queue, Error **errp)
> +{
> + /* nothing needs checking */
> + return 0;
> +}
Unfortunately I have to admit I'm not quite an expert on reopen
myself... But generally it is used to change options, so in theory one
could provide a new key-secret here. It's up to you whether you want to
support that or not (with this implementation the user will get an error
when they want to change the key-secret).
Apart from that, I think a no-op should be OK.
Max
>
> /*
> * 1 MB bounce buffer gives good performance / memory tradeoff
> @@ -620,6 +626,7 @@ BlockDriver bdrv_crypto_luks = {
> .bdrv_truncate = block_crypto_truncate,
> .create_opts = &block_crypto_create_opts_luks,
>
> + .bdrv_reopen_prepare = block_crypto_reopen_prepare,
> .bdrv_refresh_limits = block_crypto_refresh_limits,
> .bdrv_co_preadv = block_crypto_co_preadv,
> .bdrv_co_pwritev = block_crypto_co_pwritev,
>
Ping, can this be queued in the block tree, since it appears the no-op impl
is ok ?
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:31:43AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> If the bdrv_reopen_prepare helper isn't provided, the qemu-img commit
> command fails to re-open the base layer after committing changes into
> it. Provide a no-op implementation for the LUKS driver, since there
> is not any custom work that needs doing to re-open it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/crypto.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/crypto.c b/block/crypto.c
> index 60ddf8623e..bb9a8f5376 100644
> --- a/block/crypto.c
> +++ b/block/crypto.c
> @@ -382,6 +382,12 @@ static void block_crypto_close(BlockDriverState *bs)
> qcrypto_block_free(crypto->block);
> }
>
> +static int block_crypto_reopen_prepare(BDRVReopenState *state,
> + BlockReopenQueue *queue, Error **errp)
> +{
> + /* nothing needs checking */
> + return 0;
> +}
>
> /*
> * 1 MB bounce buffer gives good performance / memory tradeoff
> @@ -620,6 +626,7 @@ BlockDriver bdrv_crypto_luks = {
> .bdrv_truncate = block_crypto_truncate,
> .create_opts = &block_crypto_create_opts_luks,
>
> + .bdrv_reopen_prepare = block_crypto_reopen_prepare,
> .bdrv_refresh_limits = block_crypto_refresh_limits,
> .bdrv_co_preadv = block_crypto_co_preadv,
> .bdrv_co_pwritev = block_crypto_co_pwritev,
> --
> 2.14.3
>
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
Ping
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 01:53:12PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Ping, can this be queued in the block tree, since it appears the no-op impl
> is ok ?
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:31:43AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > If the bdrv_reopen_prepare helper isn't provided, the qemu-img commit
> > command fails to re-open the base layer after committing changes into
> > it. Provide a no-op implementation for the LUKS driver, since there
> > is not any custom work that needs doing to re-open it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > block/crypto.c | 7 +++++++
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/crypto.c b/block/crypto.c
> > index 60ddf8623e..bb9a8f5376 100644
> > --- a/block/crypto.c
> > +++ b/block/crypto.c
> > @@ -382,6 +382,12 @@ static void block_crypto_close(BlockDriverState *bs)
> > qcrypto_block_free(crypto->block);
> > }
> >
> > +static int block_crypto_reopen_prepare(BDRVReopenState *state,
> > + BlockReopenQueue *queue, Error **errp)
> > +{
> > + /* nothing needs checking */
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> >
> > /*
> > * 1 MB bounce buffer gives good performance / memory tradeoff
> > @@ -620,6 +626,7 @@ BlockDriver bdrv_crypto_luks = {
> > .bdrv_truncate = block_crypto_truncate,
> > .create_opts = &block_crypto_create_opts_luks,
> >
> > + .bdrv_reopen_prepare = block_crypto_reopen_prepare,
> > .bdrv_refresh_limits = block_crypto_refresh_limits,
> > .bdrv_co_preadv = block_crypto_co_preadv,
> > .bdrv_co_pwritev = block_crypto_co_pwritev,
> > --
> > 2.14.3
> >
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
> --
> |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
> |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
> |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
>
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
Am 18.01.2018 um 11:31 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben: > If the bdrv_reopen_prepare helper isn't provided, the qemu-img commit > command fails to re-open the base layer after committing changes into > it. Provide a no-op implementation for the LUKS driver, since there > is not any custom work that needs doing to re-open it. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> Thanks, applied to the block branch. Kevin
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.