On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
> This makes the code slightly safer, also easier to review.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
I just looked at the surrounding code and realised what mask actually
is set to. Now I understand what you mean.
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xilinx.com>
Alistair
> ---
> hw/sd/sdhci.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/sd/sdhci.c b/hw/sd/sdhci.c
> index b7d2a20985..3c78033d49 100644
> --- a/hw/sd/sdhci.c
> +++ b/hw/sd/sdhci.c
> @@ -1132,12 +1132,10 @@ sdhci_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, uint64_t val, unsigned size)
> MASKED_WRITE(s->admaerr, mask, value);
> break;
> case SDHC_ADMASYSADDR:
> - s->admasysaddr = (s->admasysaddr & (0xFFFFFFFF00000000ULL |
> - (uint64_t)mask)) | (uint64_t)value;
> + s->admasysaddr = deposit64(s->admasysaddr, 0, 32, value);
> break;
> case SDHC_ADMASYSADDR + 4:
> - s->admasysaddr = (s->admasysaddr & (0x00000000FFFFFFFFULL |
> - ((uint64_t)mask << 32))) | ((uint64_t)value << 32);
> + s->admasysaddr = deposit64(s->admasysaddr, 32, 32, value);
> break;
> case SDHC_FEAER:
> s->acmd12errsts |= value;
> --
> 2.15.1
>
>