[Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH for-2.12 0/2] ACPI/unit-test: Add a testcase

Dou Liyang posted 2 patches 48 weeks ago
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu tags/patchew/20171214040855.22231-1-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Test checkpatch passed
Test docker passed
Test ppc passed
Test s390x passed
tests/bios-tables-test.c              |  24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/pc/DSDT.numamem
create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/pc/SRAT.numamem
create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/q35/DSDT.numamem
create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/q35/SRAT.numamem

[Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH for-2.12 0/2] ACPI/unit-test: Add a testcase

Posted by Dou Liyang 48 weeks ago
These are the patches left over from the pull request:

  [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/9] x86 and machine queue, 2017-10-05

because of some errors when tested by "make check" command[1].

Now, the QEMU 2.11.0 has been released, rebase/retest/respin them
for v2.12 dev.

Changelog:
  --Rebase and retest this patch in v2.11.0
  --Update the DSDT.numamem:

[1]: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-10/msg01334.html

Dou Liyang (2):
  ACPI/unit-test: Add a testcase for RAM allocation in numa node
  hw/acpi-build: Make next_base easy to follow

 hw/i386/acpi-build.c                  |   2 +-
 tests/acpi-test-data/pc/DSDT.numamem  | Bin 0 -> 5150 bytes
 tests/acpi-test-data/pc/SRAT.numamem  | Bin 0 -> 224 bytes
 tests/acpi-test-data/q35/DSDT.numamem | Bin 0 -> 7834 bytes
 tests/acpi-test-data/q35/SRAT.numamem | Bin 0 -> 224 bytes
 tests/bios-tables-test.c              |  24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/pc/DSDT.numamem
 create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/pc/SRAT.numamem
 create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/q35/DSDT.numamem
 create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/q35/SRAT.numamem

-- 
2.14.3




Re: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH for-2.12 0/2] ACPI/unit-test: Add a testcase

Posted by Eduardo Habkost 47 weeks ago
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:08:53PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
> These are the patches left over from the pull request:
> 
>   [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/9] x86 and machine queue, 2017-10-05
> 
> because of some errors when tested by "make check" command[1].
> 
> Now, the QEMU 2.11.0 has been released, rebase/retest/respin them
> for v2.12 dev.
> 
> Changelog:
>   --Rebase and retest this patch in v2.11.0
>   --Update the DSDT.numamem:
> 
> [1]: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-10/msg01334.html

Do we know what caused the failures Peter saw, and if we can now
be sure it won't happen again?

-- 
Eduardo

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH for-2.12 0/2] ACPI/unit-test: Add a testcase

Posted by Dou Liyang 47 weeks ago
Hi Eduardo,

At 12/19/2017 06:09 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:08:53PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
>> These are the patches left over from the pull request:
>>
>>    [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/9] x86 and machine queue, 2017-10-05
>>
>> because of some errors when tested by "make check" command[1].
>>
>> Now, the QEMU 2.11.0 has been released, rebase/retest/respin them
>> for v2.12 dev.
>>
>> Changelog:
>>    --Rebase and retest this patch in v2.11.0
>>    --Update the DSDT.numamem:
>>
>> [1]: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-10/msg01334.html
> 
> Do we know what caused the failures Peter saw, and if we can now
> be sure it won't happen again?

Sorry, I can't. I tested it many times with my colleagues, it won't
happen like Peter saw. This issue is very subtle and funny. Could you
give me some suggestions?

BTW, I used "make TEST_ACPI_REBUILD_AML=1 check" to create the DSDT
file. Is it correct?

Thanks,
	dou.
>



Re: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH for-2.12 0/2] ACPI/unit-test: Add a testcase

Posted by Eduardo Habkost 47 weeks ago
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:01:59PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
> Hi Eduardo,
> 
> At 12/19/2017 06:09 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:08:53PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > > These are the patches left over from the pull request:
> > > 
> > >    [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/9] x86 and machine queue, 2017-10-05
> > > 
> > > because of some errors when tested by "make check" command[1].
> > > 
> > > Now, the QEMU 2.11.0 has been released, rebase/retest/respin them
> > > for v2.12 dev.
> > > 
> > > Changelog:
> > >    --Rebase and retest this patch in v2.11.0
> > >    --Update the DSDT.numamem:
> > > 
> > > [1]: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-10/msg01334.html
> > 
> > Do we know what caused the failures Peter saw, and if we can now
> > be sure it won't happen again?
> 
> Sorry, I can't. I tested it many times with my colleagues, it won't
> happen like Peter saw. This issue is very subtle and funny. Could you
> give me some suggestions?

I guess all we can do is to ask Peter to test if the issue is
still reproducible.

Peter, do you prefer that I just send a regular pull request
asking for testing, or do you prefer to apply this series and
test it manually before I send a pull request?

> 
> BTW, I used "make TEST_ACPI_REBUILD_AML=1 check" to create the DSDT
> file. Is it correct?

This sounds correct to me.  Igor, can you confirm?

-- 
Eduardo

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH for-2.12 0/2] ACPI/unit-test: Add a testcase

Posted by Igor Mammedov 47 weeks ago
On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 19:38:20 -0200
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:01:59PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > Hi Eduardo,
> > 
> > At 12/19/2017 06:09 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:08:53PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > > > These are the patches left over from the pull request:
> > > > 
> > > >    [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/9] x86 and machine queue, 2017-10-05
> > > > 
> > > > because of some errors when tested by "make check" command[1].
> > > > 
> > > > Now, the QEMU 2.11.0 has been released, rebase/retest/respin them
> > > > for v2.12 dev.
> > > > 
> > > > Changelog:
> > > >    --Rebase and retest this patch in v2.11.0
> > > >    --Update the DSDT.numamem:
> > > > 
> > > > [1]: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-10/msg01334.html
> > > 
> > > Do we know what caused the failures Peter saw, and if we can now
> > > be sure it won't happen again?
> > 
> > Sorry, I can't. I tested it many times with my colleagues, it won't
> > happen like Peter saw. This issue is very subtle and funny. Could you
> > give me some suggestions?
> 
> I guess all we can do is to ask Peter to test if the issue is
> still reproducible.
> 
> Peter, do you prefer that I just send a regular pull request
> asking for testing, or do you prefer to apply this series and
> test it manually before I send a pull request?
> 
> > 
> > BTW, I used "make TEST_ACPI_REBUILD_AML=1 check" to create the DSDT
> > file. Is it correct?
> 
> This sounds correct to me.  Igor, can you confirm?
It's will rebuild/update reference tables.

I'm for merging it early and tracking/fixing issue Peter saw during this dev cycle.




Re: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH for-2.12 0/2] ACPI/unit-test: Add a testcase

Posted by Michael S. Tsirkin 47 weeks ago
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 08:24:34PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 19:38:20 -0200
> Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:01:59PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > > Hi Eduardo,
> > > 
> > > At 12/19/2017 06:09 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:08:53PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > > > > These are the patches left over from the pull request:
> > > > > 
> > > > >    [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/9] x86 and machine queue, 2017-10-05
> > > > > 
> > > > > because of some errors when tested by "make check" command[1].
> > > > > 
> > > > > Now, the QEMU 2.11.0 has been released, rebase/retest/respin them
> > > > > for v2.12 dev.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Changelog:
> > > > >    --Rebase and retest this patch in v2.11.0
> > > > >    --Update the DSDT.numamem:
> > > > > 
> > > > > [1]: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-10/msg01334.html
> > > > 
> > > > Do we know what caused the failures Peter saw, and if we can now
> > > > be sure it won't happen again?
> > > 
> > > Sorry, I can't. I tested it many times with my colleagues, it won't
> > > happen like Peter saw. This issue is very subtle and funny. Could you
> > > give me some suggestions?
> > 
> > I guess all we can do is to ask Peter to test if the issue is
> > still reproducible.
> > 
> > Peter, do you prefer that I just send a regular pull request
> > asking for testing, or do you prefer to apply this series and
> > test it manually before I send a pull request?
> > 
> > > 
> > > BTW, I used "make TEST_ACPI_REBUILD_AML=1 check" to create the DSDT
> > > file. Is it correct?
> > 
> > This sounds correct to me.  Igor, can you confirm?
> It's will rebuild/update reference tables.
> 
> I'm for merging it early and tracking/fixing issue Peter saw during this dev cycle.
> 
> 

Send an ack then?

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH for-2.12 0/2] ACPI/unit-test: Add a testcase

Posted by Dou Liyang 44 weeks ago
[...]
>>>>
>>>> BTW, I used "make TEST_ACPI_REBUILD_AML=1 check" to create the DSDT
>>>> file. Is it correct?
>>>
>>> This sounds correct to me.  Igor, can you confirm?
>> It's will rebuild/update reference tables.
>>
>> I'm for merging it early and tracking/fixing issue Peter saw during this dev cycle.
>>
>>
> 
> Send an ack then?
> 
Hi Michael,

I saw Igor gave the Reviewed-by at 21 Dec 2017.

What is the state of this patchset?

I rebase and retest it again, Do I need to send it again?

Thanks,
	dou
> 
> 



Re: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH for-2.12 0/2] ACPI/unit-test: Add a testcase

Posted by Dou Liyang 44 weeks ago

At 01/12/2018 03:23 PM, Dou Liyang wrote:
> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW, I used "make TEST_ACPI_REBUILD_AML=1 check" to create the DSDT
>>>>> file. Is it correct?
>>>>
>>>> This sounds correct to me.  Igor, can you confirm?
>>> It's will rebuild/update reference tables.
>>>
>>> I'm for merging it early and tracking/fixing issue Peter saw during 
>>> this dev cycle.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Send an ack then?
>>
> Hi Michael,
> 
> I saw Igor gave the Reviewed-by at 21 Dec 2017
                                      ^^ Oops! Sorry, it's 27 Dec.
> 
> What is the state of this patchset?
> 
> I rebase and retest it again, Do I need to send it again?
> 
> Thanks,
>      dou
>>
>>