Normally we create an address space for that CPU and pass that address
space into the function. Let's just do it inside to unify address space
creations. It'll simplify my next patch to rename those address spaces.
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
cpus.c | 5 +----
exec.c | 7 ++++++-
include/exec/exec-all.h | 6 ++++--
target/arm/cpu.c | 13 +++----------
target/i386/cpu.c | 10 ++--------
5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c
index 114c29b6a0..ae9dbf9510 100644
--- a/cpus.c
+++ b/cpus.c
@@ -1778,11 +1778,8 @@ void qemu_init_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
/* If the target cpu hasn't set up any address spaces itself,
* give it the default one.
*/
- AddressSpace *as = g_new0(AddressSpace, 1);
-
- address_space_init(as, cpu->memory, "cpu-memory");
cpu->num_ases = 1;
- cpu_address_space_init(cpu, as, 0);
+ cpu_address_space_init(cpu, 0, "cpu-memory", cpu->memory);
}
if (kvm_enabled()) {
diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
index 8b579c0cd9..b4abe75931 100644
--- a/exec.c
+++ b/exec.c
@@ -714,9 +714,14 @@ CPUState *qemu_get_cpu(int index)
}
#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
-void cpu_address_space_init(CPUState *cpu, AddressSpace *as, int asidx)
+void cpu_address_space_init(CPUState *cpu, int asidx,
+ const char *prefix, MemoryRegion *mr)
{
CPUAddressSpace *newas;
+ AddressSpace *as = g_new0(AddressSpace, 1);
+
+ assert(mr);
+ address_space_init(as, mr, prefix);
/* Target code should have set num_ases before calling us */
assert(asidx < cpu->num_ases);
diff --git a/include/exec/exec-all.h b/include/exec/exec-all.h
index 0f51c92adb..b37f7d8d92 100644
--- a/include/exec/exec-all.h
+++ b/include/exec/exec-all.h
@@ -74,8 +74,9 @@ void cpu_reloading_memory_map(void);
/**
* cpu_address_space_init:
* @cpu: CPU to add this address space to
- * @as: address space to add
* @asidx: integer index of this address space
+ * @prefix: prefix to be used as name of address space
+ * @mr: the root memory region of address space
*
* Add the specified address space to the CPU's cpu_ases list.
* The address space added with @asidx 0 is the one used for the
@@ -89,7 +90,8 @@ void cpu_reloading_memory_map(void);
*
* Note that with KVM only one address space is supported.
*/
-void cpu_address_space_init(CPUState *cpu, AddressSpace *as, int asidx);
+void cpu_address_space_init(CPUState *cpu, int asidx,
+ const char *prefix, MemoryRegion *mr);
#endif
#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY) && defined(CONFIG_TCG)
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
index 7f7a3d1e32..cc1856c32b 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
@@ -705,9 +705,6 @@ static void arm_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
int pagebits;
Error *local_err = NULL;
-#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
- AddressSpace *as;
-#endif
cpu_exec_realizefn(cs, &local_err);
if (local_err != NULL) {
@@ -912,21 +909,17 @@ static void arm_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
if (cpu->has_el3 || arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_M_SECURITY)) {
- as = g_new0(AddressSpace, 1);
-
cs->num_ases = 2;
if (!cpu->secure_memory) {
cpu->secure_memory = cs->memory;
}
- address_space_init(as, cpu->secure_memory, "cpu-secure-memory");
- cpu_address_space_init(cs, as, ARMASIdx_S);
+ cpu_address_space_init(cs, ARMASIdx_S, "cpu-secure-memory",
+ cpu->secure_memory);
} else {
cs->num_ases = 1;
}
- as = g_new0(AddressSpace, 1);
- address_space_init(as, cs->memory, "cpu-memory");
- cpu_address_space_init(cs, as, ARMASIdx_NS);
+ cpu_address_space_init(cs, ARMASIdx_NS, "cpu-memory", cs->memory);
#endif
qemu_init_vcpu(cs);
diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
index 1edcf29e27..7dd408cba8 100644
--- a/target/i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
@@ -3736,11 +3736,6 @@ static void x86_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
if (tcg_enabled()) {
- AddressSpace *as_normal = g_new0(AddressSpace, 1);
- AddressSpace *as_smm = g_new(AddressSpace, 1);
-
- address_space_init(as_normal, cs->memory, "cpu-memory");
-
cpu->cpu_as_mem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
cpu->cpu_as_root = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
@@ -3755,11 +3750,10 @@ static void x86_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
get_system_memory(), 0, ~0ull);
memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(cpu->cpu_as_root, 0, cpu->cpu_as_mem, 0);
memory_region_set_enabled(cpu->cpu_as_mem, true);
- address_space_init(as_smm, cpu->cpu_as_root, "CPU");
cs->num_ases = 2;
- cpu_address_space_init(cs, as_normal, 0);
- cpu_address_space_init(cs, as_smm, 1);
+ cpu_address_space_init(cs, 0, "cpu-memory", cs->memory);
+ cpu_address_space_init(cs, 1, "cpu-smm", cpu->cpu_as_root);
/* ... SMRAM with higher priority, linked from /machine/smram. */
cpu->machine_done.notify = x86_cpu_machine_done;
--
2.14.3
On 23/11/2017 10:23, Peter Xu wrote:
> + const char *prefix, MemoryRegion *mr)
> {
> CPUAddressSpace *newas;
> + AddressSpace *as = g_new0(AddressSpace, 1);
> +
> + assert(mr);
> + address_space_init(as, mr, prefix);
>
Now that address_space_init_shareable doesn't exist anymore, the
AddressSpace could be placed directly in CPUAddressSpace instead of
having a pointer. But the patches are already okay, that's a separate
change.
Paolo
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 05:06:31PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 23/11/2017 10:23, Peter Xu wrote:
> > + const char *prefix, MemoryRegion *mr)
> > {
> > CPUAddressSpace *newas;
> > + AddressSpace *as = g_new0(AddressSpace, 1);
> > +
> > + assert(mr);
> > + address_space_init(as, mr, prefix);
> >
>
> Now that address_space_init_shareable doesn't exist anymore, the
> AddressSpace could be placed directly in CPUAddressSpace instead of
> having a pointer. But the patches are already okay, that's a separate
> change.
Yes. Let me append another patch and repost. Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.