Series comparison

-[Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/1] Block patches
+[PULL for-6.1 0/3] Block patches
-The following changes since commit b33afc415622e5eb26e0f14fd27eb86e32a5472e:
+The following changes since commit 3521ade3510eb5cefb2e27a101667f25dad89935:
-  Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/stsquad/tags/pull-ci-updates-for-softfreeze-021117-2' into staging (2017-11-03 10:08:34 +0000)
+  Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/thuth-gitlab/tags/pull-request-2021-07-29' into staging (2021-07-29 13:17:20 +0100)
-are available in the git repository at:
+are available in the Git repository at:
-  git://github.com/stefanha/qemu.git tags/block-pull-request
+  https://gitlab.com/stefanha/qemu.git tags/block-pull-request
-for you to fetch changes up to ef9115dd7c82a196b18cac46784724bdebf01fbc:
+for you to fetch changes up to cc8eecd7f105a1dff5876adeb238a14696061a4a:
-  aio-posix: drop QEMU_AIO_POLL_MAX_NS env var (2017-11-06 11:04:38 +0000)
+  MAINTAINERS: Added myself as a reviewer for the NVMe Block Driver (2021-07-29 17:17:34 +0100)
 ----------------------------------------------------------------
 Pull request
 The main fix here is for io_uring. Spurious -EAGAIN errors can happen and the
 request needs to be resubmitted.
 The MAINTAINERS changes carry no risk and we might as well include them in QEMU
 .1.
 ----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
+Fabian Ebner (1):
   block/io_uring: resubmit when result is -EAGAIN
-Stefan Hajnoczi (1):
+Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (1):
-  aio-posix: drop QEMU_AIO_POLL_MAX_NS env var
+  MAINTAINERS: Added myself as a reviewer for the NVMe Block Driver
- util/aio-posix.c | 7 -------
+Stefano Garzarella (1):
-file changed, 7 deletions(-)
+  MAINTAINERS: add Stefano Garzarella as io_uring reviewer
  MAINTAINERS      |  2 ++
  block/io_uring.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 --
-.13.6
+.31.1

-New patch
+[PULL for-6.1 1/3] MAINTAINERS: add Stefano Garzarella as io_uring reviewer
+From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
+I've been working with io_uring for a while so I'd like to help
+with reviews.
+Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
+Message-Id: <20210728131515.131045-1-sgarzare@redhat.com>
+Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
+---
+ MAINTAINERS | 1 +
+file changed, 1 insertion(+)
+diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
+index XXXXXXX..XXXXXXX 100644
+--- a/MAINTAINERS
++++ b/MAINTAINERS
+@@ -XXX,XX +XXX,XX @@ Linux io_uring
+ M: Aarushi Mehta <mehta.aaru20@gmail.com>
+ M: Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com>
+ M: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
++R: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
+ L: qemu-block@nongnu.org
+ S: Maintained
+ F: block/io_uring.c
+--
+.31.1

-New patch
+[PULL for-6.1 2/3] block/io_uring: resubmit when result is -EAGAIN
+From: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
+Linux SCSI can throw spurious -EAGAIN in some corner cases in its
+completion path, which will end up being the result in the completed
+io_uring request.
+Resubmitting such requests should allow block jobs to complete, even
+if such spurious errors are encountered.
+Co-authored-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
+Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
+Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
+Message-id: 20210729091029.65369-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com
+Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
+---
+ block/io_uring.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
+file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+diff --git a/block/io_uring.c b/block/io_uring.c
+index XXXXXXX..XXXXXXX 100644
+--- a/block/io_uring.c
++++ b/block/io_uring.c
+@@ -XXX,XX +XXX,XX @@ static void luring_process_completions(LuringState *s)
+         total_bytes = ret + luringcb->total_read;
+         if (ret < 0) {
+-            if (ret == -EINTR) {
++            /*
++             * Only writev/readv/fsync requests on regular files or host block
++             * devices are submitted. Therefore -EAGAIN is not expected but it's
++             * known to happen sometimes with Linux SCSI. Submit again and hope
++             * the request completes successfully.
++             *
++             * For more information, see:
++             * https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/20210727165811.284510-3-axboe@kernel.dk/T/#u
++             *
++             * If the code is changed to submit other types of requests in the
++             * future, then this workaround may need to be extended to deal with
++             * genuine -EAGAIN results that should not be resubmitted
++             * immediately.
++             */
++            if (ret == -EINTR || ret == -EAGAIN) {
+                 luring_resubmit(s, luringcb);
+                 continue;
+             }
+--
+.31.1

-[Qemu-devel] [PULL 1/1] aio-posix: drop QEMU_AIO_POLL_MAX_NS env var
+[PULL for-6.1 3/3] MAINTAINERS: Added myself as a reviewer for the NVMe Block Driver
-This hunk should not have been merged but I forgot to remove it.  Let's
+From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
 remove it before it slips into a QEMU release.
-¯\_(ツ)_/¯
+I'm interested in following the activity around the NVMe bdrv.
-Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
+Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
-Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
+Message-id: 20210728183340.2018313-1-philmd@redhat.com
 Message-id: 20171103154041.12617-1-stefanha@redhat.com
 Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
 ---
- util/aio-posix.c | 7 -------
+ MAINTAINERS | 1 +
-file changed, 7 deletions(-)
+file changed, 1 insertion(+)
-diff --git a/util/aio-posix.c b/util/aio-posix.c
+diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
 index XXXXXXX..XXXXXXX 100644
---- a/util/aio-posix.c
+--- a/MAINTAINERS
-+++ b/util/aio-posix.c
++++ b/MAINTAINERS
-@@ -XXX,XX +XXX,XX @@ bool aio_poll(AioContext *ctx, bool blocking)
+@@ -XXX,XX +XXX,XX @@ F: block/null.c
+ NVMe Block Driver
- void aio_context_setup(AioContext *ctx)
+ M: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
- {
+ R: Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>
--    /* TODO remove this in final patch submission */
++R: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
--    if (getenv("QEMU_AIO_POLL_MAX_NS")) {
+ L: qemu-block@nongnu.org
--        fprintf(stderr, "The QEMU_AIO_POLL_MAX_NS environment variable has "
+ S: Supported
--                "been replaced with -object iothread,poll-max-ns=NUM\n");
+ F: block/nvme*
 -        exit(1);
 -    }
 -
  #ifdef CONFIG_EPOLL_CREATE1
      assert(!ctx->epollfd);
      ctx->epollfd = epoll_create1(EPOLL_CLOEXEC);
 --
-.13.6
+.31.1

This hunk should not have been merged but I forgot to remove it.  Let's
remove it before it slips into a QEMU release.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20171103154041.12617-1-stefanha@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
---
 util/aio-posix.c | 7 -------
 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/util/aio-posix.c b/util/aio-posix.c
index XXXXXXX..XXXXXXX 100644
--- a/util/aio-posix.c
+++ b/util/aio-posix.c
@@ -XXX,XX +XXX,XX @@ bool aio_poll(AioContext *ctx, bool blocking)
 
 void aio_context_setup(AioContext *ctx)
 {
-    /* TODO remove this in final patch submission */
-    if (getenv("QEMU_AIO_POLL_MAX_NS")) {
-        fprintf(stderr, "The QEMU_AIO_POLL_MAX_NS environment variable has "
-                "been replaced with -object iothread,poll-max-ns=NUM\n");
-        exit(1);
-    }
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_EPOLL_CREATE1
     assert(!ctx->epollfd);
     ctx->epollfd = epoll_create1(EPOLL_CLOEXEC);
-- 
2.13.6

The following changes since commit 3521ade3510eb5cefb2e27a101667f25dad89935:

Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/thuth-gitlab/tags/pull-request-2021-07-29' into staging (2021-07-29 13:17:20 +0100)

are available in the Git repository at:

https://gitlab.com/stefanha/qemu.git tags/block-pull-request

for you to fetch changes up to cc8eecd7f105a1dff5876adeb238a14696061a4a:

MAINTAINERS: Added myself as a reviewer for the NVMe Block Driver (2021-07-29 17:17:34 +0100)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Pull request

The main fix here is for io_uring. Spurious -EAGAIN errors can happen and the
request needs to be resubmitted.

The MAINTAINERS changes carry no risk and we might as well include them in QEMU
6.1.

----------------------------------------------------------------

Fabian Ebner (1):
  block/io_uring: resubmit when result is -EAGAIN

Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (1):
  MAINTAINERS: Added myself as a reviewer for the NVMe Block Driver

Stefano Garzarella (1):
  MAINTAINERS: add Stefano Garzarella as io_uring reviewer

MAINTAINERS      |  2 ++
 block/io_uring.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
2.31.1

From: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>

Linux SCSI can throw spurious -EAGAIN in some corner cases in its
completion path, which will end up being the result in the completed
io_uring request.

Resubmitting such requests should allow block jobs to complete, even
if such spurious errors are encountered.

Co-authored-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Message-id: 20210729091029.65369-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
---
 block/io_uring.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/io_uring.c b/block/io_uring.c
index XXXXXXX..XXXXXXX 100644
--- a/block/io_uring.c
+++ b/block/io_uring.c
@@ -XXX,XX +XXX,XX @@ static void luring_process_completions(LuringState *s)
         total_bytes = ret + luringcb->total_read;
 
         if (ret < 0) {
-            if (ret == -EINTR) {
+            /*
+             * Only writev/readv/fsync requests on regular files or host block
+             * devices are submitted. Therefore -EAGAIN is not expected but it's
+             * known to happen sometimes with Linux SCSI. Submit again and hope
+             * the request completes successfully.
+             *
+             * For more information, see:
+             * https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/20210727165811.284510-3-axboe@kernel.dk/T/#u
+             *
+             * If the code is changed to submit other types of requests in the
+             * future, then this workaround may need to be extended to deal with
+             * genuine -EAGAIN results that should not be resubmitted
+             * immediately.
+             */
+            if (ret == -EINTR || ret == -EAGAIN) {
                 luring_resubmit(s, luringcb);
                 continue;
             }
-- 
2.31.1