On 10/19/2017 09:28 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> The code converting key numbers to QKeyCode in the 'input-send-event'
> command mistakenly accessed the key->u.qcode union field instead of
> the key->u.number field. This is harmless because the fields use the
> same size datatype in both cases, but none the less it should be fixed
> to avoid confusion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
> ---
> ui/input.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
>
> diff --git a/ui/input.c b/ui/input.c
> index 290b47354a..4e821f8f2b 100644
> --- a/ui/input.c
> +++ b/ui/input.c
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ void qmp_input_send_event(bool has_device, const char *device,
> if (evt->type == INPUT_EVENT_KIND_KEY &&
> evt->u.key.data->key->type == KEY_VALUE_KIND_NUMBER) {
> KeyValue *key = evt->u.key.data->key;
> - QKeyCode code = qemu_input_key_number_to_qcode(key->u.qcode.data);
> + QKeyCode code = qemu_input_key_number_to_qcode(key->u.number.data);
> qemu_input_event_send_key_qcode(con, code, evt->u.key.data->down);
> } else {
> qemu_input_event_send(con, evt);
>
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org