Let's properly align the sections first and bail out if we would ever
get called with a memory section we don't know yet.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
index b677d1b13e..2ae459453d 100644
--- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
+++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
@@ -411,15 +411,21 @@ static int kvm_slot_update_flags(KVMMemoryListener *kml, KVMSlot *mem,
static int kvm_section_update_flags(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
MemoryRegionSection *section)
{
- hwaddr phys_addr = section->offset_within_address_space;
- ram_addr_t size = int128_get64(section->size);
- KVMSlot *mem = kvm_lookup_matching_slot(kml, phys_addr, size);
+ hwaddr start_addr, size;
+ KVMSlot *mem;
- if (mem == NULL) {
+ size = kvm_align_section(section, &start_addr);
+ if (!size) {
return 0;
- } else {
- return kvm_slot_update_flags(kml, mem, section->mr);
}
+
+ mem = kvm_lookup_matching_slot(kml, start_addr, size);
+ if (!mem) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "%s: error finding slot\n", __func__);
+ abort();
+ }
+
+ return kvm_slot_update_flags(kml, mem, section->mr);
}
static void kvm_log_start(MemoryListener *listener,
--
2.13.5
On 11.09.2017 19:49, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Let's properly align the sections first and bail out if we would ever
> get called with a memory section we don't know yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
> accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> index b677d1b13e..2ae459453d 100644
> --- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> +++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> @@ -411,15 +411,21 @@ static int kvm_slot_update_flags(KVMMemoryListener *kml, KVMSlot *mem,
> static int kvm_section_update_flags(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
> MemoryRegionSection *section)
> {
> - hwaddr phys_addr = section->offset_within_address_space;
> - ram_addr_t size = int128_get64(section->size);
> - KVMSlot *mem = kvm_lookup_matching_slot(kml, phys_addr, size);
> + hwaddr start_addr, size;
> + KVMSlot *mem;
>
> - if (mem == NULL) {
> + size = kvm_align_section(section, &start_addr);
> + if (!size) {
> return 0;
> - } else {
> - return kvm_slot_update_flags(kml, mem, section->mr);
> }
> +
> + mem = kvm_lookup_matching_slot(kml, start_addr, size);
> + if (!mem) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "%s: error finding slot\n", __func__);
> + abort();
> + }
FYI, this abort now triggers with the "isa-vga" device:
$ x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -S -accel kvm -device isa-vga
kvm_section_update_flags: error finding slot
Aborted (core dumped)
Any ideas how to fix this?
Thomas
On 10/10/2017 11:06, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 11.09.2017 19:49, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> Let's properly align the sections first and bail out if we would ever
>> get called with a memory section we don't know yet.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>> index b677d1b13e..2ae459453d 100644
>> --- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>> +++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>> @@ -411,15 +411,21 @@ static int kvm_slot_update_flags(KVMMemoryListener *kml, KVMSlot *mem,
>> static int kvm_section_update_flags(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
>> MemoryRegionSection *section)
>> {
>> - hwaddr phys_addr = section->offset_within_address_space;
>> - ram_addr_t size = int128_get64(section->size);
>> - KVMSlot *mem = kvm_lookup_matching_slot(kml, phys_addr, size);
>> + hwaddr start_addr, size;
>> + KVMSlot *mem;
>>
>> - if (mem == NULL) {
>> + size = kvm_align_section(section, &start_addr);
>> + if (!size) {
>> return 0;
>> - } else {
>> - return kvm_slot_update_flags(kml, mem, section->mr);
>> }
>> +
>> + mem = kvm_lookup_matching_slot(kml, start_addr, size);
>> + if (!mem) {
>> + fprintf(stderr, "%s: error finding slot\n", __func__);
>> + abort();
>> + }
>
> FYI, this abort now triggers with the "isa-vga" device:
>
> $ x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -S -accel kvm -device isa-vga
> kvm_section_update_flags: error finding slot
> Aborted (core dumped)
>
> Any ideas how to fix this?
Reverting, unless David has some time to look into it.
Paolo
On 10.10.2017 15:29, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 10/10/2017 11:06, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 11.09.2017 19:49, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> Let's properly align the sections first and bail out if we would ever
>>> get called with a memory section we don't know yet.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>>> index b677d1b13e..2ae459453d 100644
>>> --- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>>> +++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>>> @@ -411,15 +411,21 @@ static int kvm_slot_update_flags(KVMMemoryListener *kml, KVMSlot *mem,
>>> static int kvm_section_update_flags(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
>>> MemoryRegionSection *section)
>>> {
>>> - hwaddr phys_addr = section->offset_within_address_space;
>>> - ram_addr_t size = int128_get64(section->size);
>>> - KVMSlot *mem = kvm_lookup_matching_slot(kml, phys_addr, size);
>>> + hwaddr start_addr, size;
>>> + KVMSlot *mem;
>>>
>>> - if (mem == NULL) {
>>> + size = kvm_align_section(section, &start_addr);
>>> + if (!size) {
>>> return 0;
>>> - } else {
>>> - return kvm_slot_update_flags(kml, mem, section->mr);
>>> }
>>> +
>>> + mem = kvm_lookup_matching_slot(kml, start_addr, size);
>>> + if (!mem) {
>>> + fprintf(stderr, "%s: error finding slot\n", __func__);
>>> + abort();
>>> + }
>>
>> FYI, this abort now triggers with the "isa-vga" device:
>>
>> $ x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -S -accel kvm -device isa-vga
>> kvm_section_update_flags: error finding slot
>> Aborted (core dumped)
>>
>> Any ideas how to fix this?
>
> Reverting, unless David has some time to look into it.
>
> Paolo
>
Just returned from vacation, I'll have a look this week.
Thanks for that nice reproducer Thomas, that should help a lot!
--
Thanks,
David
On 16.10.2017 09:16, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 10.10.2017 15:29, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 10/10/2017 11:06, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> On 11.09.2017 19:49, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>> Let's properly align the sections first and bail out if we would ever
>>>> get called with a memory section we don't know yet.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
>>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>>>> index b677d1b13e..2ae459453d 100644
>>>> --- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>>>> +++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>>>> @@ -411,15 +411,21 @@ static int kvm_slot_update_flags(KVMMemoryListener *kml, KVMSlot *mem,
>>>> static int kvm_section_update_flags(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
>>>> MemoryRegionSection *section)
>>>> {
>>>> - hwaddr phys_addr = section->offset_within_address_space;
>>>> - ram_addr_t size = int128_get64(section->size);
>>>> - KVMSlot *mem = kvm_lookup_matching_slot(kml, phys_addr, size);
>>>> + hwaddr start_addr, size;
>>>> + KVMSlot *mem;
>>>>
>>>> - if (mem == NULL) {
>>>> + size = kvm_align_section(section, &start_addr);
>>>> + if (!size) {
>>>> return 0;
>>>> - } else {
>>>> - return kvm_slot_update_flags(kml, mem, section->mr);
>>>> }
>>>> +
>>>> + mem = kvm_lookup_matching_slot(kml, start_addr, size);
>>>> + if (!mem) {
>>>> + fprintf(stderr, "%s: error finding slot\n", __func__);
>>>> + abort();
>>>> + }
>>>
>>> FYI, this abort now triggers with the "isa-vga" device:
>>>
>>> $ x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -S -accel kvm -device isa-vga
>>> kvm_section_update_flags: error finding slot
>>> Aborted (core dumped)
>>>
>>> Any ideas how to fix this?
>>
>> Reverting, unless David has some time to look into it.
>>
>> Paolo
>>
>
> Just returned from vacation, I'll have a look this week.
>
> Thanks for that nice reproducer Thomas, that should help a lot!
FWIW, I've found the problem with the scripts/device-crash-test script,
so you might want to run that, too, before submitting a new version.
Thomas
On 16.10.2017 10:52, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 16.10.2017 09:16, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 10.10.2017 15:29, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 10/10/2017 11:06, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>> On 11.09.2017 19:49, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>>> Let's properly align the sections first and bail out if we would ever
>>>>> get called with a memory section we don't know yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>>>>> index b677d1b13e..2ae459453d 100644
>>>>> --- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>>>>> +++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>>>>> @@ -411,15 +411,21 @@ static int kvm_slot_update_flags(KVMMemoryListener *kml, KVMSlot *mem,
>>>>> static int kvm_section_update_flags(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
>>>>> MemoryRegionSection *section)
>>>>> {
>>>>> - hwaddr phys_addr = section->offset_within_address_space;
>>>>> - ram_addr_t size = int128_get64(section->size);
>>>>> - KVMSlot *mem = kvm_lookup_matching_slot(kml, phys_addr, size);
>>>>> + hwaddr start_addr, size;
>>>>> + KVMSlot *mem;
>>>>>
>>>>> - if (mem == NULL) {
>>>>> + size = kvm_align_section(section, &start_addr);
>>>>> + if (!size) {
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> - } else {
>>>>> - return kvm_slot_update_flags(kml, mem, section->mr);
>>>>> }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + mem = kvm_lookup_matching_slot(kml, start_addr, size);
>>>>> + if (!mem) {
>>>>> + fprintf(stderr, "%s: error finding slot\n", __func__);
>>>>> + abort();
>>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> FYI, this abort now triggers with the "isa-vga" device:
>>>>
>>>> $ x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -S -accel kvm -device isa-vga
>>>> kvm_section_update_flags: error finding slot
>>>> Aborted (core dumped)
>>>>
>>>> Any ideas how to fix this?
>>>
>>> Reverting, unless David has some time to look into it.
>>>
>>> Paolo
>>>
>>
>> Just returned from vacation, I'll have a look this week.
>>
>> Thanks for that nice reproducer Thomas, that should help a lot!
>
> FWIW, I've found the problem with the scripts/device-crash-test script,
> so you might want to run that, too, before submitting a new version.
>
> Thomas
>
This one was easy to fix, there was just one place where the asssumption
"only called with known sections" was wrong.
See "memory: call log_start after region_add"
--
Thanks,
David
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.