On 07/27/2017 12:43 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:42:23PM -0300, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> sizeof(ptr) was used instead of sizeof(struct)...
>>
>> also use g_malloc_n() which take care of possible type overflow.
>>
>> hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c:641:22: warning: The code calls sizeof() on a pointer type. This can produce an unexpected result
>> qdevs = g_malloc(sizeof(qdev) * num);
>> ^ ~~~~~~
>> hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c:648:23: warning: The code calls sizeof() on a pointer type. This can produce an unexpected result
>> qsort(qdevs, num, sizeof(qdev), compare_reg);
>> ^ ~~~~~~
>>
>> Reported-by: Clang Static Analyzer
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
>
> Nack.
>
> Have a closer look, what's going in the array really is pointers, not
> structures. This is a false warning from clang, we need to find a
> different way to suppress it.
Something was bothering me with that patch, wondering why it never
explode previously, now I see/understand.
>> ---
>> hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c
>> index ea3bc8bd9e..9991b44c9f 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c
>> @@ -638,14 +638,14 @@ void spapr_dt_vdevice(VIOsPAPRBus *bus, void *fdt)
>> }
>>
>> /* Copy out into an array of pointers */
/ashamed the comment was in front of me...
Thank you David for the review!
Phil.
>> - qdevs = g_malloc(sizeof(qdev) * num);
>> + qdevs = g_malloc_n(num, sizeof(*qdev));
>> num = 0;
>> QTAILQ_FOREACH(kid, &bus->bus.children, sibling) {
>> qdevs[num++] = kid->child;
>> }
>>
>> /* Sort the array */
>> - qsort(qdevs, num, sizeof(qdev), compare_reg);
>> + qsort(qdevs, num, sizeof(*qdev), compare_reg);
>>
>> /* Hack alert. Give the devices to libfdt in reverse order, we happen
>> * to know that will mean they are in forward order in the tree. */
>