From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

We have to make the address in the old PSW point at the next
instruction, as addressing exceptions are suppressing and not
nullifying.

I assume that there are a lot of other broken cases (as most instructions
we care about are suppressing) - all trigger_pgm_exception() specifying
and explicit number or ILEN_LATER look suspicious, however this is another
story that might require bigger changes (and I have to understand when
the address might already have been incremented first).

This is needed to make an upcoming kvm-unit-test work.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20170529121228.2789-1-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
---
 target/s390x/helper.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/target/s390x/helper.c b/target/s390x/helper.c
index 291db72..a8d20c5 100644
--- a/target/s390x/helper.c
+++ b/target/s390x/helper.c
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ int s390_cpu_handle_mmu_fault(CPUState *cs, vaddr orig_vaddr,
     if (raddr > ram_size) {
         DPRINTF("%s: raddr %" PRIx64 " > ram_size %" PRIx64 "\n", __func__,
                 (uint64_t)raddr, (uint64_t)ram_size);
-        trigger_pgm_exception(env, PGM_ADDRESSING, ILEN_LATER);
+        trigger_pgm_exception(env, PGM_ADDRESSING, ILEN_LATER_INC);
         return 1;
     }
 
-- 
2.9.4