On 2017-06-02 23:02, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 06/02/2017 07:21 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
>> ---
>> block/dirty-bitmap.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/dirty-bitmap.c b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
>> index 90af37287f..f25428868c 100644
>> --- a/block/dirty-bitmap.c
>> +++ b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
>> @@ -42,7 +42,8 @@ struct BdrvDirtyBitmap {
>> BdrvDirtyBitmap *successor; /* Anonymous child; implies frozen status */
>> char *name; /* Optional non-empty unique ID */
>> int64_t size; /* Size of the bitmap (Number of sectors) */
>> - bool disabled; /* Bitmap is read-only */
>> + bool disabled; /* Bitmap is disabled. It skips all writes to
>> + the device */
>
>
> Or, "Bitmap is disabled. Writes to the device are ignored." or similar.
I'd like "It ignores all writes to the device" the most. :-)
("Writes are ignored" sounds a bit like they are ignored in general, not
just by this bitmap; and "it skips" just sounds a bit weird.)
> It's not very important.
Discussing the non-important stuff is the most fun!
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
>
>> int active_iterators; /* How many iterators are active */
>> QLIST_ENTRY(BdrvDirtyBitmap) list;
>> };
>>