This patch specifies and implements the master/slave communication
to support device IOTLB in slave.
The vhost_iotlb_msg structure introduced for kernel backends is
re-used, making the design close between the two backends.
An exception is the use of the secondary channel to enable the
slave to send IOTLB miss requests to the master.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
---
v2:
- spec: fixed possible permission field values
- spec: rewrote "IOMMU support" section
docs/specs/vhost-user.txt | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 117 insertions(+)
diff --git a/docs/specs/vhost-user.txt b/docs/specs/vhost-user.txt
index 5fa7016..0799ef1 100644
--- a/docs/specs/vhost-user.txt
+++ b/docs/specs/vhost-user.txt
@@ -97,6 +97,25 @@ Depending on the request type, payload can be:
log offset: offset from start of supplied file descriptor
where logging starts (i.e. where guest address 0 would be logged)
+ * An IOTLB message
+ ---------------------------------------------------------
+ | iova | size | user address | permissions flags | type |
+ ---------------------------------------------------------
+
+ IOVA: a 64-bit I/O virtual address programmed by the guest
+ Size: a 64-bit size
+ User address: a 64-bit user address
+ Permissions: a 8-bit value:
+ - 0: No access
+ - 1: Read access
+ - 2: Write access
+ - 3: Read/Write access
+ Type: a 8-bit IOTLB message type:
+ - 1: IOTLB miss
+ - 2: IOTLB update
+ - 3: IOTLB invalidate
+ - 4: IOTLB access fail
+
In QEMU the vhost-user message is implemented with the following struct:
typedef struct VhostUserMsg {
@@ -109,6 +128,7 @@ typedef struct VhostUserMsg {
struct vhost_vring_addr addr;
VhostUserMemory memory;
VhostUserLog log;
+ struct vhost_iotlb_msg iotlb;
};
} QEMU_PACKED VhostUserMsg;
@@ -253,6 +273,40 @@ Once the source has finished migration, rings will be stopped by
the source. No further update must be done before rings are
restarted.
+IOMMU support
+-------------
+
+When the VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM feature has been negotiated, the master
+sends IOTLB entries update & invalidation by sending VHOST_USER_IOTLB_MSG
+requests to the slave with a struct vhost_iotlb_msg as payload. For update
+events, the iotlb payload has to be filled with the update message type (2),
+the I/O virtual address, the size, the user virtual address, and the
+permissions flags. Addresses and size must be within vhost memory regions set
+via the VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE request. For invalidation events, the iotlb
+payload has to be filled with the invalidation message type (3), the I/O virtual
+address and the size. On success, the slave is expected to reply with a zero
+payload, non-zero otherwise.
+
+The slave relies on the slave communcation channel (see "Slave communication"
+section below) to send IOTLB miss and access failure events, by sending
+VHOST_USER_SLAVE_IOTLB_MSG requests to the master with a struct vhost_iotlb_msg
+as payload. For miss events, the iotlb payload has to be filled with the miss
+message type (1), the I/O virtual address and the permissions flags. For access
+failure event, the iotlb payload has to be filled with the access failure
+message type (4), the I/O virtual address and the permissions flags.
+For synchronization purpose, the slave may rely on the reply-ack feature,
+so the master may send a reply when operation is completed if the reply-ack
+feature is negotiated and slaves requests a reply. For miss events, completed
+operation means either master sent an update message containing the IOTLB entry
+containing requested address and permission, or master sent nothing if the IOTLB
+miss message is invalid (invalid IOVA or permission).
+
+The master isn't generally expected to take the initiative to send IOTLB update
+messages, as the slave sends IOTLB miss messages for the guest virtual memory
+areas it needs to access. The exception is the rings information addresses
+shared with the VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_ADDR request, for which the master must
+send corresponding IOTLB updates before the rings are enabled.
+
Slave communication
-------------------
@@ -514,6 +568,38 @@ Master message types
If VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK is negotiated, slave must respond
with zero for success, non-zero otherwise.
+ * VHOST_USER_IOTLB_MSG
+
+ Id: 22
+ Equivalent ioctl: N/A (equivalent to VHOST_IOTLB_MSG message type)
+ Master payload: struct vhost_iotlb_msg
+ Slave payload: u64
+
+ Send IOTLB messages with struct vhost_iotlb_msg as payload.
+ Master sends such requests to update and invalidate entries in the device
+ IOTLB. The slave has to acknowledge the request with sending zero as u64
+ payload for success, non-zero otherwise.
+ This request should be send only when VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM feature
+ has been successfully negotiated.
+
+Slave message types
+-------------------
+
+ * VHOST_USER_SLAVE_IOTLB_MSG
+
+ Id: 1
+ Equivalent ioctl: N/A (equivalent to VHOST_IOTLB_MSG message type)
+ Slave payload: struct vhost_iotlb_msg
+ Master payload: N/A
+
+ Send IOTLB messages with struct vhost_iotlb_msg as payload.
+ Slave sends such requests to notify of an IOTLB miss, or an IOTLB
+ access failure. If VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK is negotiated,
+ and slave set the VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY flag, master must respond with
+ zero when operation is successfully completed, or non-zero otherwise.
+ This request should be send only when VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM feature
+ has been successfully negotiated.
+
VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK:
-------------------------------
The original vhost-user specification only demands replies for certain
diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
index ea988fe..170fa68 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
@@ -62,11 +62,13 @@ typedef enum VhostUserRequest {
VHOST_USER_SEND_RARP = 19,
VHOST_USER_NET_SET_MTU = 20,
VHOST_USER_SET_SLAVE_REQ_FD = 21,
+ VHOST_USER_IOTLB_MSG = 22,
VHOST_USER_MAX
} VhostUserRequest;
typedef enum VhostUserSlaveRequest {
VHOST_USER_SLAVE_NONE = 0,
+ VHOST_USER_SLAVE_IOTLB_MSG = 1,
VHOST_USER_SLAVE_MAX
} VhostUserSlaveRequest;
@@ -104,6 +106,7 @@ typedef struct VhostUserMsg {
struct vhost_vring_addr addr;
VhostUserMemory memory;
VhostUserLog log;
+ struct vhost_iotlb_msg iotlb;
} payload;
} QEMU_PACKED VhostUserMsg;
@@ -615,6 +618,9 @@ static void slave_read(void *opaque)
}
switch (msg.request) {
+ case VHOST_USER_SLAVE_IOTLB_MSG:
+ ret = vhost_backend_handle_iotlb_msg(dev, &msg.payload.iotlb);
+ break;
default:
error_report("Received unexpected msg type.");
ret = -EINVAL;
@@ -862,6 +868,29 @@ static int vhost_user_net_set_mtu(struct vhost_dev *dev, uint16_t mtu)
return 0;
}
+static int vhost_user_send_device_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev,
+ struct vhost_iotlb_msg *imsg)
+{
+ VhostUserMsg msg = {
+ .request = VHOST_USER_IOTLB_MSG,
+ .size = sizeof(msg.payload.iotlb),
+ .flags = VHOST_USER_VERSION | VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY_MASK,
+ .payload.iotlb = *imsg,
+ };
+
+ if (vhost_user_write(dev, &msg, NULL, 0) < 0) {
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
+
+ return process_message_reply(dev, msg);
+}
+
+
+static void vhost_user_set_iotlb_callback(struct vhost_dev *dev, int enabled)
+{
+ /* No-op as the receive channel is not dedicated to IOTLB messages. */
+}
+
const VhostOps user_ops = {
.backend_type = VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_USER,
.vhost_backend_init = vhost_user_init,
@@ -886,4 +915,6 @@ const VhostOps user_ops = {
.vhost_migration_done = vhost_user_migration_done,
.vhost_backend_can_merge = vhost_user_can_merge,
.vhost_net_set_mtu = vhost_user_net_set_mtu,
+ .vhost_set_iotlb_callback = vhost_user_set_iotlb_callback,
+ .vhost_send_device_iotlb_msg = vhost_user_send_device_iotlb_msg,
};
--
2.9.4
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 04:28:58PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> This patch specifies and implements the master/slave communication
> to support device IOTLB in slave.
>
> The vhost_iotlb_msg structure introduced for kernel backends is
> re-used, making the design close between the two backends.
>
> An exception is the use of the secondary channel to enable the
> slave to send IOTLB miss requests to the master.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> v2:
> - spec: fixed possible permission field values
> - spec: rewrote "IOMMU support" section
> docs/specs/vhost-user.txt | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 117 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/docs/specs/vhost-user.txt b/docs/specs/vhost-user.txt
> index 5fa7016..0799ef1 100644
> --- a/docs/specs/vhost-user.txt
> +++ b/docs/specs/vhost-user.txt
> @@ -97,6 +97,25 @@ Depending on the request type, payload can be:
> log offset: offset from start of supplied file descriptor
> where logging starts (i.e. where guest address 0 would be logged)
>
> + * An IOTLB message
> + ---------------------------------------------------------
> + | iova | size | user address | permissions flags | type |
> + ---------------------------------------------------------
> +
> + IOVA: a 64-bit I/O virtual address programmed by the guest
> + Size: a 64-bit size
> + User address: a 64-bit user address
> + Permissions: a 8-bit value:
> + - 0: No access
> + - 1: Read access
> + - 2: Write access
> + - 3: Read/Write access
> + Type: a 8-bit IOTLB message type:
> + - 1: IOTLB miss
> + - 2: IOTLB update
> + - 3: IOTLB invalidate
> + - 4: IOTLB access fail
> +
> In QEMU the vhost-user message is implemented with the following struct:
>
> typedef struct VhostUserMsg {
> @@ -109,6 +128,7 @@ typedef struct VhostUserMsg {
> struct vhost_vring_addr addr;
> VhostUserMemory memory;
> VhostUserLog log;
> + struct vhost_iotlb_msg iotlb;
> };
> } QEMU_PACKED VhostUserMsg;
>
> @@ -253,6 +273,40 @@ Once the source has finished migration, rings will be stopped by
> the source. No further update must be done before rings are
> restarted.
>
> +IOMMU support
> +-------------
> +
> +When the VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM feature has been negotiated, the master
> +sends IOTLB entries update & invalidation by sending VHOST_USER_IOTLB_MSG
> +requests to the slave with a struct vhost_iotlb_msg as payload. For update
> +events, the iotlb payload has to be filled with the update message type (2),
> +the I/O virtual address, the size, the user virtual address, and the
> +permissions flags. Addresses and size must be within vhost memory regions set
> +via the VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE request. For invalidation events, the iotlb
> +payload has to be filled with the invalidation message type (3), the I/O virtual
> +address and the size. On success, the slave is expected to reply with a zero
> +payload, non-zero otherwise.
> +
> +The slave relies on the slave communcation channel (see "Slave communication"
> +section below) to send IOTLB miss and access failure events, by sending
> +VHOST_USER_SLAVE_IOTLB_MSG requests to the master with a struct vhost_iotlb_msg
> +as payload. For miss events, the iotlb payload has to be filled with the miss
> +message type (1), the I/O virtual address and the permissions flags. For access
> +failure event, the iotlb payload has to be filled with the access failure
> +message type (4), the I/O virtual address and the permissions flags.
> +For synchronization purpose, the slave may rely on the reply-ack feature,
> +so the master may send a reply when operation is completed if the reply-ack
> +feature is negotiated and slaves requests a reply. For miss events, completed
> +operation means either master sent an update message containing the IOTLB entry
> +containing requested address and permission, or master sent nothing if the IOTLB
> +miss message is invalid (invalid IOVA or permission).
> +
> +The master isn't generally expected to take the initiative to send IOTLB update
> +messages, as the slave sends IOTLB miss messages for the guest virtual memory
> +areas it needs to access. The exception is the rings information addresses
> +shared with the VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_ADDR request, for which the master must
> +send corresponding IOTLB updates before the rings are enabled.
> +
Is the implication that invalidates do not affect ring translations
true? I find this problematic.
If not then can we replace above with "may send"?
> Slave communication
> -------------------
>
> @@ -514,6 +568,38 @@ Master message types
> If VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK is negotiated, slave must respond
> with zero for success, non-zero otherwise.
>
> + * VHOST_USER_IOTLB_MSG
> +
> + Id: 22
> + Equivalent ioctl: N/A (equivalent to VHOST_IOTLB_MSG message type)
> + Master payload: struct vhost_iotlb_msg
> + Slave payload: u64
> +
> + Send IOTLB messages with struct vhost_iotlb_msg as payload.
> + Master sends such requests to update and invalidate entries in the device
> + IOTLB. The slave has to acknowledge the request with sending zero as u64
> + payload for success, non-zero otherwise.
> + This request should be send only when VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM feature
> + has been successfully negotiated.
> +
> +Slave message types
> +-------------------
> +
> + * VHOST_USER_SLAVE_IOTLB_MSG
> +
> + Id: 1
> + Equivalent ioctl: N/A (equivalent to VHOST_IOTLB_MSG message type)
> + Slave payload: struct vhost_iotlb_msg
> + Master payload: N/A
> +
> + Send IOTLB messages with struct vhost_iotlb_msg as payload.
> + Slave sends such requests to notify of an IOTLB miss, or an IOTLB
> + access failure. If VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK is negotiated,
> + and slave set the VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY flag, master must respond with
> + zero when operation is successfully completed, or non-zero otherwise.
> + This request should be send only when VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM feature
> + has been successfully negotiated.
> +
> VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK:
> -------------------------------
> The original vhost-user specification only demands replies for certain
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> index ea988fe..170fa68 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> @@ -62,11 +62,13 @@ typedef enum VhostUserRequest {
> VHOST_USER_SEND_RARP = 19,
> VHOST_USER_NET_SET_MTU = 20,
> VHOST_USER_SET_SLAVE_REQ_FD = 21,
> + VHOST_USER_IOTLB_MSG = 22,
> VHOST_USER_MAX
> } VhostUserRequest;
>
> typedef enum VhostUserSlaveRequest {
> VHOST_USER_SLAVE_NONE = 0,
> + VHOST_USER_SLAVE_IOTLB_MSG = 1,
> VHOST_USER_SLAVE_MAX
> } VhostUserSlaveRequest;
>
> @@ -104,6 +106,7 @@ typedef struct VhostUserMsg {
> struct vhost_vring_addr addr;
> VhostUserMemory memory;
> VhostUserLog log;
> + struct vhost_iotlb_msg iotlb;
> } payload;
> } QEMU_PACKED VhostUserMsg;
>
> @@ -615,6 +618,9 @@ static void slave_read(void *opaque)
> }
>
> switch (msg.request) {
> + case VHOST_USER_SLAVE_IOTLB_MSG:
> + ret = vhost_backend_handle_iotlb_msg(dev, &msg.payload.iotlb);
> + break;
> default:
> error_report("Received unexpected msg type.");
> ret = -EINVAL;
> @@ -862,6 +868,29 @@ static int vhost_user_net_set_mtu(struct vhost_dev *dev, uint16_t mtu)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int vhost_user_send_device_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> + struct vhost_iotlb_msg *imsg)
> +{
> + VhostUserMsg msg = {
> + .request = VHOST_USER_IOTLB_MSG,
> + .size = sizeof(msg.payload.iotlb),
> + .flags = VHOST_USER_VERSION | VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY_MASK,
> + .payload.iotlb = *imsg,
> + };
> +
> + if (vhost_user_write(dev, &msg, NULL, 0) < 0) {
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> +
> + return process_message_reply(dev, msg);
> +}
> +
> +
> +static void vhost_user_set_iotlb_callback(struct vhost_dev *dev, int enabled)
> +{
> + /* No-op as the receive channel is not dedicated to IOTLB messages. */
> +}
> +
> const VhostOps user_ops = {
> .backend_type = VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_USER,
> .vhost_backend_init = vhost_user_init,
> @@ -886,4 +915,6 @@ const VhostOps user_ops = {
> .vhost_migration_done = vhost_user_migration_done,
> .vhost_backend_can_merge = vhost_user_can_merge,
> .vhost_net_set_mtu = vhost_user_net_set_mtu,
> + .vhost_set_iotlb_callback = vhost_user_set_iotlb_callback,
> + .vhost_send_device_iotlb_msg = vhost_user_send_device_iotlb_msg,
> };
> --
> 2.9.4
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.