On 05/10/2017 05:32 AM, guangrong.xiao@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@tencent.com>
>
> Any tick policy specified on other platforms rather on TARGET_I386
> will fall back to LOST_TICK_POLICY_DISCARD silently, this patch makes
> sure only TARGET_I386 can enable LOST_TICK_POLICY_SLEW
>
> After that, we can enable LOST_TICK_POLICY_SLEW in the common code
> which need not use '#ifdef TARGET_I386' to make these code be x86
> specific anymore
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> ---
> hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c b/hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c
> index dac6744..9810bd5 100644
> --- a/hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c
> +++ b/hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c
> @@ -980,19 +980,19 @@ static void rtc_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>
> rtc_set_date_from_host(isadev);
>
> -#ifdef TARGET_I386
> switch (s->lost_tick_policy) {
> +#ifdef TARGET_I386
> case LOST_TICK_POLICY_SLEW:
> s->coalesced_timer =
> timer_new_ns(rtc_clock, rtc_coalesced_timer, s);
> break;
> +#endif
> case LOST_TICK_POLICY_DISCARD:
> break;
> default:
> error_setg(errp, "Invalid lost tick policy.");
> return;
> }
> -#endif
>
> s->periodic_timer = timer_new_ns(rtc_clock, rtc_periodic_timer, s);
> s->update_timer = timer_new_ns(rtc_clock, rtc_update_timer, s);
>