On 05/08/2017 07:55 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> writes:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
>> ---
>> .shippable.yml | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/.shippable.yml b/.shippable.yml
>> index 231c29b620..5170486ff9 100644
>> --- a/.shippable.yml
>> +++ b/.shippable.yml
>> @@ -20,4 +20,4 @@ build:
>> ci:
>> - unset CC
>> - ./configure ${QEMU_CONFIGURE_OPTS} --target-list=${TARGET_LIST}
>> - - make -j2
>> + - make -j$(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN)
>
> Did you ever check what this generates on Shippable? AFAICT they only
> have one core for each docker image. I following the core+1 pattern
> although that may not make as much sense for low core counts.
From the 'Job node info':
$ sudo docker info
Architecture: x86_64
CPUs: 2
Checking at 'ci' stage:
$ echo "container proc:" `getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN` `getconf
_NPROCESSORS_CONF`
container proc: 2 2
I think the correct cores+1 pattern should instead be:
make -j$(($(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN) + 1))
So we stay building at full speed if Shippable eventually upgrade/allow
to use more cores.
Phil.
> --
> Alex Bennée
>