Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
---
block/sheepdog.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/block/sheepdog.c b/block/sheepdog.c
index fb9203e..7e889ee 100644
--- a/block/sheepdog.c
+++ b/block/sheepdog.c
@@ -608,6 +608,7 @@ static int connect_to_sdog(BDRVSheepdogState *s, Error **errp)
qemu_set_nonblock(fd);
} else {
fd = -EIO;
+ error_setg(errp, "Failed to connect to sheepdog server");
}
return fd;
--
2.9.3
On 04/20/2017 01:00 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> ---
> block/sheepdog.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/sheepdog.c b/block/sheepdog.c
> index fb9203e..7e889ee 100644
> --- a/block/sheepdog.c
> +++ b/block/sheepdog.c
> @@ -608,6 +608,7 @@ static int connect_to_sdog(BDRVSheepdogState *s, Error **errp)
> qemu_set_nonblock(fd);
> } else {
> fd = -EIO;
> + error_setg(errp, "Failed to connect to sheepdog server");
> }
>
> return fd;
>
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:00:03PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/sheepdog.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/sheepdog.c b/block/sheepdog.c
> index fb9203e..7e889ee 100644
> --- a/block/sheepdog.c
> +++ b/block/sheepdog.c
> @@ -608,6 +608,7 @@ static int connect_to_sdog(BDRVSheepdogState *s, Error **errp)
> qemu_set_nonblock(fd);
> } else {
> fd = -EIO;
> + error_setg(errp, "Failed to connect to sheepdog server");
> }
A bit odd that we don't just return right away in this function after a
failed called to socket_connect(), but that has nothing to do with your
patch.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
>
> return fd;
> --
> 2.9.3
>
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:00:03PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/sheepdog.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/sheepdog.c b/block/sheepdog.c
> index fb9203e..7e889ee 100644
> --- a/block/sheepdog.c
> +++ b/block/sheepdog.c
> @@ -608,6 +608,7 @@ static int connect_to_sdog(BDRVSheepdogState *s, Error **errp)
> qemu_set_nonblock(fd);
> } else {
> fd = -EIO;
> + error_setg(errp, "Failed to connect to sheepdog server");
> }
>
> return fd;
> --
> 2.9.3
>
Thanks,
Applied to my block branch:
git://github.com/codyprime/qemu-kvm-jtc block
-Jeff
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:00:03PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/sheepdog.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/sheepdog.c b/block/sheepdog.c
> index fb9203e..7e889ee 100644
> --- a/block/sheepdog.c
> +++ b/block/sheepdog.c
> @@ -608,6 +608,7 @@ static int connect_to_sdog(BDRVSheepdogState *s, Error **errp)
> qemu_set_nonblock(fd);
> } else {
> fd = -EIO;
> + error_setg(errp, "Failed to connect to sheepdog server");
> }
This doesn't make much sense to me. The lines just above the
diff context have this:
fd = socket_connect(s->addr, errp, NULL, NULL);
socket_connect should have already reported an error on "errp"
in the scenario that 'fd == -1'. So AFAICT the new error_setg is
just throwing away the real detailed error message in favour of
a generic message.
So I'm puzzelled why we need to change anything - error reporting
should already be working fine.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 04:30:16PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:00:03PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > block/sheepdog.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/sheepdog.c b/block/sheepdog.c
> > index fb9203e..7e889ee 100644
> > --- a/block/sheepdog.c
> > +++ b/block/sheepdog.c
> > @@ -608,6 +608,7 @@ static int connect_to_sdog(BDRVSheepdogState *s, Error **errp)
> > qemu_set_nonblock(fd);
> > } else {
> > fd = -EIO;
> > + error_setg(errp, "Failed to connect to sheepdog server");
> > }
>
> This doesn't make much sense to me. The lines just above the
> diff context have this:
>
> fd = socket_connect(s->addr, errp, NULL, NULL);
>
> socket_connect should have already reported an error on "errp"
> in the scenario that 'fd == -1'. So AFAICT the new error_setg is
> just throwing away the real detailed error message in favour of
> a generic message.
>
> So I'm puzzelled why we need to change anything - error reporting
> should already be working fine.
>
Indeed, you are right. (Dequeuing patch)
It would also make more sense to check fd after the socket_connect() call
and return error then, rather than keep checking fd throughout the rest of
the function.
-Jeff
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:42:00AM -0400, Jeff Cody wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 04:30:16PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:00:03PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > block/sheepdog.c | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/block/sheepdog.c b/block/sheepdog.c
> > > index fb9203e..7e889ee 100644
> > > --- a/block/sheepdog.c
> > > +++ b/block/sheepdog.c
> > > @@ -608,6 +608,7 @@ static int connect_to_sdog(BDRVSheepdogState *s, Error **errp)
> > > qemu_set_nonblock(fd);
> > > } else {
> > > fd = -EIO;
> > > + error_setg(errp, "Failed to connect to sheepdog server");
> > > }
> >
> > This doesn't make much sense to me. The lines just above the
> > diff context have this:
> >
> > fd = socket_connect(s->addr, errp, NULL, NULL);
> >
> > socket_connect should have already reported an error on "errp"
> > in the scenario that 'fd == -1'. So AFAICT the new error_setg is
> > just throwing away the real detailed error message in favour of
> > a generic message.
> >
> > So I'm puzzelled why we need to change anything - error reporting
> > should already be working fine.
> >
>
> Indeed, you are right. (Dequeuing patch)
>
> It would also make more sense to check fd after the socket_connect() call
> and return error then, rather than keep checking fd throughout the rest of
> the function.
Yeah that would make it much more obvious that the error reporting is
correct.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
Am 20.04.2017 um 17:30 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:00:03PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > block/sheepdog.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/sheepdog.c b/block/sheepdog.c
> > index fb9203e..7e889ee 100644
> > --- a/block/sheepdog.c
> > +++ b/block/sheepdog.c
> > @@ -608,6 +608,7 @@ static int connect_to_sdog(BDRVSheepdogState *s, Error **errp)
> > qemu_set_nonblock(fd);
> > } else {
> > fd = -EIO;
> > + error_setg(errp, "Failed to connect to sheepdog server");
> > }
>
> This doesn't make much sense to me. The lines just above the
> diff context have this:
>
> fd = socket_connect(s->addr, errp, NULL, NULL);
>
> socket_connect should have already reported an error on "errp"
> in the scenario that 'fd == -1'.
By the way, am I the only one who thinks that having errp anywhere else
than as the last argument is bad style? I can easily see myself missing
that this functions sets it because the last argument is NULL.
Kevin
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:32:50PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 20.04.2017 um 17:30 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:00:03PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > block/sheepdog.c | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/block/sheepdog.c b/block/sheepdog.c
> > > index fb9203e..7e889ee 100644
> > > --- a/block/sheepdog.c
> > > +++ b/block/sheepdog.c
> > > @@ -608,6 +608,7 @@ static int connect_to_sdog(BDRVSheepdogState *s, Error **errp)
> > > qemu_set_nonblock(fd);
> > > } else {
> > > fd = -EIO;
> > > + error_setg(errp, "Failed to connect to sheepdog server");
> > > }
> >
> > This doesn't make much sense to me. The lines just above the
> > diff context have this:
> >
> > fd = socket_connect(s->addr, errp, NULL, NULL);
> >
> > socket_connect should have already reported an error on "errp"
> > in the scenario that 'fd == -1'.
>
> By the way, am I the only one who thinks that having errp anywhere else
> than as the last argument is bad style? I can easily see myself missing
> that this functions sets it because the last argument is NULL.
>
No, you are not - that is precisely why I missed it in my review.
-Jeff
On Thu, 04/20 22:32, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 20.04.2017 um 17:30 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:00:03PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > block/sheepdog.c | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/block/sheepdog.c b/block/sheepdog.c
> > > index fb9203e..7e889ee 100644
> > > --- a/block/sheepdog.c
> > > +++ b/block/sheepdog.c
> > > @@ -608,6 +608,7 @@ static int connect_to_sdog(BDRVSheepdogState *s, Error **errp)
> > > qemu_set_nonblock(fd);
> > > } else {
> > > fd = -EIO;
> > > + error_setg(errp, "Failed to connect to sheepdog server");
> > > }
> >
> > This doesn't make much sense to me. The lines just above the
> > diff context have this:
> >
> > fd = socket_connect(s->addr, errp, NULL, NULL);
Oops! :(
> >
> > socket_connect should have already reported an error on "errp"
> > in the scenario that 'fd == -1'.
>
> By the way, am I the only one who thinks that having errp anywhere else
> than as the last argument is bad style? I can easily see myself missing
> that this functions sets it because the last argument is NULL.
Hmm, exactly.. Socket code does this here and there, and it's hard to read.
Fam
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.