On 03/07/2017 12:50 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> While we may fail the memory ordering check later that can be
> confusing. So in cases where TARGET_SUPPORT_MTTCG has yet to be
> defined we should say so specifically.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> ---
> cpus.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c
> index 6a817fec13..69e21858b8 100644
> --- a/cpus.c
> +++ b/cpus.c
> @@ -202,6 +202,10 @@ void qemu_tcg_configure(QemuOpts *opts, Error **errp)
> } else if (use_icount) {
> error_setg(errp, "No MTTCG when icount is enabled");
> } else {
> +#ifndef TARGET_SUPPORT_MTTCG
> + error_report("Guest not yet converted to MTTCG - "
> + "you may get unexpected results");
> +#endif
> if (!check_tcg_memory_orders_compatible()) {
> error_report("Guest expects a stronger memory ordering "
> "than the host provides");
>