[PATCH v2 0/3] Some watchpoint-related patches

Pavel Dovgalyuk posted 3 patches 4 years, 2 months ago
Test checkpatch passed
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu tags/patchew/163662450348.125458.5494710452733592356.stgit@pasha-ThinkPad-X280
Maintainers: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c |  5 +++++
softmmu/physmem.c    | 14 ++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
[PATCH v2 0/3] Some watchpoint-related patches
Posted by Pavel Dovgalyuk 4 years, 2 months ago
The series includes several watchpoint-related patches.

v2 changes:
 - added patch to fix races with interrupts
 - added patch to process watchpoints-on-stack
 - removed upstreamed patches

---

Pavel Dovgalyuk (3):
      icount: preserve cflags when custom tb is about to execute
      softmmu: fix watchpoint-interrupt races
      softmmu: fix watchpoints on memory used by vCPU internals


 accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c |  5 +++++
 softmmu/physmem.c    | 14 ++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)

--
Pavel Dovgalyuk

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Some watchpoint-related patches
Posted by David Hildenbrand 4 years, 2 months ago
On 11.11.21 10:55, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
> The series includes several watchpoint-related patches.
> 
> v2 changes:
>  - added patch to fix races with interrupts
>  - added patch to process watchpoints-on-stack
>  - removed upstreamed patches

Out of interest, do we have any reproducer / tests for this?


-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb


Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Some watchpoint-related patches
Posted by Pavel Dovgalyuk 4 years, 2 months ago
On 11.11.2021 13:48, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 11.11.21 10:55, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
>> The series includes several watchpoint-related patches.
>>
>> v2 changes:
>>   - added patch to fix races with interrupts
>>   - added patch to process watchpoints-on-stack
>>   - removed upstreamed patches
> 
> Out of interest, do we have any reproducer / tests for this?
> 

I guess no.