[PATCH v5 03/12] migration/dirtyrate: Add RamlockDirtyInfo to store sampled page info

Chuan Zheng posted 12 patches 5 years, 5 months ago
Maintainers: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v5 03/12] migration/dirtyrate: Add RamlockDirtyInfo to store sampled page info
Posted by Chuan Zheng 5 years, 5 months ago
Add RamlockDirtyInfo to store sampled page info of each ramblock.

Signed-off-by: Chuan Zheng <zhengchuan@huawei.com>
---
 migration/dirtyrate.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/migration/dirtyrate.h b/migration/dirtyrate.h
index 33669b7..dc45419 100644
--- a/migration/dirtyrate.h
+++ b/migration/dirtyrate.h
@@ -19,6 +19,11 @@
  */
 #define DIRTYRATE_DEFAULT_SAMPLE_PAGES            512
 
+/*
+ * Record ramblock idstr
+ */
+#define RAMBLOCK_INFO_MAX_LEN                     256
+
 /* Take 1s as default for calculation duration */
 #define DEFAULT_FETCH_DIRTYRATE_TIME_SEC          1
 
@@ -27,6 +32,19 @@ struct DirtyRateConfig {
     int64_t sample_period_seconds; /* time duration between two sampling */
 };
 
+/*
+ * Store dirtypage info for each ramblock.
+ */
+struct RamblockDirtyInfo {
+    char idstr[RAMBLOCK_INFO_MAX_LEN]; /* idstr for each ramblock */
+    uint8_t *ramblock_addr; /* base address of ramblock we measure */
+    uint64_t ramblock_pages; /* ramblock size in 4K-page */
+    uint64_t *sample_page_vfn; /* relative offset address for sampled page */
+    uint64_t sample_pages_count; /* count of sampled pages */
+    uint64_t sample_dirty_count; /* count of dirty pages we measure */
+    uint32_t *hash_result; /* array of hash result for sampled pages */
+};
+
 void *get_dirtyrate_thread(void *arg);
 #endif
 
-- 
1.8.3.1


Re: [PATCH v5 03/12] migration/dirtyrate: Add RamlockDirtyInfo to store sampled page info
Posted by Dr. David Alan Gilbert 5 years, 5 months ago
* Chuan Zheng (zhengchuan@huawei.com) wrote:
> Add RamlockDirtyInfo to store sampled page info of each ramblock.

Note typo 'RAM*B*lockDirtyInfo' (and in the title.

> Signed-off-by: Chuan Zheng <zhengchuan@huawei.com>
> ---
>  migration/dirtyrate.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/migration/dirtyrate.h b/migration/dirtyrate.h
> index 33669b7..dc45419 100644
> --- a/migration/dirtyrate.h
> +++ b/migration/dirtyrate.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,11 @@
>   */
>  #define DIRTYRATE_DEFAULT_SAMPLE_PAGES            512
>  
> +/*
> + * Record ramblock idstr
> + */
> +#define RAMBLOCK_INFO_MAX_LEN                     256
> +
>  /* Take 1s as default for calculation duration */
>  #define DEFAULT_FETCH_DIRTYRATE_TIME_SEC          1
>  
> @@ -27,6 +32,19 @@ struct DirtyRateConfig {
>      int64_t sample_period_seconds; /* time duration between two sampling */
>  };
>  
> +/*
> + * Store dirtypage info for each ramblock.
> + */
> +struct RamblockDirtyInfo {
> +    char idstr[RAMBLOCK_INFO_MAX_LEN]; /* idstr for each ramblock */
> +    uint8_t *ramblock_addr; /* base address of ramblock we measure */
> +    uint64_t ramblock_pages; /* ramblock size in 4K-page */
> +    uint64_t *sample_page_vfn; /* relative offset address for sampled page */
> +    uint64_t sample_pages_count; /* count of sampled pages */
> +    uint64_t sample_dirty_count; /* count of dirty pages we measure */

I see you've already fixed that one that David Edmondson commented on; I
thin you actually posted this as a second v5.

Since it's fixed, with the RAM*B*lock typo fixed;


Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>

> +    uint32_t *hash_result; /* array of hash result for sampled pages */
> +};
> +
>  void *get_dirtyrate_thread(void *arg);
>  #endif
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 
-- 
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK