[PATCH V5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64

guoren@kernel.org posted 1 patch 4 years, 6 months ago
Test checkpatch passed
Test docker-mingw@fedora passed
Test docker-quick@centos7 passed
Test docker-clang@ubuntu passed
Test asan passed
Test FreeBSD passed
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu tags/patchew/1569413099-6859-1-git-send-email-guoren@kernel.org
Maintainers: Sagar Karandikar <sagark@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>, Bastian Koppelmann <kbastian@mail.uni-paderborn.de>, Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@wdc.com>
There is a newer version of this series
target/riscv/cpu_bits.h   | 7 +++++++
target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH V5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64
Posted by guoren@kernel.org 4 years, 6 months ago
From: Guo Ren <ren_guo@c-sky.com>

Highest 10 bits of PTE are reserved in riscv-privileged, ref: [1], so we
need to ignore them. They cannot be a part of ppn.

1: The RISC-V Instruction Set Manual, Volume II: Privileged Architecture
   4.4 Sv39: Page-Based 39-bit Virtual-Memory System
   4.5 Sv48: Page-Based 48-bit Virtual-Memory System

Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <ren_guo@c-sky.com>
Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu_bits.h   | 7 +++++++
 target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

 Changelog V5:
  - Update Reviewer and Tester.

 Changelog V4:
  - Change title to Ignore not Bugfix
  - Use PTE_PPN_MASK for RV32 and RV64

 Changelog V3:
  - Use UUL define for PTE_RESERVED
  - Keep ppn >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT

 Changelog V2:
  - Bugfix pte destroyed cause boot fail
  - Change to AND with a mask instead of shifting both directions

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
index e998348..399c2c6 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
@@ -473,6 +473,13 @@
 /* Page table PPN shift amount */
 #define PTE_PPN_SHIFT       10
 
+/* Page table PPN mask */
+#if defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
+#define PTE_PPN_MASK        0xffffffffUL
+#elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
+#define PTE_PPN_MASK        0x3fffffffffffffULL
+#endif
+
 /* Leaf page shift amount */
 #define PGSHIFT             12
 
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
index 87dd6a6..9961b37 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ restart:
 #elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
         target_ulong pte = ldq_phys(cs->as, pte_addr);
 #endif
-        hwaddr ppn = pte >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
+        hwaddr ppn = (pte & PTE_PPN_MASK) >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
 
         if (!(pte & PTE_V)) {
             /* Invalid PTE */
-- 
2.7.4


Re: [PATCH V5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64
Posted by Alistair Francis 4 years, 6 months ago
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 5:05 AM <guoren@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Guo Ren <ren_guo@c-sky.com>
>
> Highest 10 bits of PTE are reserved in riscv-privileged, ref: [1], so we
> need to ignore them. They cannot be a part of ppn.
>
> 1: The RISC-V Instruction Set Manual, Volume II: Privileged Architecture
>    4.4 Sv39: Page-Based 39-bit Virtual-Memory System
>    4.5 Sv48: Page-Based 48-bit Virtual-Memory System
>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <ren_guo@c-sky.com>
> Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Liu Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com>
> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>

Alistair

> ---
>  target/riscv/cpu_bits.h   | 7 +++++++
>  target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>  Changelog V5:
>   - Update Reviewer and Tester.
>
>  Changelog V4:
>   - Change title to Ignore not Bugfix
>   - Use PTE_PPN_MASK for RV32 and RV64
>
>  Changelog V3:
>   - Use UUL define for PTE_RESERVED
>   - Keep ppn >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT
>
>  Changelog V2:
>   - Bugfix pte destroyed cause boot fail
>   - Change to AND with a mask instead of shifting both directions
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> index e998348..399c2c6 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> @@ -473,6 +473,13 @@
>  /* Page table PPN shift amount */
>  #define PTE_PPN_SHIFT       10
>
> +/* Page table PPN mask */
> +#if defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
> +#define PTE_PPN_MASK        0xffffffffUL
> +#elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
> +#define PTE_PPN_MASK        0x3fffffffffffffULL
> +#endif
> +
>  /* Leaf page shift amount */
>  #define PGSHIFT             12
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> index 87dd6a6..9961b37 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ restart:
>  #elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
>          target_ulong pte = ldq_phys(cs->as, pte_addr);
>  #endif
> -        hwaddr ppn = pte >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
> +        hwaddr ppn = (pte & PTE_PPN_MASK) >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
>
>          if (!(pte & PTE_V)) {
>              /* Invalid PTE */
> --
> 2.7.4
>

Re: [PATCH V5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64
Posted by Guo Ren 4 years, 6 months ago
Thx, Sincerely

On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 6:52 AM Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 5:05 AM <guoren@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Guo Ren <ren_guo@c-sky.com>
> >
> > Highest 10 bits of PTE are reserved in riscv-privileged, ref: [1], so we
> > need to ignore them. They cannot be a part of ppn.
> >
> > 1: The RISC-V Instruction Set Manual, Volume II: Privileged Architecture
> >    4.4 Sv39: Page-Based 39-bit Virtual-Memory System
> >    4.5 Sv48: Page-Based 48-bit Virtual-Memory System
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <ren_guo@c-sky.com>
> > Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Liu Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
>
> Alistair
>
> > ---
> >  target/riscv/cpu_bits.h   | 7 +++++++
> >  target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >  Changelog V5:
> >   - Update Reviewer and Tester.
> >
> >  Changelog V4:
> >   - Change title to Ignore not Bugfix
> >   - Use PTE_PPN_MASK for RV32 and RV64
> >
> >  Changelog V3:
> >   - Use UUL define for PTE_RESERVED
> >   - Keep ppn >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT
> >
> >  Changelog V2:
> >   - Bugfix pte destroyed cause boot fail
> >   - Change to AND with a mask instead of shifting both directions
> >
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> > index e998348..399c2c6 100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> > @@ -473,6 +473,13 @@
> >  /* Page table PPN shift amount */
> >  #define PTE_PPN_SHIFT       10
> >
> > +/* Page table PPN mask */
> > +#if defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
> > +#define PTE_PPN_MASK        0xffffffffUL
> > +#elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
> > +#define PTE_PPN_MASK        0x3fffffffffffffULL
> > +#endif
> > +
> >  /* Leaf page shift amount */
> >  #define PGSHIFT             12
> >
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> > index 87dd6a6..9961b37 100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> > @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ restart:
> >  #elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
> >          target_ulong pte = ldq_phys(cs->as, pte_addr);
> >  #endif
> > -        hwaddr ppn = pte >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
> > +        hwaddr ppn = (pte & PTE_PPN_MASK) >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
> >
> >          if (!(pte & PTE_V)) {
> >              /* Invalid PTE */
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >



-- 
Best Regards
 Guo Ren

ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/