We're going to use the s390x boot code for testing CD-ROM booting.
But the ISO loader of the s390-ccw bios is a little bit more picky
than the network loader and expects some magic bytes in the header
of the file (see linux_s390_magic in pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c), so
we've got to add them in our boot code here, too.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
tests/boot-sector.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/boot-sector.c b/tests/boot-sector.c
index c373f0e..04721c9 100644
--- a/tests/boot-sector.c
+++ b/tests/boot-sector.c
@@ -68,8 +68,11 @@ static uint8_t x86_boot_sector[512] = {
};
/* For s390x, use a mini "kernel" with the appropriate signature */
-static const uint8_t s390x_psw[] = {
- 0x00, 0x08, 0x00, 0x00, 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00
+static const uint8_t s390x_psw_and_magic[] = {
+ 0x00, 0x08, 0x00, 0x00, 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00,
+ 0x02, 0x00, 0x00, 0x18, 0x60, 0x00, 0x00, 0x50,
+ 0x02, 0x00, 0x00, 0x68, 0x60, 0x00, 0x00, 0x50,
+ 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40
};
static const uint8_t s390x_code[] = {
0xa7, 0xf4, 0x00, 0x0a, /* j 0x10010 */
@@ -110,7 +113,7 @@ int boot_sector_init(char *fname)
} else if (g_str_equal(arch, "s390x")) {
len = 0x10000 + sizeof(s390x_code);
boot_code = g_malloc0(len);
- memcpy(boot_code, s390x_psw, sizeof(s390x_psw));
+ memcpy(boot_code, s390x_psw_and_magic, sizeof(s390x_psw_and_magic));
memcpy(&boot_code[0x10000], s390x_code, sizeof(s390x_code));
} else {
g_assert_not_reached();
--
1.8.3.1
On 03/15/2018 08:49 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> We're going to use the s390x boot code for testing CD-ROM booting.
> But the ISO loader of the s390-ccw bios is a little bit more picky
> than the network loader and expects some magic bytes in the header
> of the file (see linux_s390_magic in pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c), so
> we've got to add them in our boot code here, too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> ---
> tests/boot-sector.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/boot-sector.c b/tests/boot-sector.c
> index c373f0e..04721c9 100644
> --- a/tests/boot-sector.c
> +++ b/tests/boot-sector.c
> @@ -68,8 +68,11 @@ static uint8_t x86_boot_sector[512] = {
> };
>
> /* For s390x, use a mini "kernel" with the appropriate signature */
> -static const uint8_t s390x_psw[] = {
> - 0x00, 0x08, 0x00, 0x00, 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00
> +static const uint8_t s390x_psw_and_magic[] = {
> + 0x00, 0x08, 0x00, 0x00, 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00,
> + 0x02, 0x00, 0x00, 0x18, 0x60, 0x00, 0x00, 0x50,
> + 0x02, 0x00, 0x00, 0x68, 0x60, 0x00, 0x00, 0x50,
> + 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40
> };
> static const uint8_t s390x_code[] = {
> 0xa7, 0xf4, 0x00, 0x0a, /* j 0x10010 */
> @@ -110,7 +113,7 @@ int boot_sector_init(char *fname)
> } else if (g_str_equal(arch, "s390x")) {
> len = 0x10000 + sizeof(s390x_code);
> boot_code = g_malloc0(len);
> - memcpy(boot_code, s390x_psw, sizeof(s390x_psw));
> + memcpy(boot_code, s390x_psw_and_magic, sizeof(s390x_psw_and_magic));
> memcpy(&boot_code[0x10000], s390x_code, sizeof(s390x_code));
> } else {
> g_assert_not_reached();
>
On 03/15/2018 08:49 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> We're going to use the s390x boot code for testing CD-ROM booting.
> But the ISO loader of the s390-ccw bios is a little bit more picky
> than the network loader and expects some magic bytes in the header
> of the file (see linux_s390_magic in pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c), so
> we've got to add them in our boot code here, too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
> tests/boot-sector.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/boot-sector.c b/tests/boot-sector.c
> index c373f0e..04721c9 100644
> --- a/tests/boot-sector.c
> +++ b/tests/boot-sector.c
> @@ -68,8 +68,11 @@ static uint8_t x86_boot_sector[512] = {
> };
>
> /* For s390x, use a mini "kernel" with the appropriate signature */
> -static const uint8_t s390x_psw[] = {
> - 0x00, 0x08, 0x00, 0x00, 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00
> +static const uint8_t s390x_psw_and_magic[] = {
Can you add a comment such "see linux_s390_magic in
pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c"?
> + 0x00, 0x08, 0x00, 0x00, 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00,
> + 0x02, 0x00, 0x00, 0x18, 0x60, 0x00, 0x00, 0x50,
> + 0x02, 0x00, 0x00, 0x68, 0x60, 0x00, 0x00, 0x50,
> + 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40
> };
> static const uint8_t s390x_code[] = {
> 0xa7, 0xf4, 0x00, 0x0a, /* j 0x10010 */
> @@ -110,7 +113,7 @@ int boot_sector_init(char *fname)
> } else if (g_str_equal(arch, "s390x")) {
> len = 0x10000 + sizeof(s390x_code);
> boot_code = g_malloc0(len);
> - memcpy(boot_code, s390x_psw, sizeof(s390x_psw));
> + memcpy(boot_code, s390x_psw_and_magic, sizeof(s390x_psw_and_magic));
> memcpy(&boot_code[0x10000], s390x_code, sizeof(s390x_code));
> } else {
> g_assert_not_reached();
>
On 15.03.2018 12:47, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 03/15/2018 08:49 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> We're going to use the s390x boot code for testing CD-ROM booting.
>> But the ISO loader of the s390-ccw bios is a little bit more picky
>> than the network loader and expects some magic bytes in the header
>> of the file (see linux_s390_magic in pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c), so
>> we've got to add them in our boot code here, too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> tests/boot-sector.c | 9 ++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/boot-sector.c b/tests/boot-sector.c
>> index c373f0e..04721c9 100644
>> --- a/tests/boot-sector.c
>> +++ b/tests/boot-sector.c
>> @@ -68,8 +68,11 @@ static uint8_t x86_boot_sector[512] = {
>> };
>>
>> /* For s390x, use a mini "kernel" with the appropriate signature */
>> -static const uint8_t s390x_psw[] = {
>> - 0x00, 0x08, 0x00, 0x00, 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00
>> +static const uint8_t s390x_psw_and_magic[] = {
>
> Can you add a comment such "see linux_s390_magic in
> pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c"?
Sure, I'll add a comment.
Thomas
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:47:08PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 03/15/2018 08:49 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > We're going to use the s390x boot code for testing CD-ROM booting.
> > But the ISO loader of the s390-ccw bios is a little bit more picky
> > than the network loader and expects some magic bytes in the header
> > of the file (see linux_s390_magic in pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c), so
> > we've got to add them in our boot code here, too.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > tests/boot-sector.c | 9 ++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/boot-sector.c b/tests/boot-sector.c
> > index c373f0e..04721c9 100644
> > --- a/tests/boot-sector.c
> > +++ b/tests/boot-sector.c
> > @@ -68,8 +68,11 @@ static uint8_t x86_boot_sector[512] = {
> > };
> >
> > /* For s390x, use a mini "kernel" with the appropriate signature */
> > -static const uint8_t s390x_psw[] = {
> > - 0x00, 0x08, 0x00, 0x00, 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00
> > +static const uint8_t s390x_psw_and_magic[] = {
>
> Can you add a comment such "see linux_s390_magic in
> pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c"?
Or better yet, copy the code comment from there.
> > + 0x00, 0x08, 0x00, 0x00, 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00,
> > + 0x02, 0x00, 0x00, 0x18, 0x60, 0x00, 0x00, 0x50,
> > + 0x02, 0x00, 0x00, 0x68, 0x60, 0x00, 0x00, 0x50,
> > + 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40
> > };
> > static const uint8_t s390x_code[] = {
> > 0xa7, 0xf4, 0x00, 0x0a, /* j 0x10010 */
> > @@ -110,7 +113,7 @@ int boot_sector_init(char *fname)
> > } else if (g_str_equal(arch, "s390x")) {
> > len = 0x10000 + sizeof(s390x_code);
> > boot_code = g_malloc0(len);
> > - memcpy(boot_code, s390x_psw, sizeof(s390x_psw));
> > + memcpy(boot_code, s390x_psw_and_magic, sizeof(s390x_psw_and_magic));
> > memcpy(&boot_code[0x10000], s390x_code, sizeof(s390x_code));
> > } else {
> > g_assert_not_reached();
> >
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.