The hook already skips a set of rpm upgrade artifacts.
Do the same with such files that might be created by dpkg.
Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1484990
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
---
scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook b/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
index c27b29f..13aafd4 100755
--- a/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
+++ b/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ FSFREEZE_D=$(dirname -- "$0")/fsfreeze-hook.d
# Check whether file $1 is a backup or rpm-generated file and should be ignored
is_ignored_file() {
case "$1" in
- *~ | *.bak | *.orig | *.rpmnew | *.rpmorig | *.rpmsave | *.sample)
+ *~ | *.bak | *.orig | *.rpmnew | *.rpmorig | *.rpmsave | *.sample | *.dpkg-old | *.dpkg-new | *.dpkg-tmp | *.dpkg-dist | *.dpkg-bak | *.dpkg-backup | *.dpkg-remove)
return 0 ;;
esac
return 1
--
2.7.4
Hi,
maybe I missed a formal thing on this submission, but I don't see it right away.
So for now just a ping on any updates in regard to accept this?
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Christian Ehrhardt
<christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> wrote:
> The hook already skips a set of rpm upgrade artifacts.
> Do the same with such files that might be created by dpkg.
>
> Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1484990
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
> ---
> scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook b/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
> index c27b29f..13aafd4 100755
> --- a/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
> +++ b/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ FSFREEZE_D=$(dirname -- "$0")/fsfreeze-hook.d
> # Check whether file $1 is a backup or rpm-generated file and should be ignored
> is_ignored_file() {
> case "$1" in
> - *~ | *.bak | *.orig | *.rpmnew | *.rpmorig | *.rpmsave | *.sample)
> + *~ | *.bak | *.orig | *.rpmnew | *.rpmorig | *.rpmsave | *.sample | *.dpkg-old | *.dpkg-new | *.dpkg-tmp | *.dpkg-dist | *.dpkg-bak | *.dpkg-backup | *.dpkg-remove)
> return 0 ;;
> esac
> return 1
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Christian Ehrhardt
Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd
Re-Ping for consideration?
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 3:03 PM, Christian Ehrhardt <
christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> maybe I missed a formal thing on this submission, but I don't see it right
> away.
> So for now just a ping on any updates in regard to accept this?
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Christian Ehrhardt
> <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> wrote:
> > The hook already skips a set of rpm upgrade artifacts.
> > Do the same with such files that might be created by dpkg.
> >
> > Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1484990
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
> > ---
> > scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
> b/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
> > index c27b29f..13aafd4 100755
> > --- a/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
> > +++ b/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
> > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ FSFREEZE_D=$(dirname -- "$0")/fsfreeze-hook.d
> > # Check whether file $1 is a backup or rpm-generated file and should be
> ignored
> > is_ignored_file() {
> > case "$1" in
> > - *~ | *.bak | *.orig | *.rpmnew | *.rpmorig | *.rpmsave |
> *.sample)
> > + *~ | *.bak | *.orig | *.rpmnew | *.rpmorig | *.rpmsave |
> *.sample | *.dpkg-old | *.dpkg-new | *.dpkg-tmp | *.dpkg-dist | *.dpkg-bak
> | *.dpkg-backup | *.dpkg-remove)
> > return 0 ;;
> > esac
> > return 1
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Christian Ehrhardt
> Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server
> Canonical Ltd
>
--
Christian Ehrhardt
Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd
Hi Christian,
On 04/09/2018 04:18 AM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> Re-Ping for consideration?
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 3:03 PM, Christian Ehrhardt <
> christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> maybe I missed a formal thing on this submission, but I don't see it right
>> away.
You missed to Cc the maintainer of this file:
$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (maintainer:QEMU Guest Agent)
(I Cc'ed him).
See https://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch#CC_the_relevant_maintainer
>> So for now just a ping on any updates in regard to accept this?
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Christian Ehrhardt
>> <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> wrote:
>>> The hook already skips a set of rpm upgrade artifacts.
>>> Do the same with such files that might be created by dpkg.
>>>
>>> Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1484990
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
>>> ---
>>> scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
>> b/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
>>> index c27b29f..13aafd4 100755
>>> --- a/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
>>> +++ b/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
>>> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ FSFREEZE_D=$(dirname -- "$0")/fsfreeze-hook.d
>>> # Check whether file $1 is a backup or rpm-generated file and should be
>> ignored
>>> is_ignored_file() {
>>> case "$1" in
>>> - *~ | *.bak | *.orig | *.rpmnew | *.rpmorig | *.rpmsave |
>> *.sample)
>>> + *~ | *.bak | *.orig | *.rpmnew | *.rpmorig | *.rpmsave |
>> *.sample | *.dpkg-old | *.dpkg-new | *.dpkg-tmp | *.dpkg-dist | *.dpkg-bak
>> | *.dpkg-backup | *.dpkg-remove)
>>> return 0 ;;
>>> esac
>>> return 1
>>> --
>>> 2.7.4
Hi Paolo,
On 04/24/2018 10:01 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> On 04/09/2018 04:18 AM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
>> Re-Ping for consideration?
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 3:03 PM, Christian Ehrhardt <
>> christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> maybe I missed a formal thing on this submission, but I don't see it right
>>> away.
>
> You missed to Cc the maintainer of this file:
>
> $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
> Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (maintainer:QEMU Guest Agent)
>
> (I Cc'ed him).
>
> See https://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch#CC_the_relevant_maintainer
>
>>> So for now just a ping on any updates in regard to accept this?
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Christian Ehrhardt
>>> <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> wrote:
>>>> The hook already skips a set of rpm upgrade artifacts.
>>>> Do the same with such files that might be created by dpkg.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1484990
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Can you take this patch via your MISC tree?
>>>> ---
>>>> scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook | 2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
>>> b/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
>>>> index c27b29f..13aafd4 100755
>>>> --- a/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
>>>> +++ b/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
>>>> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ FSFREEZE_D=$(dirname -- "$0")/fsfreeze-hook.d
>>>> # Check whether file $1 is a backup or rpm-generated file and should be
>>> ignored
>>>> is_ignored_file() {
>>>> case "$1" in
>>>> - *~ | *.bak | *.orig | *.rpmnew | *.rpmorig | *.rpmsave |
>>> *.sample)
>>>> + *~ | *.bak | *.orig | *.rpmnew | *.rpmorig | *.rpmsave |
>>> *.sample | *.dpkg-old | *.dpkg-new | *.dpkg-tmp | *.dpkg-dist | *.dpkg-bak
>>> | *.dpkg-backup | *.dpkg-remove)
>>>> return 0 ;;
>>>> esac
>>>> return 1
>>>> --
>>>> 2.7.4
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 8:47 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> On 04/24/2018 10:01 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > Hi Christian,
> >
> > On 04/09/2018 04:18 AM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> >> Re-Ping for consideration?
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 3:03 PM, Christian Ehrhardt <
> >> christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>> maybe I missed a formal thing on this submission, but I don't see it
> right
> >>> away.
> >
> > You missed to Cc the maintainer of this file:
> >
> > $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
> > Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (maintainer:QEMU Guest Agent)
> >
> > (I Cc'ed him).
> >
> > See
> https://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch#CC_the_relevant_maintainer
> >
> >>> So for now just a ping on any updates in regard to accept this?
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Christian Ehrhardt
> >>> <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> wrote:
> >>>> The hook already skips a set of rpm upgrade artifacts.
> >>>> Do the same with such files that might be created by dpkg.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1484990
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
>
> Can you take this patch via your MISC tree?
>
Even after Philippe back then helped to make sure CCs are better nothing
happened.
Therefore kindly re-ping for this to be included.
>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook | 2 +-
> >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
> >>> b/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
> >>>> index c27b29f..13aafd4 100755
> >>>> --- a/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
> >>>> +++ b/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook
> >>>> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ FSFREEZE_D=$(dirname -- "$0")/fsfreeze-hook.d
> >>>> # Check whether file $1 is a backup or rpm-generated file and should
> be
> >>> ignored
> >>>> is_ignored_file() {
> >>>> case "$1" in
> >>>> - *~ | *.bak | *.orig | *.rpmnew | *.rpmorig | *.rpmsave |
> >>> *.sample)
> >>>> + *~ | *.bak | *.orig | *.rpmnew | *.rpmorig | *.rpmsave |
> >>> *.sample | *.dpkg-old | *.dpkg-new | *.dpkg-tmp | *.dpkg-dist |
> *.dpkg-bak
> >>> | *.dpkg-backup | *.dpkg-remove)
> >>>> return 0 ;;
> >>>> esac
> >>>> return 1
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.7.4
>
--
Christian Ehrhardt
Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd
On 20/08/2018 12:54, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 8:47 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org > <mailto:f4bug@amsat.org>> wrote: > > Hi Paolo, > > On 04/24/2018 10:01 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > > > On 04/09/2018 04:18 AM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > >> Re-Ping for consideration? > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 3:03 PM, Christian Ehrhardt < > >> christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com > <mailto:christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> maybe I missed a formal thing on this submission, but I don't > see it right > >>> away. > > > > You missed to Cc the maintainer of this file: > > > > $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl <http://get_maintainer.pl> -f > scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook > > Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com > <mailto:mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> (maintainer:QEMU Guest Agent) > > > > (I Cc'ed him). > > > > See > https://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch#CC_the_relevant_maintainer > > > >>> So for now just a ping on any updates in regard to accept this? > >>> > >>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Christian Ehrhardt > >>> <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com > <mailto:christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>> wrote: > >>>> The hook already skips a set of rpm upgrade artifacts. > >>>> Do the same with such files that might be created by dpkg. > >>>> > >>>> Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1484990 > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt > <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com > <mailto:christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>> > > > > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org > <mailto:f4bug@amsat.org>> > > Can you take this patch via your MISC tree? > > > Even after Philippe back then helped to make sure CCs are better nothing > happened. > Therefore kindly re-ping for this to be included. Queued, thanks. Paolo
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.