On 12/01/2017 03:44 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> When we added the ARMMMUIdx_MSUser MMU index we forgot to
> add it to the case statement in regime_is_user(), so we
> weren't treating it as unprivileged when doing MPU lookups.
> Correct the omission.
Eh commit e7b921c2d9e wasn't reviewed!
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> ---
> target/arm/helper.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
> index f21c142..c4c8d5a 100644
> --- a/target/arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target/arm/helper.c
> @@ -8016,6 +8016,7 @@ static inline bool regime_is_user(CPUARMState *env, ARMMMUIdx mmu_idx)
> case ARMMMUIdx_S1SE0:
> case ARMMMUIdx_S1NSE0:
> case ARMMMUIdx_MUser:
> + case ARMMMUIdx_MSUser:
> return true;
> default:
> return false;
>