On 31/07/2017 18:40, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> at best it's confusing that array for list of tables to be tested
> against reference tables is allocated within test_acpi_dsdt_table()
> and at worst it would just overwrite list of tables if they were
> added before test_acpi_dsdt_table().
> Move array initialization to test_acpi_one() before we start
> processing tables.
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> ---
> tests/bios-tables-test.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> index 63da978..b72fa80 100644
> --- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> +++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> @@ -229,12 +229,11 @@ static void test_acpi_dsdt_table(test_data *data)
> uint32_t addr = data->fadt_table.dsdt;
>
> memset(&dsdt_table, 0, sizeof(dsdt_table));
> - data->tables = g_array_new(false, true, sizeof(AcpiSdtTable));
>
> test_dst_table(&dsdt_table, addr);
> ACPI_ASSERT_CMP(dsdt_table.header.signature, "DSDT");
>
> - /* Place DSDT first */
> + /* Since DSDT isn't in RSDT, add DSDT to ASL test tables list manually */
> g_array_append_val(data->tables, dsdt_table);
> }
>
> @@ -634,6 +633,7 @@ static void test_acpi_one(const char *params, test_data *data)
>
> boot_sector_test();
>
> + data->tables = g_array_new(false, true, sizeof(AcpiSdtTable));
> test_acpi_rsdp_address(data);
> test_acpi_rsdp_table(data);
> test_acpi_rsdt_table(data);
>
Reviewed-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Marcel